The Golden Horse Award for Best Documentary this year went to Our Youth in Taiwan (我們的青春在台灣)
When the film’s director, Fu Yue (傅榆), accepted the award, she said, with tears trickling down her cheeks, that she hoped Taiwan would one day be accepted as a politically independent entity.
The statement made Chinese participants boycott the closing reception, cancel preplanned itineraries or leave Taiwan earlier than planned.
Fu’s Facebook page was flooded with thousands of comments, mostly angry attacks from China.
They included comments such as: “You can give it all up now, don’t even think of being part of the Chinese movie world.”
Fu’s calm answer was: “I might no longer be able to interact with many outstanding Chinese film workers, and that is regrettable, but I am prepared to take full responsibility for any consequences to my career. I have no regrets.”
Such a straightforward attitude is admirable.
Anyone who wants to make a living in the Chinese market under the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) watchful eye should know that they must get used to the unwritten rule that requires them to openly offer their loyalty.
Whether it be Taiwanese K-pop star Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜), who became the target of fierce Chinese attacks after saying that she came from Taiwan on a South Korean TV show while holding a Republic of China flag and then making a video to apologize and say she is Chinese, or Taiwanese actor Leon Dai (戴立忍), who in 2016 was replaced in the Chinese movie No Other Love (沒有別的愛) amid suspicions that he supports Taiwanese independence, or even entertainers who post pictures with the Chinese phrase “Not even one little piece of China must be lost” — Big Brother sees them all.
Fu is different from these Taiwanese entertainers, who must take a clear and unambiguous stand.
According to a report on Radio Free Asia on Tuesday last week, many Chinese dissidents are being persecuted and anyone who offers a controversial point of view is lucky if they get away with having their accounts closed, as they could very well be sent to prison.
Even more alarmingly, Chinese Internet users could be undercover information gatherers, who report posts to their superiors.
For Taiwanese used to enjoying freedom of expression, this is nothing less than a tragedy, and thanks to China-based Taiwanese singer Huang An (黃安) and his ilk, this tragedy is slowly spreading across Taiwan.
The CCP’s encroachment on Taiwan is not restricted to politics, it is also going on in sports, movies and trade. Again and again Taiwanese yield, but the CCP’s ambition will never be satisfied.
It is now clear beyond doubt that cross-strait service trade agreements and the film industry’s move to China have increased Beijing’s bargaining power. When will Taiwanese finally realize how evil the CCP really is?
Brian Yang is a journalism student.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means