The Golden Horse Award for Best Documentary this year went to Our Youth in Taiwan (我們的青春在台灣)
When the film’s director, Fu Yue (傅榆), accepted the award, she said, with tears trickling down her cheeks, that she hoped Taiwan would one day be accepted as a politically independent entity.
The statement made Chinese participants boycott the closing reception, cancel preplanned itineraries or leave Taiwan earlier than planned.
Fu’s Facebook page was flooded with thousands of comments, mostly angry attacks from China.
They included comments such as: “You can give it all up now, don’t even think of being part of the Chinese movie world.”
Fu’s calm answer was: “I might no longer be able to interact with many outstanding Chinese film workers, and that is regrettable, but I am prepared to take full responsibility for any consequences to my career. I have no regrets.”
Such a straightforward attitude is admirable.
Anyone who wants to make a living in the Chinese market under the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) watchful eye should know that they must get used to the unwritten rule that requires them to openly offer their loyalty.
Whether it be Taiwanese K-pop star Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜), who became the target of fierce Chinese attacks after saying that she came from Taiwan on a South Korean TV show while holding a Republic of China flag and then making a video to apologize and say she is Chinese, or Taiwanese actor Leon Dai (戴立忍), who in 2016 was replaced in the Chinese movie No Other Love (沒有別的愛) amid suspicions that he supports Taiwanese independence, or even entertainers who post pictures with the Chinese phrase “Not even one little piece of China must be lost” — Big Brother sees them all.
Fu is different from these Taiwanese entertainers, who must take a clear and unambiguous stand.
According to a report on Radio Free Asia on Tuesday last week, many Chinese dissidents are being persecuted and anyone who offers a controversial point of view is lucky if they get away with having their accounts closed, as they could very well be sent to prison.
Even more alarmingly, Chinese Internet users could be undercover information gatherers, who report posts to their superiors.
For Taiwanese used to enjoying freedom of expression, this is nothing less than a tragedy, and thanks to China-based Taiwanese singer Huang An (黃安) and his ilk, this tragedy is slowly spreading across Taiwan.
The CCP’s encroachment on Taiwan is not restricted to politics, it is also going on in sports, movies and trade. Again and again Taiwanese yield, but the CCP’s ambition will never be satisfied.
It is now clear beyond doubt that cross-strait service trade agreements and the film industry’s move to China have increased Beijing’s bargaining power. When will Taiwanese finally realize how evil the CCP really is?
Brian Yang is a journalism student.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS