The sparkling seas that lap the miles of sand along Diani beach have made this corner of southeastern Kenya one of the country’s main tourist attractions.
Yet few visitors would know that all the water in their taps comes from boreholes sunk into aquifers — underground reservoirs of freshwater that are also used by residents, businesses and agriculture.
Wellwater means life, said Mary Wanjiru, who manages the Rongai Roasting House, a restaurant in the nearby town of Ukunda, about 30km south of Mombasa. “Without it, life will be totally unbearable in this town given that there are no permanent rivers or freshwater springs.”
However, until recently, water users — and experts — had little idea how sustainable that water supply might be, a particular worry as climate change brings worsening droughts.
The problem is a widespread one across Africa, where little is understood about groundwater supplies, University of Nairobi geology professor Daniel Olago said.
Even basic information — how much water they hold, how their supply replenishes and how they respond under different climatic conditions — is sparse.
“We do not know what we have because we have not done adequate studies on groundwater,” he said.
However, over the past two years that has started to change.
Scientists from the University of Nairobi, the University of Barcelona, Oxford University and the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology have been studying the groundwater system in Kwale County, with the Msambweni aquifer that supplies Ukunda as their main focus.
That has allowed them to determine the aquifer’s size and depth, as well as the geochemistry of its water. A computer program then flags risks linked to water quality, quantity and demand, as well as the area’s economic and social conditions.
They can then model projections for different scenarios based on aspects such as climate or how much water is extracted.
“Lack of adequate information is a common problem throughout the country,” said Olago, one of the lead researchers in the study known as Unlocking the Potential of Groundwater for the Poor.
“We need to know how much of the rainwater is being recharged through rainfall and infiltrations, how much of it is stored and so how much of it can be sustainably used,” he said.
The findings mean that the researchers also know whether aquifer water is suitable for drinking — as the study showed Msambweni’s is — or whether it should be used for industry or irrigation.
Two of the largest users of water in Kwale are mining company Base Titanium and Kwale International Sugar Co, which has 8,000 hectares of sugarcane under irrigation.
Both have dams — and are building more — and both draw from the Msambweni aquifer during times of low rainfall; however, the study shows that their use has not had a large effect on groundwater levels.
The scientists worked closely with the two companies, not least as they have extensive knowledge of Kwale’s groundwater, said Calvince Wara, research operations manager for Rural Focus, a local water consultancy that is involved in the study.
Once the system is well understood, it would be possible to identify the best way to use the water sustainably, Wara said.
The government simply issues borehole licenses to companies that want them, but it typically does not know an aquifer’s size, its replenishment rate or its response to the climate — all key indicators of how long the water might last, he said.
The tool would provide those answers and allow the government to better understand the impact of issuing a new license.
“Through this tool, the regulator can easily tell when water levels in the aquifers are going down and that way it will be easier to control the amount of water that can be extracted for industrial use at any given time,” he said.
Kenyan Water Resources Authority surface water officer Ahmed Mbarak said that the new information would prove useful to his office’s ability to monitor groundwater levels and decide about licenses.
“With the changing climatic conditions, such information will be a golden resource, as it will supplement some of the data we already have,” he told reporters by telephone.
It could “help us fine-tune our rules that govern the issuance of licenses for groundwater extraction,” he said.
The tool developed would prove useful elsewhere in the country, too — not least in the capital, Nairobi, which is struggling to meet water demand, Olago said.
Nairobi’s main water source is the Ndakaini dam, which lies about 50km north of the capital. It supplies about 85 percent of the 500 million liters of water that the city uses each day. However, demand is about 700 million liters.
The level of the dam’s reservoir has dropped considerably and, despite heavy rains, the government said that water rationing in the capital would continue until 2026.
As a result, households and companies are sinking boreholes.
In the 1980s, boreholes in Nairobi were drilled to a depth of 80m, but today, they need to go down 400m, said Mike Lane, a hydrologist with Rural Focus.
“We are chasing the water down and that is not sustainable,” he said.
That is happening elsewhere too, Lane said. The water table has retreated in the flower-growing area of Naivasha, which lies 100km northwest of the capital, as well as in Nanyuki, about 160km north of Nairobi.
Meantime the study also revealed a key risk to the Msambweni aquifer, Wara said.
If too much water is extracted, saltwater from the same sparkling seas that draw the tourists to Diani Beach could leak in, destroying the aquifer.
“It is therefore absolutely paramount that these water resources need to be protected,” he said.
The small Baltic nation of Lithuania last week announced that it would accept a Taiwanese representative office in its capital, Vilnius, and that it would establish its own trade office in Taiwan by the end of the year. This was more than a welcome announcement to Taiwan and goes far beyond the normal establishment of trade relations. Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs Gabrielius Landsbergis summed it up succinctly, boldly saying: “Freedom-loving people should look out for each other.” With these words, Landsbergis was purposefully going beyond normal diplomacy; he was also presenting a moral challenge and reminder to other democratic nations. A look
On a peaceful day in the open Pacific Ocean to the east of Taiwan, a US carrier and five accompanying warships were slowly sailing to guard the western Pacific. Another carrier battle group had just returned to its home port in San Diego. Suddenly, alarms went off as many intercontinental ballistic missiles were launched from the interior of China, flying toward Taiwan. Numerous Chinese warships, carriers, fighter jets, bombers and submarines were fast converging on the US ships. Not too long after, missiles, bombs and torpedoes were fired at the US carrier. The surprise to Americans was the number of
I was a bit startled last week when Legislative Yuan Speaker You Si-kun (游錫堃) suggested that the United States could extend official recognition to an independent Taiwan if China were to launch an invasion. While I think Speaker You is correct, I am not sure it is a helpful point of view. Naturally, there are contingency plans in Washington on diplomatic actions that could deter Chinese military action, but they contemplate the continuity of a democratic Taiwanese government that could survive offshore in exile if part or all of Taiwan is occupied by communist Chinese forces. China’s threat that “Taiwan
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) unscheduled visit to Tibet on July 20 attracted extensive international attention. Although Chinese media said that Xi’s visit was meant to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the accession of Tibet to China, Tibet has remained a politically charged issue for China as well as the international community. The genesis of the turbulent ties between Tibet and China dates back to 1951, when the Chinese regime annexed Tibet through a seven-point agreement. China has used this agreement as proof of its sovereignty over Tibet. Tibetans argue that they were forced to sign the agreement, leading them