Green park space reflects a city’s cultural standards. Newspaper reports have said that only 10 percent of New Taipei City’s green park space has been developed. Of 48 park locations selected by the city, only 15 have been developed, and some are only halfway done.
In the municipality’s Yonghe District (永和), with 200,000 registered residents, parks only cover 1 percent of the land.
The city government has said that development of existing sites has not stopped and that it is installing playgrounds and outdoor workout facilities, greening riverbanks and constructing softball, baseball, basketball and soccer fields, as well as roller-skating rinks.
If these facilities reduce green space or are placed in the riverside parks, they are meaningless. Green spaces are a city’s lungs, so the government should find ways to expropriate land and build parks in densely populated areas, planting flowers and trees. That is more important than building sports fields.
Taipei does no better. At least 17 parks were planned during the Japanese era, but some have shrunk. For instance, Park No. 10 was 1.5 times larger than the current site, the Taipei Botanical Garden, but parts are now used by Taipei Mandarin Experimental Elementary School and the Council of Agriculture.
Several designated parks have been reappropriated for other purposes: Park No. 3 now holds the Lin An Tai Historical House (林安泰古厝); Park No. 5 became the Taipei Arena, Park No. 6 became Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall, and Park No. 9 now houses the Taipei Water Department.
Park No. 16 in Songshan District (松山) and Park No. 17 to the west of the Martyrs’ Shrine remain undeveloped.
As Taiwan’s population rose sharply after World War II, green park space became scarcer. Green space accounts for less than 10 percent of the land in the greater Taipei region, far behind 47 percent in London, 30 percent in New York, 42 percent in Beijing and 36 percent in Shanghai.
The 1940 edition of Taiwan Affairs (台灣現況) said: “The purpose of city parks is to bring comfort and rest to urban life. In the subtropics, where temperatures are high throughout the year, we are easily physically and spiritually fatigued. Thus, parks must cover a wide area with plants, trees, pavilions and ponds.”
The book also mentioned that Taiwan’s first park was Taipei Yuanshan Park, but this is no longer a decent park. The second park was Keelung’s Takasago Park (高砂公園), a five-minute walk from Keelung Railway Station. That park is now gone — very uncivilized, one might say.
Views that attribute the Taipei area’s lack of parks to the dense population do not hold: There are more people in Beijing and Shanghai. The most densely populated metropolis is probably Tokyo, but bustling districts such as Chiyoda and Shinjuku have several parks covering 50 hectares of land, twice the size of Taipei’s Daan Forest Park.
Many countries boast at least one large urban park, but Taiwan has a long way to go, with Daan Forest Park a rare exception. The site used to be a military camp and a veterans’ village, and it was not until 1992 that the city government built the park, despite protests by residents. The park is only one-twelfth the size of New York City’s Central Park.
The development of New York City’s Central Park began when the government acquired land at US writer Washington Irving’s suggestion. Ambrose Kingsland, who strongly supported the development of a large park, won the 1850 mayoral election.
In Taipei’s ongoing mayoral election campaign, one candidate is proposing a “central park plan,” which shows increased cultural awareness.
It is time that government officials changed their mindset.
Lu Ching-fu is a university professor.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming.
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS