Green park space reflects a city’s cultural standards. Newspaper reports have said that only 10 percent of New Taipei City’s green park space has been developed. Of 48 park locations selected by the city, only 15 have been developed, and some are only halfway done.
In the municipality’s Yonghe District (永和), with 200,000 registered residents, parks only cover 1 percent of the land.
The city government has said that development of existing sites has not stopped and that it is installing playgrounds and outdoor workout facilities, greening riverbanks and constructing softball, baseball, basketball and soccer fields, as well as roller-skating rinks.
If these facilities reduce green space or are placed in the riverside parks, they are meaningless. Green spaces are a city’s lungs, so the government should find ways to expropriate land and build parks in densely populated areas, planting flowers and trees. That is more important than building sports fields.
Taipei does no better. At least 17 parks were planned during the Japanese era, but some have shrunk. For instance, Park No. 10 was 1.5 times larger than the current site, the Taipei Botanical Garden, but parts are now used by Taipei Mandarin Experimental Elementary School and the Council of Agriculture.
Several designated parks have been reappropriated for other purposes: Park No. 3 now holds the Lin An Tai Historical House (林安泰古厝); Park No. 5 became the Taipei Arena, Park No. 6 became Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall, and Park No. 9 now houses the Taipei Water Department.
Park No. 16 in Songshan District (松山) and Park No. 17 to the west of the Martyrs’ Shrine remain undeveloped.
As Taiwan’s population rose sharply after World War II, green park space became scarcer. Green space accounts for less than 10 percent of the land in the greater Taipei region, far behind 47 percent in London, 30 percent in New York, 42 percent in Beijing and 36 percent in Shanghai.
The 1940 edition of Taiwan Affairs (台灣現況) said: “The purpose of city parks is to bring comfort and rest to urban life. In the subtropics, where temperatures are high throughout the year, we are easily physically and spiritually fatigued. Thus, parks must cover a wide area with plants, trees, pavilions and ponds.”
The book also mentioned that Taiwan’s first park was Taipei Yuanshan Park, but this is no longer a decent park. The second park was Keelung’s Takasago Park (高砂公園), a five-minute walk from Keelung Railway Station. That park is now gone — very uncivilized, one might say.
Views that attribute the Taipei area’s lack of parks to the dense population do not hold: There are more people in Beijing and Shanghai. The most densely populated metropolis is probably Tokyo, but bustling districts such as Chiyoda and Shinjuku have several parks covering 50 hectares of land, twice the size of Taipei’s Daan Forest Park.
Many countries boast at least one large urban park, but Taiwan has a long way to go, with Daan Forest Park a rare exception. The site used to be a military camp and a veterans’ village, and it was not until 1992 that the city government built the park, despite protests by residents. The park is only one-twelfth the size of New York City’s Central Park.
The development of New York City’s Central Park began when the government acquired land at US writer Washington Irving’s suggestion. Ambrose Kingsland, who strongly supported the development of a large park, won the 1850 mayoral election.
In Taipei’s ongoing mayoral election campaign, one candidate is proposing a “central park plan,” which shows increased cultural awareness.
It is time that government officials changed their mindset.
Lu Ching-fu is a university professor.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS