Taiwan-based sports accessories and luxury bags manufacturer WW Holding Inc on Wednesday said it plans to expand into Southeast Asia and reduce its reliance on the Chinese market.
WW shares on Wednesday rose 2.64 percent to close at NT$74 in Taipei trading following the announcement.
The move, due largely to soaring labor costs in China, is part of a growing trend among international companies. Major US-based disk-drive manufacturer Seagate in January closed its Suzhou factory, resulting in 2,000 lost jobs. In 2015, Japanese electronics manufacturer Panasonic, which had been operating in China for 37 years, stopped building televisions in the country, and in November last year Sony sold all of its shares in a Guangzhou-based factory.
“China doesn’t need foreign companies so badly now in terms of acquiring advanced technology and capital as in previous years,” CNBC quoted Chinese University of Hong Kong professor Chong Tai-Leung (莊太量) as saying on Feb. 2.
The Cabinet’s New Southbound Policy is in line with global trends.
Inconsistent interpretation of laws, the introduction of new regulations — such as China’s cybersecurity law introduced on June 1, which requires network operators to store data on Chinese servers — and fierce competition from domestic companies mean that China is becoming a hostile environment for international investors, CNBC said.
Chinese companies are leaving the local market too. The South China Morning Post in December last year reported that China’s overseas investment for the year was up 50 percent from 2015, whereas Chinese investment in the domestic market grew only 3.1 percent.
Strict laws and rising operating costs are not the only obstacles driving Chinese investors out.
Poor demand and low household incomes are among the major factors driving Chinese businesses out, the paper quoted University of Hong Kong professor Xu Chenggang (許成綱) as saying.
Even when demand exists, strict regulations and policies favorable to Chinese companies are limiting foreign access to the Chinese market. Last year the Chinese government shut down two of Apple’s key services: iBooks and iTunes Movies, which along with Apple Pay and Apple Music are important revenue generators for Apple and central to its mobile functionality and Apple TV platform.
Technology companies are also forced to transfer proprietary technologies to enter joint ventures and in some cases face piracy and patent violations.
“The Chinese government, of course, has aided this process by systematically discriminating against foreign companies, enforcing laws and regulations with regard to multinationals while looking the other way when a domestic company commits a violation,” the New York Post wrote in May last year.
The Chinese government is aware of the need to transition from manufacturing and has implemented a number of strategies. One approach has been to offer incentives to companies who move operations inland, where wages are as much as 30 percent lower than in coastal cities. Beijing is encouraging Chinese companies to invest in automation and to develop high-value products. It also offers rent and power subsidies to textile companies who move to western China’s Xinjiang Province — a cotton-growing region.
However, many question China’s ability to successfully transition from labor-intensive manufacturing, saying that it still lags behind in innovation and cannot move up the value chain as fast as Japan did when it threatened US dominance in the 1980s.
For foreign and Chinese companies alike, China is becoming an unattractive place to sell or manufacture products. Taiwan’s best option is the New Southbound Policy, as well as strengthened ties with the US and Japan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS