The US Congress’ bipartisan US-China Economic and Security Review Commission issued a report on Nov. 15 recommending that all Chinese state-run media employees be required to register as “foreign agents.”
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs called the report “totally discriminatory” and “divorced from reality.” However, the facts speak for themselves.
On Feb. 19 last year, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) toured China’s three main state-run media outlets: the People’s Daily, Xinhua news agency and China Central Television (CCTV). At CCTV, Xi was welcomed by a placard that read: “CCTV belongs to the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] family; we are absolutely loyal and welcome the inspection.”
That same day, Xi chaired a “party working discussion on news and public opinion,” and praised the broadcaster for its “staunch adherence to party principles.” When Chinese property tycoon Ren Zhiqiang (任志強) offered a different opinion on a Chinese microblogging site, the party upbraided him for “transgressing party discipline.” He only escaped because of protection by an old friend, Central Commission for Discipline Inspection Secretary Wang Qishan (王岐山), one of Xi’s key allies.
China News Service (CNS) was established in 1952 by the CCP Central Committee International Department, which is responsible for international intelligence gathering. Former CNS editor-in-chief Liu Beixian (劉北憲) was investigated for “serious discipline breaches” and stripped of his party membership, according to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI), whose Web site says it is a unit of the United Front Work Department (UFWD) of the Central Committee. Apparently, the UFWD is in charge of the CCDI, suggesting that its responsibilities overlap with those of the Ministry of State Security.
Even during the height of media transparency in China, when Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦) was CCP general secretary, he conceded that the media operated as a party mouthpiece, obliged to present the news in overwhelmingly positive terms. For this, he was pushed out of his position. Several media figures have tried to free themselves of the party shackles, but they have not succeeded. This led to the consolidation of state-run and private media outlets in Guangdong, with some media figures even being incarcerated, until the media finally began to toe the line. Foreign investors are still not permitted to buy a stake in Chinese media.
The Chinese communists have been controlling the media ever since the Yanan period of the Chinese Civil War. This was when Hu Qiaomu (胡喬木), Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) main secretary and acting head of the propaganda department, devised the principle of the primacy of the “party spirit,” saying that every single article and every piece of news needs to be in line with the party perspective.
After the communists established the People’s Republic of China, the news reports and articles written by journalists the party had dispatched throughout the nation quite openly set about indoctrinating the public, while “Internal Reference” reports were circulated to senior party leaders.
Last week I published an article about how the CCP had started openly establishing its party apparatus in the US. This news was subsequently removed from the Chinese Web site on which it was first reported. It seems it had transgressed the working principle of the Chinese communists: Conceal your capabilities, bide your time, amass your strengths and wait for the opportune moment.
The US and all Western countries need to be aware of this. Taiwan perhaps more so.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones and Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS