National Development Council (NDC) Minister Chen Mei-ling (陳美伶) on Thursday said that she has made deregulation one of her priorities to nurture start-ups and stimulate investment.
At a news conference after taking office, Chen said that the council would consider drawing up an exit mechanism for poorly implemented public construction projects to avoid wasting tax dollars while allowing the government to better utilize its limited funds. Chen is showing her determination to tackle problems and make tough decisions.
It is a good start for the newly appointed minister, but she will need to take action, or her pledges will be just empty talk. After all, the naming of Chen — who has a doctorate in law and served as a Cabinet secretary-general under former premier Lin Chuan (林全) — to lead a government agency charged with comprehensive planning, administrative coordination, resource distribution and managerial control, raised a few eyebrows during the latest Cabinet reshuffle, as she is not an expert in economics or finance.
Chen has been a civil servant for more than three decades and is thought to easily adjust to any bureaucratic organization. However, her appointment still begs the question of whether it was more about the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s short-term strategy or whether it reflects the government’s new ambition for the economic bureaucracy.
People are aware that the Cabinet-level council has been the victim of a multiyear degradation that has seen it lose power in planning the nation’s economic development due to changes in the external environment and personnel, as well as tensions among government agencies. Some senior citizens remember the council’s past glory, dating back to 1948, and the authority it wielded as it played an important role in drafting economic policies and advising the Cabinet on economic issues. Today, the council has clearly degenerated into a mere bureaucratic organ reduced to researching and evaluating policies.
On Thursday, Chen said the council aims to reposition itself as an agency that is visionary, good at policy implementation and able to respond to the public’s needs.
She said the council would improve the coordination and integration of economic policies among ministries, adding that it aims to reverse the government’s image of being ineffective.
That is good news, but the bigger question remains: Should the council continue in its capacity as a planner on a grand economic and social scale?
There is little doubt that a trusted subordinate like Chen is crucial to Premier William Lai (賴清德). Chen — who served as the Tainan City Government secretary-general from 2010 to last year under then-mayor Lai — is crucial to implementing the DPP government’s ongoing economic development projects, including the four-year Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program.
Unfortunately, there is considerable doubt about whether the council can be tasked to address the convergence of an aging population, a digital economy and technological innovation, which is transforming the future of work and the life of Taiwanese.
In recent years, the council has outsourced many of its economic studies and policy initiatives to other research institutes. Therefore, it is reasonable to wonder how much of a difference Chen will make as the head of the council in today’s political climate, and to wonder if this will be a watershed moment for the council, which traditionally has been led by either premiers, vice premiers or economists, in terms of its status in the government hierarchy.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS