The recent discussions about whether to allow Apple Pay to operate in Taiwan have again drawn attention to mobile payment services. One year after the Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Electronics Payment Processing Institutions Act (電子支付機構管理條例) — which offers a legal framework for third-party payment services — several online shopping portals and credit-card issuing banks have entered the market, while some mobile payment apps have become popular with consumers.
The Cabinet last week approved a proposal for the use of mobile payment services, like Apple Pay, with certain conditions — such as that mobile payment services should not be processed only by international payment networks such as Visa Inc and MasterCard Inc, and that a qualified token service provider (TSP) should be open for both domestic and foreign entities to help process payments.
The clearing and settlement of transactions with credit or debit cards issued domestically also have to be done in Taiwan.
The government is welcoming not only Apple Pay, but also Google Pay, Samsung Pay, Android Pay and similar mobile payment services. At the same time, the government is hoping these mobile payment providers will not just partner with Visa or MasterCard, but work with local non-credit-card firms, such as debit card, EasyCard and other third-party payment service platforms.
A token represents a unique digital identifier that allows payments to be processed without exposing actual account details that could be compromised. The government’s attitude is that mobile payment providers and international payment processing companies should help with the development of local TSPs, system interfaces and verification.
The central bank had earlier said it was concerned about Apple Pay’s service quality and security, as its TSP is operated by entities like Visa or MasterCard outside Taiwan.
Clearly, the government’s conditional approval for mobile payment services is aimed at protecting local players, since some domestic mobile payment companies said that granting approval to foreign platforms would hamper their development. However, in view of the increasing prevalence of online-to-offline transactions and rising mobile shopping, the government’s welcome to Apple Pay is more evidence of the nation’s changing mindset toward the so-called “Bank 3.0” era, following a slew of relaxed policies regarding online banking, third-party payment and other financial-technology-related services in recent years.
Taiwan’s payment ecosystem is unfriendly and lags far behind that of China — led by Alipay — and the US, home to PayPal. That partially helps explain why the nation’s online retail penetration reached 6.2 percent last year, far lower than South Korea’s 14.7 percent, China’s 11.4 percent and the US’ 7.3 percent, according to statistics from the Ministry of Economic Affairs and market researcher Euromonitor International.
Mobile payment services would help increase non-cash payment penetration, and the introduction of Apple Pay is likely to lead the trend to reshape the payment ecosystem in Taiwan and change the payment behavior of consumers.
In the long term, a more market-oriented, user-friendly digital payment policy — either mobile payment or third-party payment — should benefit the development of Taiwan’s Internet environment and e-commerce.
However, whether Apple Pay or other mobile payment services can finally launch in this nation depends on their ability to localize their services with a concrete infrastructure. Issues of data security and storage, as well as tax evasion and the “black” economy, are also key to final regulatory approval. As the nation heads into the Bank 3.0 era, the government’s priority, quite rightly, is to protect consumers while making sure businesses can operate.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which