The publication of the English version of Ong Iok-tek’s (王育德) A History of Agonies is a welcome event since few Western academics are familiar with Taiwan’s history and books on the subject are rarely available in English.
Ong’s book is well-written and helps to fill a gap in this field. The occasion also highligts Ong’s immense contribution to the cause of Taiwanese independence.
Ong founded the Taiwan Youth Society in the spring of 1960. The society’s publication, Taiwan Youth, ran from 1960 to June 2002, 500 issues in all. It served to awaken Taiwanese consciousness among many Taiwanese students abroad, especially those in Japan.
Jerome Keating’s book review is informative on the early days of the Taiwanese independence movement abroad, but his statement that the independence movement originated in Japan in the 1950s and later shifted to the US in the 1970s is incorrect (“The growing pains of Taiwanese consciousness,” Feb. 25, page 11).
On Jan. 1, 1956, a group of Taiwanese in Philadelphia launched a group called Formosans’ Free Formosa (3F). The group was comprised of radiologist Thomas Yang (楊東傑) and three University of Pennsylvania graduate students — John Lin (林榮勳), Edward Chen (陳以德) and Lin Hsi-hu (林錫湖) — as well as Lo Chu-gi (盧主義), who was then attending medical school.
Lo proposed the idea of forming 3F following weeks of discussions about Taiwan. The group’s formation was spontaneous without any outside influence.
Two months later, the Provisional Republic of Taiwan Government headed by Thomas Liao (廖文毅) issued a declaration of independence in Tokyo on Feb. 28, 1956. 3F preceded the Taiwan Youth Society by four years.
On the bottom of the 3F letterhead was this statement: “We are dedicated to the establishment of a free, democratic and independent Republic of Formosa in accordance with the principle of self-determination of peoples. We repudiate, therefore, all forms of totalitarian dictatorships, Chinese Communist or nationalist.”
3F’s main tasks were to distribute periodic newsletters to Taiwanese students in the US, contacts within the US media and policy elites. In the fall of 1957, Lo helped Liao’s provisional government file a petition with the UN, seeking trusteeship to be followed by a plebiscite.
On Jan. 1, 1958, after coping successfully with the FBI’s investigation of 3F’s activities, 3F was reorganized into United Formosans for Independence (UFI) and Lo was elected as its first president.
In addition to disseminating newsletters and occasional monographs, members of UFI started visiting members of the US Congress and contacted then-US deputy secretary of state Chester Bowles. Lo also corresponded with luminaries, such as Adlai Stevenson, a US presidential candidate in 1952 and 1956, senator Wayne Morse of Montana, University of Chicago professor Quincy Wright and George Kerr.
These activities were the precursor of grassroots diplomacy that the Formosan Association of Public Affairs was to undertake in later years.
In 1958, Lo Chu-gi published under his pen name Li Thian-hok (李天福) two essays in prestigious US journals. The first was The China Impasse — A Formosan View, which appeared in the April 1958 issue of Foreign Affairs.
Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) convened an ad hoc Cabinet meeting to discuss how to respond. Then-Repubic of China ambassador to the UN Chiang Ting-fu (蔣廷黻) sent a rebuttal that Foreign Affairs declined to print.
In November 1958, New Republic magazine ran a series of articles debating Taiwan’s future with academics from the US, the UK and Australia. Lo contributed the concluding essay, Formosans Know What They Want (Nov. 24, 1958).
These papers placed the idea of Taiwanese independence as a relevant topic in the global arena.
UFI later grew into the US-wide United Formosans in America for Independence (UFAI) in 1966. In 1970, UFAI merged with Taiwanese independence groups in Canada, Europe, Japan and Taiwan to become World United Formosans for Independence (WUFI).
The seed of this agglomeration was a joint declaration that Lo drafted at the request of the Tokyo chapter in 1961.
An abridged version is as follows:
Our basic convictions: We hold the following convictions to be fundamental to the cause of Formosan independence.
1. What constitutes a nation is not speaking the same language or belonging to the same ethnic group, but having accomplished great things in the past and the wish to accomplish them in the future.
2. The history of Formosa has been nothing but an incessant struggle of a freedom-loving people for liberty against unwanted intruders.
3. We Formosans share a distinct sense of national identity derived from sharing a cultural outlook, a set of values and a common love of our native land. Our manifest sense of identity and our past struggles clearly endow to us a right to self-determination of our future.
4. The only just and legitimate basis of an independent Formosa is the recognition that Formosa belongs rightfully to Formosans.
5. Relieved of outside pressure and given a chance to manage our own destiny, we Formosans are fully capable of building a viable and dynamic democratic nation.
6. Our form of government must be based on the consent of the public, a respect for the rule of law and certain inalienable civil liberties.
7. To strive for a free and independent Formosa is the most effective way by which we Formosans can contribute to the cause of justice, humanity and peace for the world.
Ong signed the declaration on behalf of the Taiwan Youth Society and Li for the UFI.
On Jan. 1, a concert was held in Suang-lien Church in Taipei to commemorate the 60th anniversary of 3F. Ted Lau (劉重義) of the Taiwanese National Congress invited more than 10 civic groups, including WUFI, the Taiwan Presbyterian Church, the Taiwan Association of University Professors and the Lee Teng-hui Foundation to cosponsor the event, while much of the organizing work was carried out by members of the Sunflower movement. Many talented musicians gave the 600-plus audience a most memorable and uplifting experience.
At the reception and forum following the concert, Lo was asked to comment on Taiwan’s current situation and future prospects. Here is the gist of his remarks:
“Taiwan is at a crossroads of history. Taiwan faces the Chinese Communist Party’s economic infiltration, political pressure and military threats. If Taiwan should fall, Taiwanese will forfeit their freedom, dignity, and guarantee of life and property. This will be a severe calamity. Furthermore, due to its geostrategic position, Taiwan’s loss would cause the collapse of the US-Japan and US-South Korea military alliances. A decisive war between the US and China, as the latter continues its aggression to dominate the world would inevitably ensue with the potential to mushroom into World War III, thus endangering the survival of the human race.”
Rick Fisher, a US academic, has warned that if Taiwan were to fall into the hands of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), it would certainly turn the nation into a forward base for the Second Artillery, the PLA’s missile strike force armed with conventional and nuclear warheads. Fisher speculated that such a deployment is not solely due to projecting the PLA’s power into the western Pacific, but also because Taiwanese are expendable, since many are “contaminated” with Western democratic values.
On the positive side, the 2014 Sunflower movement proclaimed to the world the Taiwanese will to safeguard their sovereignty and preserve their democracy.
With a major victory by the Democratic Progressive Party in both the presidential and legislative elections in January, Taiwan can have a bright future if the public, including the awakened youth, can reinforce their national identity and raise national morale to the level of 2004, when 2 million people held hands to stage a demonstration.
Formosans’ Free Formosa is not only indispensable to the welfare of Taiwanese, but is also critical to the peace and stability of East Asia and the world. It is the way to restore honor to the heroes and victims of the 228 Incident. It is the best way to avoid ethnic cleansing, this time by the PLA.
God bless Taiwan.
Li Thian-hok is a freelance commentator based in Pennsylvania.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS