Democracy will prevail
Soon after Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) took over as mayor of Taipei, he was challenged to review numerous build-operate-tranfer projects left by former Taipei mayors Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
The Taipei Dome project has been unanimously reported as a scandal over its effect on the surrounding environment, traffic, transportation connections, commercialization of athletics and concerns of public safety, including emergency exits being blocked by commercial facilities.
The MeHAS City project was questioned after the land value was intentionally underestimated in 2006 to benefit builder Radium Life Tech Co, which built the housing complex near MRT Xiaobitan Station. The Taipei City Government was paid less than 20 percent of the land’s value and lost about NT$10 billion (US$318.5 million).
The Twin Stars project proved to be a scandal for former KMT Taipei city councilor Lai Su-ju (賴素如), who received NT$15 million in bribes to favor a consortium led by Taipei Gateway International Development Co.
The management of the Taipei New Horizon project in Songshan Cultural and Creative Park was accused of turning a tower meant to promote cultural and creative industries into a corporate headquarters.
The Syntrend Creative Park project was in the spotlight over rent and the possibility that it could siphon business from the neighboring Guanghua Digital Plaza.
The Three Year Life Park project was questioned over reports that the Foxconn Group spent only NT$1 billion, but got a 50-year tenancy deal by taking advantage of a land-cost estimate that was well below market value.
Former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) criticized Ko for launching a “Cultural Revolution” targeting Hau and Ma.
Ko has become famous for his straightforward remarks, including one made after he received a watch from British Minister of State for Transport Susan Kramer. He accepted it, but said to reporters: “I can just give it to someone else or take it to a scrap metal dealer and sell it for cash.”
Who is to be blamed? Unfortunately, it would be Kramer, because she did not know watches as gifts can mean “go to hell” or seen as a final farewell in Chinese culture.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who rose to power in 2013, has also taken action to crack down on corruption. Former Chinese Communist Party Chongqing secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), former head of domestic security Zhou Yongkang (周永康) and Ling Jihua (令計劃), once a top aide to former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), were all knocked down one after the other. Almost every high-ranking Chinese official has met with trouble.
Now, Xi holds the executive, legislative, judicial and military power of China in his hands. Is there anyone who can say no to him? Where are the checks in China’s system? Is China ruled by one man or by law? Will Xi be the one who brings China into the democratic age, or the one to build a dictatorship?
Some predict that Xi will follow former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) lead and lift bans on political parties and ease restrictions on the media to democratize China.
It looks like Ko and Xi are heroes. Are they identical twins, or totally different?
On Thursday last week, the Foreign Policy Web site published an interview with Ko in which he said people should talk about “two countries, one system,” while Xi insists on “one country, two systems.”
Therefore, Ko and Xi are very different. Even in the electronic era, communication between the two systems is difficult. However, one thing is certain: the universal value of democracy will prevail.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS