Official figures published two weeks ago showed that China’s GDP expanded by 7.4 percent last year. That was a significant drop from the 7.7 percent seen in 2013, and the weakest rate of growth since 1990, when the country was grappling with international sanctions in the wake of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre.
While the government has spun the downturn as a good thing, as it deliberately shifts from an unsustainable, export-led boom to relying on domestic demand to fuel economic growth, people across the nation are feeling the heat.
Coal and copper prices are down owing to lack of demand; strikes and protests are becoming increasingly common. The prospect of weaker demand from China has also been a key factor behind plunging global oil prices.
Illustration: Mountain people
“From an industry point of view, obviously the hardest hit are the miners and the upstream players — the iron ore industry, steel, refineries, they’re all being really squeezed,” said Andrew Polk, a Beijing-based senior economist with the Conference Board China Center. “China’s consumption has held up relatively well so far, but [the slowdown] looks to be finally feeding through to the consumption side as well.”
While the downturn is, on one level, intentional, policymakers face a tough challenge in engineering a slowdown while maintaining enough control over the financial system to prevent a crash.
Growth is expected to slow further over the next three years, as officials act to control the sliding property market and rein in excessive borrowing by local governments — the IMF has projected a growth rate of 6.8 percent for this year.
“The financial crisis dealt a mortal blow to the export-led growth model, for two reasons,” Lombard Street Research China expert Diana Choyleva said. “One was the slowdown in global demand, and the other was the adjustment of the yuan against the [US] dollar. Not only has the size of the pie reduced, but their ability to carve out ever-larger parts of it has diminished.”
Her analysis of Chinese data suggests growth is actually considerably slower than official figures suggest.
Even China’s middle class, a group that has expanded at breakneck speed and become accustomed to constantly rising living standards over recent years, is starting to feeling the pinch.
On Jan. 15, many shoppers at the Huapu Hypermarket in central Beijing were complaining of tough economic times.
“I’m a businessman, so of course this is affecting me,” said Mr Ji, 36, a tobacco and wine wholesaler.
His income had dropped as much as 30 percent over the past year, he said, as he dropped spring onions into his shopping cart.
“I’m starting to think about changing careers,” he said.
A young woman surnamed Chen said that wages at her public sector company were shrinking.
“We’re also getting less of a bonus this year — though I’m single, so it’s not so bad,” she said.
Polk said: “From an industry point of view, one of the ways [the downturn] is going to play out is that wage growth will have to slow. We’re starting to see a convergence between labor productivity and wage growth. When wage growth rises above productivity, companies start to be unprofitable.”
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) first urged the public to accept the “new normal” of economic growth while on an inspection tour in Henan Province in May last year. Since then, state media has embraced the term as an assurance that authorities are firmly in control, carefully shedding their growth-at-all-costs mantra for a more equitable approach to development.
Under the new normal, officials say, the Chinese economy will be fairer and more sustainable, and the nation can finally begin making progress toward restoring its environment after decades of wanton pollution.
“The market, crazy about speed and figures, seems to have missed the reality that the Chinese economy is healthier under the ‘new normal’ featuring positive trends of stable growth, an optimized structure, enhanced quality and improved social welfare,” Xinhua news agency said on Jan. 14.
At the Davos World Economic Forum on Jan. 15, Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang (李克強) said: “China will avoid a hard landing, continue its ongoing reform and restructuring and ensure a prolonged period of sustainable future medium-to-fast growth.”
However, Renmin University economics professor Chen Xiushan (陳秀山) believes that this “new normal” will mean something very different for, say, an oil worker in Heilongjiang Province than it will to an upwardly mobile tech entrepreneur in Beijing.
The downturn could be devastating for people working in basic commodity industries such as steel and cement, as the property market continues to sink and the government implements new measures to chip away at overcapacity. However, other sectors could benefit, as Beijing pumps subsidies into healthcare, technology, and culture industries such as film and music.
Some regions are likely to adjust better to the new growth model. Coastal southeast China, an economically diverse region, might come through the downturn unscathed, Chen said, while inland and industrial provinces would almost inevitably struggle.
Northeast China “does not stand much chance for economic transition,” as its economy leaned heavily on clunky, anachronistic state-owned enterprises and its population was increasingly migrating south in search of work, he said.
HSBC senior global economist Karen Ward said that for the time being, the authorities were continuing to underpin economic growth with public building projects.
“Consumption is still stable and strong, it’s just not big enough: and while exports are a drag, it’s just not filling the void. That’s why they’re still filling the gap with infrastructure spending,” she said.
Experts are divided about this infrastructural spending spree. Some fear the authorities have squandered money on unnecessary projects, reminiscent of the “bridges to nowhere” that came to characterize the Japanese investment bubble of the 1980s. Investment now accounts for more than half of GDP.
However, Ward, who is optimistic about the outlook for China, insisted that the country was still in desperate need of infrastructure.
“If you look at what they’ve got — sewerage systems for example — they’re still a very poor country. They’re building things that they need. In terms of infrastructure, it looks like Japan in the 1950s, not the 1980s,” she said. “There are sectors that are massively over capacity — steel is definitely one of them. But in the broad scheme of things, are they wasting money to generate growth? That just doesn’t worry me.”
Chinese policymakers certainly claim they can avoid a crash.
As Li said in Davos: “If I could compare the Chinese economy to a running train, what I want you to know is that this train will not lose speed or momentum. It will only be powered by stronger dynamo and run with greater steadiness, bringing along new opportunities and new momentum of growth.”
Choyleva said that the gear change would not be easy.
“The new leadership is intent on reform; but their resolve will be tested big-time,” she said.
London-based economist and China-watcher George Magnus said last week that the authorities’ resolve to let the slowdown run its course might be severely tested as it started to cause more financial pain for some.
“There is almost certainly a lower limit to growth, at or not too far away from 7 percent, where official concerns about unemployment and stability will increase — mainly because of the risk this could pose to social stability against a backdrop of a rising level of strikes and other labor unrest,” Magnus said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS