Last week, Quanta Computer Inc’s decision to trim its workforce at its Taoyuan production facility, along with local media reports that some high-tech companies in the Hsinchu Science Park have also been considering recruitment freezes, indicated that the business climate in Taiwan’s tech sector has turned significantly weaker in the second half of the year, which is the traditional high season for electronics.
This is a worrisome sign for Taiwan because it showed that worsening debt problems in the eurozone and weakening economic growth in the US have not only hit the local tech sector’s outbound shipments, but would also have an impact on the domestic labor market.
Economic data released last week provided more reasons for concern about the nation’s export--oriented economy. The Ministry of Economic Affairs on Tuesday said that export orders increased 5.26 percent year-on-year last month to US$36.71 billion — much slower than the 11.12 percent rise in July and the slowest in nearly 22 months.
The latest export order data showed a general moderation in demand for Taiwan’s overseas shipments over the next one to three months from the nation’s major export markets, excluding the six ASEAN countries.
A closer look at the data revealed that substantially slowing demand for orders for Taiwan’s major tech goods — electronic components, precision machinery, and information and communications products — has alarming implications for GDP growth in the fourth quarter, not to mention the whole year.
Given the increasing downside risks to the global economy, the IMF — in its biannual World Economic Outlook report released on Tuesday — revised downward its GDP growth forecast for Taiwan from 5.4 percent to 5.2 percent for this year, and from 5.2 percent to 5 percent for next year, after it cut growth forecasts for the global economy to 4 percent for this year and next year, from 4.3 and 4.5 percent respectively.
While most government officials still emphasized that the nation’s economic fundamentals were in good shape, no one can deny that Taiwan is certain to be influenced by eurozone and US economic woes.
Pointing to the slowing growth in export orders last month, the continued slowing growth in imports since April and the IMF’s slashing of GDP growth forecasts for Taiwan this year and next year, Council of Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如) on Wednesday warned that Taiwan is facing growing headwinds through the end of next year.
The latest unemployment rate figure released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics on Thursday came as no surprise, as it rose for the third straight month to 4.45 percent last month as college graduates entered the labor market. An obvious concern, however, is the slow hiring in tech manufacturing and trade sectors, which reflected producers’ downbeat outlook and might lead to more postponing of capital spending and recruitment into next year, Standard Chartered Bank economist Tony Phoo (符銘財) has said.
Then, on Friday, the ministry’s industrial production data showed last month’s output rose 3.88 percent year-on-year, which was not only a sharp drop from the double-digit growth seen early this year, but also provided more evidence that external uncertainties are weighing on domestic manufacturers.
Against this backdrop, stock market investors foresee bigger challenges ahead. The benchmark TAIEX has plunged 21.47 percent since the beginning of this year after the recent global market rout pushed the index to a nearly two-year low on Friday. No one knows when the market will bottom out; what we do know is that the government has no other options but to boost domestic consumption and investment, or the public will have to be prepared for hardship.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS