As Japan seems unable to contain the radiation fallout from its crippled nuclear power plant, there have been reports that contaminated water has seeped into the Pacific Ocean, and that water with low contamination levels was released directly into the sea. Since the plant is located in a key fishing and aquaculture area, the contamination of the food chain will have far-reaching effects.
Concern over food safety has led to a 25 percent drop in demand for aquatic products in Japan. Japanese experts say radioactive substances in the sea will be absorbed by seaweed and other organisms at the bottom of the food chain. Seaweed is eaten by small fish, which are eaten by bigger fish, and eventually the whole food chain will be contaminated. We must not ignore the fact that the half-life of cesium-137 is 30 years, and thus will have a long-term effect on the ocean’s ecology.
While many countries have banned all imports of Japanese aquatic products, Taiwan has only prohibited imports of food products — including agricultural and aquatic products — from Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma and Chiba prefectures. For imports from other areas, stricter controls already implemented remain in place. For the time being, safety concerns demand that imports of Japanese aquatic products be suspended until Japanese authorities have verified that the waters and the fish are not contaminated and issued supporting documents. More importantly, the government should quickly set up a mechanism to ensure that contaminated agricultural and aquatic products are prevented from entering Taiwan.
There is much room for improvement in the Taiwanese government’s response to the Japanese nuclear crisis. Using the fishing industry as an example, a number of local institutions had insisted that fish caught by Taiwanese fishing boats were not contaminated, but they were unable to provide detailed information about the possible effects or concrete response measures to set up standards for the fishermen to follow and alleviate concern among local consumers.
Although China said estimates of weather and sea currents showed that nuclear radiation would not affect the ecology in the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea in the short term, it warned fishing vessels heading to the Sea of Japan and parts of the Pacific Ocean close to the disaster area that this still entails a certain risk and advised caution. China also said radiation from contaminated fish and other sea organisms could further contaminate and harm humans, and that the radioactive contamination of dead sea animals would return to the ecological system after decomposition. It would then pose a threat to the ecology and aquatic species after traveling through the food chain. China would therefore, at an appropriate time, monitor the affected waters and conduct a prompt evaluation of the effect of radioactive substances on the fishing industry and the surrounding environment. If the situation deteriorates, it would consider stopping imports of Japanese aquatic products and stop fishing in waters close to Japan.
A few days ago, millions of fish died in King Harbor in Los Angeles, California. The incident set off environmental concerns among local residents. Every year in China, a tide of toxic seaweed along the country’s coastal areas causes hundreds of million of yuan in economic losses and several deaths from poisoning. In the future, the number of such incidents is likely to increase, and Taiwan will not be spared. In addition to strengthening its research efforts, Taiwan should build a complete monitoring and prevention mechanism to prevent a widespread panic when the situation arises.
Du Yu is a member of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then