In order to generate the right atmosphere for the Republic of China’s (ROC) centennial, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in conjunction with different media outlets, has produced a number of television programs to highlight the historical ties between the founding fathers of the ROC, such as Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) and Taiwan. However, these programs are little more than a crude attempt to cover up the fact that a foreign regime rules the nation and they seriously distort Sun’s original intention in supporting the independence of small and weak Asian nations.
By the late 19th century, Taiwan and Vietnam were imperial colonies, and the Qing Dynasty (later the ROC) had basically been demoted to “semi-colonial status” by invading foreign powers. Bullied by the same imperialist powers, Taiwanese, Vietnamese and Chinese patriots were sometimes in contact and even joined each another’s organizations in order to exchange opinions on how to save their nations.
In 1904, the Vietnamese revolutionary leader Phan Boi Chau established a secret society named the Reformation Society, which advocated overturning French colonialism by violent means in order to build a new Vietnam based on a constitutional monarchy. At the time, Japan had gained the upper hand in its war with Russia and the international situation made Phan believe that Japan, which had emerged stronger after the Meiji Restoration, could serve as a model for Vietnam. In 1905, he visited Japan for the first time to learn the secret of this great success.
It was during this visit that Phan met Liang Qichao (梁啟超), a Chinese intellectual who lived in Japan, and Sun, who was visiting. Sun criticized Phan’s belief in constitutional monarchy as being too conservative, saying that a democratic republic would be better.
Sun suggested that small and weak Asian nations should cooperate to help each other achieve independence. He also suggested that Phan encourage the Vietnamese to join the Chinese revolution, pledging to help Vietnam transform into an independent state once the Chinese revolution had succeeded.
Phan, however, suggested that Sun assist Vietnam to achieve its independence first, so that Chinese revolutionaries could then use Vietnam as a base in their fight against the Qing Dynasty.
In order to link small and weak Asian colonies, Sun made trips to Taiwan and Vietnam. The founding father of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh, also visited China on several occasions seeking help. The ROC government even considered Ho a spy for the Chinese Communist Party and imprisoned him for about a year in Guangxi Province. However, he was not the only Vietnamese to play an active role in the Chinese revolution, with the long-term goal of later leveraging China’s strength to secure Vietnamese independence.
Some media outlets have intentionally exaggerated the participation of Taiwanese, such as Weng Chun-ming (翁俊明) and Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水), in the Taiwanese chapter of the Tongmenghui, the precursor of the KMT, in an attempt to create the impression that a meaninfgul number of Taiwanese at that time leaned toward China.
However, the true significance of Taiwanese participation in the Chinese revolution should be seen in terms of how the long-term goal of such individuals was Taiwanese independence, not unification with China.
Chiung Wi-vun is chairman of the Taiwan-Vietnam Cultural Association and an associate professor in the Department of Taiwanese Literature at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then