The question that dashed Angel Feng’s job prospects always came last.
Fluent in Chinese, English, French and Japanese, Feng, a 26-year-old business school graduate, interviewed with a half-dozen companies in Beijing this year, hoping for her first job in the private sector, where the salaries are highest.
“The boss would ask several questions about my qualifications, then he’d say: ‘I see you just got married. When will you have a baby?’” Feng recalled. “I’d say not for five years, at least, but they didn’t believe me.”
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
Turned down again and again, she took a job at “a really bad place,” then quit. Finally she ended up at a “semi-state” organization run by the Ministry of Education. The pay is lower, but she gets benefits that hark back to the socialist days, including at least 90 days of maternity leave at full pay.
The difference says everything about the mixed challenges facing women in China’s hybrid economy three decades after it embarked on dazzling economic reforms. Women today no doubt have more freedom to choose their paths, but the expanding private sector is not always welcoming.
As socialist-era structures shrink, the powerful cultural traditions that value men over women — long held in abeyance by official Chinese Communist Party support for women’s rights — have returned in force.
Many employers are choosing not to hire women in an economy where there is an oversupply of labor and where women are perceived as bringing additional expense in the form of maternity leave and childbirth costs. The law stipulates that employers must help cover those costs, and feminists are seeking a system of state-supported childbirth insurance to lessen discrimination.
The result is that even highly qualified candidates like Feng can struggle to find a footing. After her series of rejections, Feng finally found work at a company that promoted Chinese brands. It was hardly her first choice.
The hours were long, and a colleague who suffered a late miscarriage was ordered back to work within three days. Her salary was about US$745 a month, without benefits.
She quit in July for a job with the China Education Association for International Exchange. The pay is lower, about US$625 a month, but she gets a housing allowance and at least her employer does not object to employees having babies.
The job may be “a bit boring,” she said, but for now, she, like others, has made her choice.
Guo Jianmei (郭建梅), director of the Beijing Zhongze Women’s Legal Counseling and Service Center, insists that, overall, women today are in a better position than they were three decades ago.
“They know so much more about their rights,” she said. “They are better educated. For those with a competitive spirit, there’s a world of opportunity here now, whether they are businesswomen, scientists, farmers or even political leaders. There really have been huge changes.”
Practical concerns about coping in a highly competitive world are also feeding into a powerful identity crisis among China’s women.
“The main issue we face is confusion, about who we are and what we should be,” said Qin Liwen, a magazine columnist. “Should I be a ‘strong woman’ and make money and have a career, maybe grow rich, but risk not finding a husband or having a child?”
“Or should I marry and be a stay-at-home housewife, support my husband and educate my child? Or, should I be a ‘fox’ — the kind of woman who marries a rich man, drives around in a BMW, but has to put up with his concubines?” she said.
Feng Yuan (馮媛), director of the Center for Women’s Studies at Shantou University, said many women were deciding to opt out of the private sector.
“The state sector is quite popular with women because their rights are better protected there,” she said.
At least on paper, women’s rights are supposed to be well protected. In 2005, the government amended the landmark 1992 Law on the Protection of Women’s Rights and Interests, known as the Women’s Constitution, to make gender equality an explicit state policy. It also outlawed, for the first time, sexual harassment.
Yet sex discrimination is widespread. Only a few women dare to sue employers for unfair hiring practices, dismissal on grounds of pregnancy or maternity leave, or sexual harassment, experts say. Employers commonly specify sex, age and physical appearance in job offers.
There are gaps in the law. A major problem, said Feng Yuan, who is not related to Angel Feng, is that it does not define sex discrimination.
The law also sticks to the longstanding requirement that women retire five years earlier than men at the same jobs, thereby reducing earnings and pensions.
In 2008, 67.5 percent of Chinese women over 15 were employed, said Yang Juhua of the Center for Population and Development Studies at Renmin University, citing World Bank statistics.
That was a drop from the most recent Chinese government data, from 2000, showing that 71.52 percent of women from 16 to 54 were employed, compared with 82.47 percent of men from 16 to 59. Yang has calculated that women earn 63.5 percent of men’s salaries, a drop from 64.8 in 2000.
And yet there are many stories of individual success, built on hard work — and some luck. Shi Zaihong’s is one.
Born into a poor rural family in Anhui Province, Shi, now 41, came to Beijing to work as a nanny in 1987. She earned about US$6 a month.
Today, she works 10 cleaning and child-minding jobs, earning about US$1,050 a month. With her husband, who runs a small business putting up advertisements, she bought an apartment just outside Beijing for about US$75,000 — an astonishing achievement for a migrant worker with just five years of education.
The mother of a 16-year-old son and a three-year-old daughter, Shi can now apply for her children to legally join her because buying property confers this right, she said.
Shi’s eyes shine as she talks about her accumulation of wealth, far outstripping what her mother was able to save as a farmer.
“I have taken advantage of every opportunity that I had, and I have always worked hard,” she said. “Things are good. Very good.”
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS