People in Taiwan have long seemed to be tangled in a web of issues pertaining to historical origins, differentiating one another with labels such as wai-shengren (外省人) — Mainlanders who fled from China with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) after 1949 — or the benshengren (本省人), those who came to Taiwan from China centuries ago. Recent reports on the outpouring of love and care for Chin Heng-wei (金恆煒), however, have debunked claims that a “provincial complex” (省籍情結) divides the people in this country.
A fundraiser was held last week for Chin, a political commentator known for his outspoken pro--Taiwan independence stance. The fundraiser was initiated as a means to help Chin, who is embroiled in financial difficulties because of multiple lawsuits against him. The financial burden is expected to take a bigger toll on him following his diagnosis with pancreatic cancer in August.
Little did the fundraiser organizers know that they were in for a jaw-dropping success. Within one week, more than NT$23 million (US$744,000) was raised, well beyond the initial objective of NT$5 million.
The remarkable sum that was gathered within such a short period surely comes as heartwarming news and a testimony to Taiwanese benevolence.
That the majority of the sum came in the form of small donations by members of the public further demonstrated that many people, at least among pan-green supporters, have moved beyond the “provincial complex,” dashing the purported ethnic barriers.
Chin fits well in the category of so-called wai-shengren, having been born in Zhejiang Province and speaking hardly a word of Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese).
That, however, has not stopped the pan-greens, characterized by their pro-independence stance, from embracing Chin and extending a helping hand.
It’s no secret that whenever elections roll around, some politicians are quick to play the “provincial” or “ethnic” card, using it as a campaign tool to manipulate tensions in their favor.
The successful fundraising efforts for Chin has demonstrated that the labels waishengren and benshengren no longer play a significant role among the pan-green electorate. As suggested by Chin’s case, it doesn’t matter if one is a waishengren or ben-shengren; so long as people manifest love for Taiwan through deeds, they are embraced by the pan-greens as Taiwanese.
It subsequently came to many a mind that in October 2007, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), then the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate, also proclaimed his devotion to Taiwan.
Citing a speech by French President Nicolas Sarkozy in a talk about Taiwanese identity, Ma, alluding to Sarkozy’s remark that “What makes us French is not only that we were born in France but also that we choose to stay in France,” also touted his love for Taiwan.
Two years into his presidency, however, Ma still questions why the opposition often doubts his stance and attachment to Taiwan.
Ma is well advised to look at Chin and learn a thing or two, for the president’s profession of love for this country counts for very little when such rhetoric comes only when election time rolls around.
The Chin story is a soothing and encouraging example that ethnic identification is melting away among the public. One can only hope that politicians could arrive at such a conclusion as well.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS