Over the recent Lunar New Year holidays, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) made a special trip to Xiamen in Fujian Province to visit the Zhangpu Development Park for Taiwanese Farmers. This park poses a great threat to Taiwan’s agricultural sector.
Trying to get Taiwanese farmers on its side has been an important part in China’s united-front strategy against Taiwan. Zhangzhou, a city just north of the development park, has worked assiduously to encourage Taiwanese, especially farmers from central and southern Taiwan, to bring their capital, crop and animal varieties, as well as technological and managerial skills, and set up businesses there. The establishment of a development park for farmers to attract Taiwanese businesspeople, farmers and technological know-how is a very clever strategy that has succeeded because of “matchmaking” by retired government officials and disgruntled political hacks from Taiwan.
The Zhangpu development park is located just across the Strait from Taiwan. Many Taiwanese have their family origins here and the local dialect is very similar to the Hoklo, commonly known as Taiwanese. These features made the area the first testing ground for China’s promotion of an experimental cross-strait agricultural cooperative zone.
In April 2006, the development park was established in Zhangzhou City’s Zhangpu County. It included a technological service center, a business development center and six special industrial development zones for flora, fruits and vegetables, tealeaves, fishery and the processing of agricultural and related products, as well as livestock products.
Sixty-eight Taiwanese-owned agricultural companies operate within the park, as well as three individual industrial and commercial households established by Taiwanese farmers. They have invested a total of US$110 million and have an annual production value of 1.5 billion yuan (US$219.8 million).
The park is also introducing almost 200 varieties of high quality Taiwanese species and crops, such as shrimp, red drum, abalone, grouper, beans, tea leaves, high-quality fruit, butterfly orchids and regular orchids.
It covers more than 141,600 hectares, which accounts for two-thirds of the total agricultural land in the entire Zhangpu County. The park is also encouraging the development of more than 30 types of advanced technology like the cross-breeding of Chinese and Taiwanese varieties of shrimp and special packages for fruit and organic goods. The cultivation of butterfly orchids has proven to be a major industry within the park.
The park has an annual production value of flora worth NT$500 million (US$15.6 million) and the flora has been exported to more than 20 western countries.
Taiwanese-owned agricultural businesses have already made US$421 million in foreign exchange from the Zhangzhou region, with an annual export quantity of more than 44,000 tonnes of vegetables, more than 200 tonnes of short necked clam meat, more than 1,150 tonnes of crab meat, more than 3,000 tonnes of products made from ginger and exports of flora that have made as much as US$7 million in foreign exchange.
It is obvious that people setting up businesses in the development park are not only taking Taiwan’s precious resources over there, they are also introducing advanced cultivation techniques and management skills, as well as passing on abundant experience in sales and marketing.
In just a few short years, one single development park for Taiwanese farmers has spurred rapid development of the agricultural industry in China and has increased the foreign exchange earning-power of China’s agricultural products.
This will without a doubt threaten the opportunities for Taiwan to export similar products produced here.
There is reason behind the worries of our farmers and the Taiwanese government should recognize the severity of this problem and adjust the pace of cross-strait agricultural exchange.
Du Yu is a member of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS