Itwas a hated symbol of the division of Europe and the world for more than 28 years. Then suddenly the Berlin Wall was gone.
Of course, the Wall did not physically disappear overnight, but the events of Nov. 9, 1989, effectively removed the Wall as a barrier between East and West.
That night was the busiest of my journalism career, as I shuttled from one city border crossing point to another, observing the build up of jubilant East Berliners at the inner city frontier — until, around midnight, panicky Communist border officials, unable to contain the swelling crowds any longer, let them pass through to West Berlin.
The crowds poured joyously in to the Western half of the city, from all the major checkpoints — Bornholmerstrasse in the north, Invalidenstrasse in the middle and, of course, at the internationally famous Checkpoint Charlie.
Many were setting foot on West Berlin territory for the first time in their lives. Some families even drove across in their Trabis — the legendary East German “stinker” cars — to the cheers of West Berliners who had congregated to welcome them.
At times the Wall almost disappeared beneath the waves of humanity.
The first person to cross at Checkpoint Charlie was Angelika Wache, a then 34-year-old East Berliner. Wiping joyous tears from her cheeks she exclaimed: “I just can’t believe it. I don’t feel like I’m in a prison anymore.”
For most of that wildly happy, unforgettable night, I stood at the Invalidenstrasse border crossing point interviewing East Berliners, thrilled by the sudden, unexpected breach in the Wall. They exchanged hugs and kisses and ran the gauntlet of cheering West Berliners.
I watched in disbelief as British and US military policemen were photographed shaking the hands of East German border guards, even conferring with them on how best they should control the sudden flood of East Berlin arrivals. Hours earlier they had been virtual enemies, treating one another with disdain.
At midnight, I forced my way through the throng at Invalidenstrasse to find a beaming Walter Momper, then Berlin’s mayor, with his familiar red scarf around his neck, standing near the control sheds, surrounded by celebrating East Berliners slapping him on the back and plying him with champagne.
We conducted a radio interview, albeit against a cacophony of joyful background noise. I had never seen Momper looking so happy.
He said: “This is the moment we have all been waiting for. For Berliners, this is the happiest day of their lives, the city is one again. It’s a wonderful moment for Berlin. A truly historic moment.”
There were tears in his eyes.
Momper said he’d always believed the Wall would topple one day, but he admitted there were times when he’d despaired of it ever happening in his lifetime. Seven months earlier, Communist leader Erich Honecker had even boasted that the Berlin Wall would “last for another 100 years.”
Now, West Berliners were pulling East Berliners to the top of the barrier along which, in earlier years, dozens of people had been shot trying to escape. The crowd tooted trumpets and danced in gay abandon atop the barrier, embracing one another warmly.
It was a sharp contrast to Aug. 17, 1962, when 19-year-old East Berliner Peter Fetchter was shot and wounded while trying to scale the barrier, screaming “help me, help me,” while helpless West Berlin police could only throw first aid packets over the barricade to him, watching for 50 minutes as Fetchter bled to death.
Now, the Berlin Wall was finally being made redundant. Berlin was de facto being “reunited.”
Plain curious, East Berliners began spilling out into the streets of West Berlin, popping their noses into bars, strip joints and night clubs for a horn-honking bash that continued until well past dawn.
Most of the revelers returned home later.
“I’m just happy that at last I can visit places beyond the Wall and, that finally, I can now visit other states instead of just seeing them on TV or hearing about them,” a 53-year-old engineer from Berlin’s Prenzlauerberg district said.
Egon Krenz, briefly East German head of state in 1989, had given his blessing earlier that day to a set of new travel regulations designed to pacify the state’s disgruntled citizens, thousands of whom had fled to the West via Hungary and Czechoslovakia in the turbulent summer and autumn of 1989.
The plan was not for the new regulations to go into force at once, but the following day, Nov. 10.
However, government spokesman Guenter Schabowski had missed large parts of the meeting where the decision was made. Therefore, when he appeared at a regular press conference for updates on the East German government’s attempts at reform, he was unaware of the timing of the new policy.
Which meant when reporters asked him toward the end of the conference when the easing of the travel restrictions would go into force, Schabowski was left to reply, somewhat hesitantly: “As far as I’m aware, immediately.”
Thus, Schabowksi “accidentally” triggered one of the most momentous events of German history — the fall of the Berlin Wall.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS