Freedom from sabotage
Dear Johnny,
Someone has sabotaged your viewer counter. When I first saw your article “Hogwash + whitewash = whiteout” (Feb. 21, page 8) and saw that I was the first reader, I couldn’t and wouldn’t believe it, so I opened three different browsers and went back to the column. Yup, zero views.
Now, if you get paid by the number of views your column gets, your paycheck is going to be a big fat NT$0. I am a US-based fan and look for your latest column all the time. I worry your boss is going to get pressure from the “Ma Mob” to silence “The Neihoo Dragon” — and one of the last democratic voices in Taiwan will disappear.
But even Taiwan may disappear if the editorial writer at the China Post who wrote the editorial “Freedom, the natural enemy of Taiwan’s independence” (Feb. 20) has his or her way.
I would only ask: Freedom to be a communist? Freedom to not be Taiwanese? These are not good choices as far as I can see.
Johnny ... you’ve got a lot of work to do.
D. BUTLER
Johnny replies: Look, D, I have as much computer literacy as a skink and even less interest. What I can tell you is that I am not paid by page views, but if I were I would ensure that the words “teen sex” appeared in all of the titles.
Do you doubt this wisdom? Look up my archive.
As for the unholy United Front that threatens us all, you’re right: I have a lot of work to do. Starting with finding a skink willing to teach me about computers.
Stupidification
Dear Johnny,
On the Taipei Times story “Environmentalist aims to fight desert’s expansion” (March 18, page 4), I would like to know more about Wender Yang (楊文德), this bold “Taiwanese” who cares so much for China’s deserts. Doesn’t China care about Xinjiang or are the Chicoms so intelligent that they have to find a Taiwanese to work on their deserts?
His actions somehow remind me of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation and its venerable master Cheng Yen (證嚴). When there is a disaster in China, the omnipresent blue-dressed benevolents of Tzu Chi always ask for money and make big donations to China!
They seem to overlook the Taiwan-China rivalry and forget that China spends so much money developing weapons and military plans to use them against Taiwan.
Okay, Buddhism’s message is love — but surely not stupidity.
I would suggest to Mr Yang and the Tzu Chi Foundation that they look after Taiwan’s ecological emergencies, poverty and other social problems. What about you, Johnny?
STEVE TSO
France
Johnny replies: Actually, I’m going to take a conciliatory stance on this one. Growing deserts are nobody’s friend, Steve, especially if they belong to a country next door.
And I think you’re being hard on the Tzu Chi people. Most of the recipients of their labors are victims of the state as well as the forces of nature.
Notable germanclature
Dear Johnny,
Excellent piece, mein Herr (“Abbreviated development, ROC on!”, March 7, page 8).
CECA, ECFA ... whatever. Excrement by any other name stinks just the same.
FREIHERR VON BELCHENPHART
Mount Vernon, Washington
Johnny replies: Silly me ... I thought this loyal reader was using a trick name until I came across Karl-Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jacob Philipp Franz Joseph Sylvester Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg, the German economics and technology minister.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS