First came the imperial marching music and a fiery explosion.
“You've watched snippets of them for days, or meant to after your friends sent you the link,” a voice boomed with mock gravity. “Tonight, the week-long feud of the century comes to a head.”
It was a comically absurd drum roll for what, on the surface, was merely a squabble between TV presenters. In one corner, Jim Cramer, the closest thing to a celebrity in US financial journalism. In the opposite corner, Jon Stewart, the satirist and host of the fake news program The Daily Show on Comedy Central. But unlike many a big fight, this one more than surpassed the hype. Nothing less than financial reporting itself was put on trial — and found severely wanting.
Cramer, who dispenses raucous advice to investors on the Mad Money show on the business channel CNBC, was eviscerated by a serious and genuinely angry Stewart. Meek and contrite, Cramer was pummeled like a rope-a-dope over his profession's failure to be an effective watchdog of Wall Street. There was no corner man to throw in the towel.
The interview was one of those classic television moments that crystallized the public mood in the credit crisis. Stewart articulated the anger and bewilderment of millions of Americans who now feel ripped off and afraid. He framed the question that everyone wanted asked — how were the financial masters of the universe allowed to pursue their ruinous behavior unchallenged for so long?
The interview has burnished Stewart's reputation as the last best hope in the media when it comes to, in the earnest phrase of news network CNN, “keeping them honest.”
It was this comedian who, like a court jester, told uncomfortable truths about the Iraq War when the mainstream media was playing cheerleader. Now, as the financial apocalypse unfolds, it is Stewart again who is scything through the herd mentality and culture of deference.
James Moore, a former TV news correspondent and co-author of the bestseller Bush's Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential, blogged: “I am inclined to wonder if there is a line somewhere in the Book of Revelation that proclaims 'and a comic shall lead them.' Jon Stewart has set new standards for both comedy and journalism on television.”
“Oddly, he was originally supposed to just make us laugh on Comedy Central,” Moore wrote. “He's done that, quite proficiently, but Stewart has also figured out that some jokes are sad as well as too important not to tell. But he's not supposed to be doing the job of reporters.”
His assault on Wall Street began in earnest with a classic Daily Show technique — a series of juxtaposed clips revealing incompetence and hypocrisy. First, there was Rick Santelli, a CNBC reporter who tried to strike a populist chord by launching a sudden rant on a trading floor. Stewart, unimpressed, forensically dissected the channel's past mistakes, in which it made exuberantly bullish statements about the market and various investment banks shortly before they collapsed.
Stewart added with his customary caustic wit: “If I only followed CNBC's advice. I'd have a million dollars today — provided I'd started with US$100 million.”
Such is his influence that in the next ratings Mad Money went down 10 percent in the 25 to 54 years old demographic. But Cramer, a former hedge fund manager, is not one to take barbs lying down. Known for his hyperactive style, he declared war with the sarcastic riposte: “Oh, oh, a comedian is attacking me! Wow! He runs a variety show!”
Stewart aired still more clips of Cramer advising his viewers to pile into Bear Stearns shares in the weeks before the bank collapsed, rendering them worthless. As the media stoked up the row, the date was set for a “showdown” last Thursday.
Stewart showed attack-dog interviewing instincts. He charged that people at CNBC knew what was going on behind the scenes on Wall Street, but failed to tell the public. He accused CNBC hosts and pundits of abandoning their journalistic duties and acting like cheerleaders for the market.
Cramer proffered feeble mea culpas and acknowledged they could do better. But the merciless Stewart produced damning footage of a 2006 interview with thestreet.com, in which Cramer described, in a positive way, certain barely legal things a hedge fund manager might do to work the market to his advantage.
Stewart pressed: “I understand you want to make finance entertaining. But it's not a fucking game. And when I watch that, I can't tell you how angry that makes me.”
He launched an eloquent assault that struck at the very foundations of the US financial press and television.
“Listen, you knew what the banks were doing, yet were touting it for months and months — the entire network was,” he said. “For now, to pretend that this was some sort of crazy, once-in-a-lifetime tsunami that nobody could have seen coming is disingenuous at best and criminal at worst.”
The interview became an online sensation and created a buzz that reached the White House briefing room. Press secretary Robert Gibbs said he had spoken to US President Barack Obama about watching the Stewart-Cramer showdown.
“Despite, even as Mr Stewart said, that it may have been uncomfortable to conduct and uncomfortable to watch, I thought it was — I thought somebody asked a lot of tough questions,” the spokesman said.
Cramer said: “Although, I was clearly outside of my safety zone, I have the utmost respect for this person and the work that they do, no matter how uncomfortable it was.”
Andrew Leckey, a former CNBC host and now president of the Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism at Arizona State University, said: “In a tremendous boom period, they covered the boom and people wanted to believe in the boom. They didn't uncover the lies that were told to them. Nobody did. But they should be held to a higher responsibility.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS