Although the proportion of women in the legislature has reached 30 percent, all the participants in the Mar. 9 presidential candidate debate were male: the two candidates, the host and the questioners. Women's issues and gender issues were not mentioned once.
In the two televised debates and one platform press conference, the main issues have been centered on cross-straits relations, foreign affairs, national security, the common market proposal, leadership styles and other issues traditionally perceived as being important national concerns.
The only topic that could possibly be seen as as a "women's issue" and which was barely mentioned, was the birth rate. Ironically, this issue was raised not because of a concern about women's development, but because the overall birth rate is too low and people are worried that women do not want children.
This is yet another reminder that politics in Taiwan is still a man's business; women have no real influence on key decisions.
Gender equality, however, is integral to democratic politics. Women's issues and gender viewpoints should be included when important national policies are decided. Issues that have long been promoted by women's civic groups include establishing a top level inter-governmental gender equality commission in the Cabinet and the formation of policies for public child care. Unfortunately, other than declarations on Women's Day by the two parties, these suggestions were not included in the debate topics.
When we further examine the "women's policies" of the two candidates, we discover that although both the pan-blue and pan-green camps have absorbed the various suggestions of civic women's groups in their policy proposals, their childcare policies only focus on providing cash allowances for child-minders or salary subsidies for parents who must take time from their work to care for their children. Long term planning on the issue of public child-care has been ignored.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) has not reached a breakthrough on the issue of labor rights for Chinese spouses and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has not clarified which level of the Cabinet his proposed gender equality organization would belong to.
Important national policies concerning demographics, health care, transportation, police and education still appear to ignore gender and women's issues. A gender equality commission within the Cabinet is needed to integrate the women's and gender policies that are currently among various agencies and ministries.
Hopefully organizers of televised presidential debates in the future will consider more diverse gender representation both in the procedures and questions. Gender issues are an important national concern. We also expect the two candidates to be more humble and liberal in terms of women's and gender issues in the future.
Fan Yun is the president of the Awakening Foundation and an assistant professor of sociology at National Taiwan University. Tseng Chao-yuan is secretary-general of the foundation.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS