The Chinese edition of Mao: The Unknown Story, written by Jung Chang (張戎) and her husband Jon Halliday, was released in Taiwan last month. This biography about former Chinese Communist Party chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東) should be judged as a historical work, but has received more attention in Taiwan for the controversy it generated in the publishing scene earlier this year.
The incident has blown over, but issues deserving of serious attention remain to be clarified. Former National Revolutionary Army and Republic of China Army general Hu Zongnan's (胡宗南) offspring may have focused on whether or not the book describes Hu correctly, but the ultimate question that the great majority of readers are interested in is the same question that the authors ask in the book: what is Mao's true face?
The reason this question is so important is because Mao's image remains a substantive symbol of legitimacy for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). As a result, books that portray Mao in a negative light, such as Chang's book and Li Zhisui's (
The CCP knows that if Mao's actions were to be judged as wrong, then former Chinese leaders such as Liu Shaoqi (
This is why Mao is still worshipped by the CCP, and as long as he remains a demigod, the CCP will be built on a foundation of superstition and myth.
Hungarian-born writer Arthur Koestler's well-known 1941 novel Darkness at Noon is set in the 1930s during the Stalinist purges promulgated by the Soviet Communist Party and reflects the public's deep-seated fear of living under communist rule.
The beginning of the book tells the story of Rubashov, who is arrested by authorities while sleeping. Rubashov is jailed and then sentenced to be executed by a firing squad.
While waiting to die, he realizes that the source of the terror Joseph Stalin -- the former general secretary of the Soviet Union's Communist Party -- inspires results from the institutionalized belief that he is forever right.
Thus, people executed under Stalin should admit that he is right even at the point when bullets enter their bodies.
Over the past five decades, Beijing has executed and imprisoned millions of Chinese people in a series of so-called reforms and revolutions. Although these multitudes are dead and buried, history has yet to render a verdict on their deaths.
This can be attributed to the continuation of the myth that Chairman Mao, the CCP's eternal "Number One," was infallible, and thus gives legitimacy to the CCP.
Chang's careful research reveals Mao as an inflexible tyrant constantly obsessed with mind games and wielding power. But her description of Mao does not truly reflect the dark side of his character. This fault means that many readers still have no idea of how such a calculating strategist could so easily become the "big brother" of hundreds of millions of Chinese people.
Many Western academics have conducted research into Mao's life. However, most have not focused on analyzing the Chinese style of cultural politics that informed Mao's views.
Earlier China experts, such as Benjamin Schwartz, Stuart Schram and Lucian Pye, or more recently Ross Terrill and Jonathan Spence, have all written biographies about Mao, but each has emphasized different aspects of his life, and thus the complete picture of his dark side has yet to be disclosed.
Li Fu-chung is a professor at the Graduate Institute of Taiwanese History at Chengchi University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Daniel Cheng
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
RSS