Champagne corks are popping around Hong Kong as the economy booms and property prices surge, if you believe what the financial analysts say.
Talk to wine merchants, however, and they will tell you a different story. Despite the rosy economic outlook, fine wine sales are strangely flat and only one person in 100 is a wine drinker.
The key reason, they believe, is the punishing 80 percent tax which means that a bottle of red wine that costs US$10 in Australia costs nearly US$20 in Hong Kong.
While global consumption of wine has surged strongly, sales in Hong Kong are stagnating, with the weak US dollar Hong Kong's currency is pegged to pushing Australian and European wine up higher.
Paul Liversedge, general manager of the 12-branch Watson's Wine Cellar chain, says that situation is unlikely to change while tax remains at current levels.
Finance Secretary Henry Tang (
"There are an awful lot of people in Hong Kong who still do not drink wine and I am sure they are put off by the prices," he said.
"Personally, I think the rate of duty should be reduced from 80 percent to 40 percent," Liversedge said.
"If tax was brought down, more people could afford to buy wine. Wine consumption would go right up," he said.
"You would have a lot of new customers who don't buy wine yet because it's too expensive. People who buy it now at lower prices would be able to afford to try better wines," he said.
Liversedge said there had been rumors within the industry around Christmas that the tax on wine would be lowered in this month's budget but those rumors had since ebbed ominously away.
Linda Tsui, brand manager of speciality wine shop Boutique Wines said: "It is a hope rather than an expectation, but it might happen."
"In the past the government has increased and decreased wine duty," she said.
The case for decreasing the duty on wine became stronger as Hong Kong people travel more and see the same wines on sale for much less in overseas countries.
"The more people travel, the more they compare prices," Tsui said.
Prices in the territory are so high that some wine lovers go to the trouble of getting an import license and shipping in their own wine to avoid the hefty tax.
"If you drink a lot of wine it actually makes financial sense to do that," Tsui said.
Even though the economy had improved, Tsui said, people were not willing to spend money on something if they considered it poor value.
"The economy this year is better than last year and people are willing to spend more but still people are not back to the way they were years ago in terms of their buying patterns," she said.
"People are cautious because they have seen what can happen in a downturn," she said.
Tommy Lau, general manager of Hong Kong importers and distributors Nathan Fine Wines, said: "My personal view is that it would be reasonable to reduce the duty from 80 percent to 60 or even 40 percent.
"Almost every day people are complaining about the high price of wine in Hong Kong. Many people compare Hong Kong with Singapore," he said.
"Singapore now is using a very simple tax system with a flat rate. They only charge S$3 [US$1.84] or S$4 per bottle," he said.
"In Hong Kong, if you buy a reasonably good wine with an import price of HK$200 [US$25.60] then you will need to pay another HK$160 to the government," Lau said.
"If we had the Singapore system you would only pay another HK$20 or so for each bottle. That is a huge difference," he said.
Lau argued: "People in Hong Kong are starting to get into the habit of drinking wine. If you want to have more and more income for the Hong Kong government then you need to entice more people to drink wine.
"The best way to entice them is to reduce the price to make it more attractive," he said.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then