If Nazi Germany could be transformed into a flourishing democracy, so peace-loving it angered its erstwhile US occupiers by refusing to back their war in the Gulf, the same should be possible for Baathist Iraq.
Indeed, many Iraqi exiles believe the denazification of Germany should serve as a model for how to purge and punish members of former president Saddam Hussein's Baath party and build democracy.
Some 8.5 million Germans -- well over a tenth of the population -- belonged to Adolf Hitler's Nazi party. At least a million of Iraq's 26 million people were full Baath party members, although many more were registered as supporters.
Germany's Western occupiers divided Nazis into five categories ranging from "major offenders" to "persons exonerated" on the basis of detailed questionnaires. By 1949, tribunals had heard almost a million cases, 22,000 Nazis had lost their public-sector jobs and 9,000 were jailed.
Angela Borgstedt, a Karlsruhe University historian, said the process was so overwhelming that lesser offenders were tried first and interest waned before many top Nazis were punished.
"It was very cumbersome and they tried to get results as quickly as possible which led to more serious cases being delayed and they then profited from later amnesties," she said.
But Borgstedt said the process was still valuable.
"Those who took part said it was important that the attempt was made. At least for the 10 to 15 minutes it took to fill out the questionnaire they were confronted with their own past," she said.
Pro-American Iraqi politician Ahmad Chalabi has called for the "de-Baathification" of Iraq, warning of violence if top officials are not held to account.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, set up to hunt and prosecute the Nazis behind the Holocaust, proposes that a US-led military court should try Iraqis in Baghdad, based on the Nuremberg Tribunal which sentenced top Nazis to death.
US-led forces have detained about a third of the officials on a list of 55 most wanted Iraqis and are holding up to 7,500 prisoners of war. They have suggested that Iraqis set up their own special court to try those accused of crimes.
General Tommy Franks, the US commander in Iraq, said on May 11 that the Baath party, founded in Syria during World War II, had been dissolved in Iraq.
Despite a desire to replace the old guard with exiles, Iraq's occupiers have reinstated much of the police force and asked government workers to return to work to restore order and public services. They have demanded that top ministry officials sign a document denouncing the party that had ruled Iraq since 1968.
German historians warn against trying to purge every Baath member and say Iraq's occupiers should focus on top figures.
Whatever process is adopted, it must be consistent to win acceptance, unlike in Germany, where policies varied across the four occupation zones and the focus waned from 1948 as the Cold War began and Communism replaced Nazism as the main enemy.
Many Nazis who lost their jobs after the war were later reinstated, prompting a home-grown second wave of denazification in the late 1960s as German students demanded a new purge. German school books only mentioned the Holocaust from the 1970s.
"It is important to pursue war criminals but its success depends whether it is driven by the population so that people become aware of what democracy and human rights mean," said Juliana Wetzel from Berlin's Center for Anti-Semitism Research.
"If it is driven by the occupying powers there will always be a suspicion of victors' justice as there was in Germany," Wetzel said.
Exiles see Baathism under Saddam as a dangerous ideology that promoted aggressive Arab nationalism, militarism and repression of Kurds and Shiites. But regional experts dispute that Baathism was as pernicious as Nazism.
Sonja Hegasy, from the Center for Modern Oriental Studies in Berlin, said many Iraqis joined the Baath party only to get ahead: "The Baath party cannot be compared to the Nazi party with its contempt for mankind and concentration camps."
Mustafa Alani, a London-based Iraqi analyst at the Royal Services Institute, said only about 10 percent of Baath members were ideologically committed. "The party has no chance of surviving Saddam's downfall," he said.
Even if the Baath party is less well rooted than Nazism was, it will be much harder to build democracy after 35 years of Baath rule than it was after 12 years of Nazi dictatorship.
The German population was war weary and had none of Iraq's ethnic or religious divides. The Allies could also draw on a reserve of democratic politicians from the pre-Hitler era.
"In Iraq, there doesn't seem to be this foundation on which to build a democracy so the pressure from outside will have to be much, much stronger," said Dieter Dowe, a historian at the Friedrich Ebert Institute in Bonn.
Asked in 1945 how long US soldiers would stay in Germany, President Franklin D. Roosevelt replied: "A year, two years at the most".
Their grandchildren are still there, 58 years on.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then