The Executive Yuan yesterday passed a set of legislative amendments canceling tax exemptions for people serving in the military as well as elementary and high school faculty and staff members. At the same time, however, the Executive Yuan also agreed to demands from the Ministry of National Defense and Ministry of Education asking for "salary subsidies" for service members and education-sector workers. The defense ministry wants salary hikes worth an annual NT$5 billion, while the education ministry is seeking an additional NT$10 billion in its budget. Canceling the tax exemptions will increase the government's tax revenues by NT$13 billion, according to estimates by the Ministry of Finance. Approving the ministries' subsidy requests would cost NT$15 billion. Doesn't sound like a good deal for the Executive Yuan.
The tax exemptions for service members and education-sector workers have been in place for several decades. They used to be seen as political tools, but recent changes in Taiwan's political environment have made it impossible to control and use service members and teachers as election pawns. Public awareness of fair taxation is also rising. Public opinion polls have consistently shown more than 80 percent of respondents support ending these exemptions, even a majority of service people and teachers.
But cancelling the exemptions should not be linked to the two ministries' requests for subsidies. Service people and education-sector workers already enjoy higher salaries than most civil servants. The erstwhile reasons for tax exemptions -- low salaries -- no longer exists. According to Central Personnel Administration statistics, the monthly salary of a lieutenant general in the army is NT$3,000 more than an equivalent "Level 13" official in the civil service. Elementary and high school teachers who have taught for 15 years or more get NT$5,000 more per month than other civil servants with the same length of service.
Government finances are in dire straits, with accumulated debts of more than NT$3 trillion. The government's debt load continues to increase each year. The Executive Yuan should not rush to let go of any opportunity to increase tax revenues.
The Cabinet is now asking its agencies not to increase spending unless they can come up with a comparable increase in income. And yet it appears willing to give up the additional tax revenues it would gain from eliminating the exemptions.
Teachers' and servicemembers' organizations are asking for increases in specific areas of their salary structures. The military is asking for more risk compensation and extra pay for being assigned to offshore islands. The education sector wants more extra pay for counseling and guidance work. While adjustments may be needed in some areas, such changes should be determined by the Central Personnel Administration, not linked to tax issues.
The tax exemptions for service people and education-sector workers have long been a headache for the government. The government is facing a situation and conditions that are very different from the past. It should decisively cancel unfair tax exemptions or incentives and delink salary hikes and subsidies from such cancelations.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS