Within one short week, President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen told the Taipei Times during an exclusive talk that he was unhappy with Kim's pandering to China in order to implement his "Sunshine Policy" toward North Korea. Chen also remarked that "they [South Korea] wants everything, shows no goodwill [toward Taiwan]."
On Wednesday Chen told a visiting delegation of South Korean lawmakers that resumption of air links between the two countries' national airlines would be based on 'respect for Taiwan's national integrity, substantive interests and mutuality and equality.
Once, Chen was very friendly toward Seoul. He has visited South Korea twice to accept honorary degrees. He also met Kim, whom he described as "the most-respected political statesman of Asia." During his presidential election campaign, Chen also listed immediate resumption of direct air links with South Korea as one of his goals. Obviously, his favorable impression was based on ignorance.
Chen's recent criticism of South Korea was probably prompted by rage. Was he upset by South Korea's refusal to allow first lady Wu Shu-chen (
In any event, equality and mutuality are the most fundamental bases of a bilateral relationship between two countries. In the 10 years since direct air links with South Korea were severed, Taiwan has heard South Korean visitors' demands for resumption of such links. However, no one has ever heard them talk about what is in it for Taiwan. Taiwan was the victim in the termination of the diplomatic relationship between the two countries. What exactly does Seoul think Taiwan is when it makes such boorish demands? Does it consider Taiwan its colony or appendage?
From Taiwan's perspective, South Korea has more to gain from the resumption of direct air links. All Taiwan will get is the threat of an even more serious trade deficit with South Korea. Last year's deficit was more than US$6 billion, second only to Taiwan's trade deficit with Japan. Seoul has never shown any serious concern about easing the deficit. Taiwan has ample grounds to demand that the deficit be dealt with.
It is to be hoped that Chen's anger will lead South Korea to try to see things from Taiwan's perspective for a change. Some goodwill and respect would go a long way in improving relations -- as would putting an end to making demands without offering anything in return. Otherwise, South Korea's bad conduct will only increase the resentment of Taiwanese.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS