During a briefing for President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), Taiwan's ambassador to Nicaragua, Antonio Tsai (蔡德三), candidly pointed out in front of the Taiwan delegation and media that Nicaraguan President Arnoldo Aleman has been repeatedly accused of corruption and suppressing the political opposition.
Tsai's candid and public comments shocked the media present, caused Chen to tighten his eyebrows and almost gave Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Hung-mao
Ambassadors have traditionally been defined as people "who go abroad to lie on behalf of their country." Tsai's statement -- the kind usually uttered behind closed doors -- demonstrated an unusual type of diplomacy.
But bluntness appeared to be the order of the day in Nicaragua -- where the national media labeled Chen's visit "monetary diplomacy," Nicaraguan workers staged protests against what they labeled exploitation by Taiwanese businessmen and Nicaragua's foreign minister reminded the Taiwanese visitors of an unmet promise of US$100 million in aid. Such bluntness appeared to cast a shadow over Chen's visit.
Because of Taiwan's diplomatically isolated position, only 29 countries maintain ties with Taipei. Most of them are in South and Central America, and Africa. Many of our allies are economically weak, some are in a state of civil war. Politically, they are mostly either totalitarian or infant democracies. In these countries, strongmen rule, human rights standards are less than ideal, and corruption is not considered news.
Our diplomatic ties have made for strange bedfellows and put the new government -- with its push for "human rights diplomacy" -- in a very awkward position. Taiwan cannot afford to pick and choose her friends. Therefore, the government must avoid touching on issues relating to human right condition of our allies and offer humanitarian aid through NGOs. There is no way around it.
It is difficult for Taiwan to have any "presentable" friends. Like the "rice-bowl Christians" encountered by missionaries in China, many of Taiwan's friends want something substantial in return for their friendship -- either aid or loans. And, as often is the case in "politically underdeveloped" countries, some of those funds have flowed directly, or indirectly, into the pocket of certain key politicians.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is not blind to this state of affairs. This is why it tries to avoid direct linkages with aid packages, so that diplomatic ties are not severed once power changes hand in an allied government. MOFA now carefully evaluates the plans for aid submitted by these countries an effort to make sure Taiwan's money doesn't go to waste, either by ending up in an individual's pocket or and with the breaking of diplomatic ties if there is a power shift.
Some may criticize the government for getting on its human rights hobby horse while still shaking hands with countries notorious for their human rights violations. But in the harsh reality of international relations, morals and human rights are not the only criteria for friendship. Look at the US' relations with Nicaragua, its cozy relationship with the dictator Samoza and its undeclared war against the Sandanistas.
Tsai has opened a Pandora's box. As Chen's comment on Tsai's briefing put it, the truth "does not make anyone feel better." However, it hasn't been long since Nicaragua left behind a totalitarian regime to start down the road toward democracy. Taiwan has no reason to be harsh about the current condition of Nicaragua or withdraw from the country. Just the opposite. Taiwan is obligated to offer our friend a helping hand in its time of need. Now that Taiwan is firmly standing on her own feet, she must help her friend to do so. Just because so many others have been fair weather friends of Taiwan is no reason for us to act the same way.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.