The International Monetary Fund is desperate to change itself into the universal bankruptcy court for sovereign nations. The IMF needs a new gig, having failed at practically every other one it has tried.
The IMF was invented to help operate the Bretton Woods architecture of fixed exchange rates. The plan was that the IMF could extend special loans to member countries having trouble keeping their currencies pegged to the dollar under the auspices of the Bretton Woods Agreement. The IMF would lend the ammunition needed for currency-embattled nations to fire back at the foreign exchange market.
Bretton Woods ended in a series of spectacular currency crises in the early 1970s. IMF or no IMF, the system would have exploded. I blame not so much the IMF, but the concept of fixed exchange rates itself.
Blame the IMF for extending the time when the world was harnessed to the Bretton Woods system. Had the IMF never been invented, the Bretton Woods system would have disappeared much earlier. And a good riddance it would have been to have seen it go sooner.
Any way you look at it, the mission to create stability in world exchange rates via fixed exchange rates was a suicide mission right from before it started.
Mission number two began in 1995 when the IMF, prompted by the Clinton Administration, became the sovereign catastrophe ambulance service to the world. Mexico was the first client.
Others, namely Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, South Korea, Brazil, Argentina, Turkey and many others followed soon.
And that's the thing about becoming the lender of last resort: There is never any shortage of customers. You could measure the objective success of such a dubious function as the minimization of new cases. The only lender of last resort that is a success is the one that gives out no loans.
The IMF, as bailout king, has never had any problem finding new customers. For this reason I say the IMF has failed in its second incarnation. As when it played the role of bulwark to Bretton Woods, the IMF has failed in its attempt to eliminate or even ameliorate financial crisis.
Yet the task of lender of last resort may simply be beyond the IMF, or beyond the capacity of any organization.
No sympathy for the IMF, please, because it volunteers for impossible tasks. The playbill calls for the IMF to fail and then change itself to try another impossible task. The IMF is like a phoenix, the mythical bird that rises from its own ashes.
It's worse, actually. I can't resist borrowing a line from Saul Bellow. One of Bellow's characters describes himself as a "phoenix that chases after arsonists." And you didn't know Bellow wrote about international finance! The latest proposal for a new IMF comes from Deputy Managing Director Anne Krueger. Toward the end of last year Krueger made herself the bane -- if not ridicule -- of the international financial community by proposing that the IMF act as the bankruptcy court for sovereign nations.
Krueger seems stuck on the idea that the existing international courts are unable to handle bankruptcy on a national level. Hence she wants the IMF to step into the role.
According to Krueger, the Fund would even have the power to announce standstills on the payment of interest and principle. It would also have the power to enforce capital controls.
On April 1, Krueger stepped back a few feet by reducing the proposed role of the IMF. She said insolvent countries should work out their own terms with bondholders without -- as her original proposal had stipulated -- the IMF deciding when a country can't pay its creditors. Still, the IMF footprint would be large in the scale of things.
The IMF proposal calls for its 183 member nations to change their laws so a majority of creditors -- rather than all -- can agree on a restructuring agreement such as a debt swap. Excuse me but that is an abrogation of private property rights.
I have a far simpler idea. Rather than change the IMF, why not close it down? That's right, shut it down. Close the doors and give back the capital to the nations that are in effect the IMF's shareholders.
Probably can't get many nations to agree to that. So here is my second counter. If we can't directly shut the IMF down, then the US ought to withdraw as a member nation. And when that is done we should start to think about getting out of the World Bank.
David DeRosa, president of DeRosa Research & Trading, is also an adjunct finance professor at Yale School of Management and the author of In Defense of Free Capital Markets.
‘UPHOLDING PEACE’: Taiwan’s foreign minister thanked the US Congress for using a ‘creative and effective way’ to deter Chinese military aggression toward the nation The US House of Representatives on Monday passed the Taiwan Conflict Deterrence Act, aimed at deterring Chinese aggression toward Taiwan by threatening to publish information about Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials’ “illicit” financial assets if Beijing were to attack. The act would also “restrict financial services for certain immediate family of such officials,” the text of the legislation says. The bill was introduced in January last year by US representatives French Hill and Brad Sherman. After remarks from several members, it passed unanimously. “If China chooses to attack the free people of Taiwan, [the bill] requires the Treasury secretary to publish the illicit
A senior US military official yesterday warned his Chinese counterpart against Beijing’s “dangerous” moves in the South China Sea during the first talks of their kind between the commanders. Washington and Beijing remain at odds on issues from trade to the status of Taiwan and China’s increasingly assertive approach in disputed maritime regions, but they have sought to re-establish regular military-to-military talks in a bid to prevent flashpoint disputes from spinning out of control. Samuel Paparo, commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, and Wu Yanan (吳亞男), head of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Southern Theater Command, talked via videoconference. Paparo “underscored the importance
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
RSS