Investors were growing optimistic that US President Donald Trump’s trade wars had started to calm down. His latest tariff broadsides quickly disabused them of that notion.
Initial agreements with the UK and China buoyed hopes on Wall Street and in corporate boardrooms that the US president was starting to peel back the highest US tariffs in nearly a century.
However, Friday delivered a harsh reminder of Trump’s volatile policymaking and penchant for brinkmanship, when he threatened a 50 percent tariff on the EU and a 25 percent levy on smartphones if companies including Apple Inc and Samsung Electronics Co failed to move production to the US.
Photo: AFP
Equities fell across the globe, the US dollar slumped to its lowest level since 2023 and business leaders were left to grapple with the notion that Trump-generated uncertainty is here to stay.
“Today’s news that Trump is threatening enormous tariffs on the EU and is singling out Apple as a firm are examples of what we should expect for the next two months if not for the rest of the year,” Peterson Institute for International Economics executive vice president Marcus Noland said. “Peace has not broken out.”
A White House official said that the US president was hoping to sign more trade agreements with some major economies and then fast-track deals with others during a 90-day pause on his tariffs announced on April 2.
Some arrangements are said to be close, including one with India, US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent told Fox News on Friday.
Business leaders and consumers would be watching carefully for next steps. The US president’s Friday directive on the EU offered a preview of what he said his administration might do with dozens of trading partners seeking lower duties: Simply dictate tariff levels.
Trump ally Steve Bannon said the president’s reaction was in part due to what he saw as a lack of progress on trade issues last week at a G7 finance ministers meeting, particularly given the relatively quick deal he was able to strike with the UK.
Other countries without deals in progress should be worried, Bannon said, calling it a “storm warning.”
Trump seemed as committed to tariffs as ever. He threw his support behind a partnership between US Steel Corp and Japan’s Nippon Steel Corp, crediting his tariffs for finalizing the pact that had been in the works for years. That announcement came as Japanese trade negotiators were holding talks with US trade officials in Washington.
When Trump paused his higher April 2 tariffs, he left in place a 10 percent charge on most trading partners. Separate levies on steel, aluminum and autos remain. Trump has also promised a range of new import taxes on copper, semiconductor chips, pharmaceutical drugs, lumber and aircraft parts — all of which could drive up the total effective tariff rate.
At the same time, Trump showed a willingness to negotiate on duties imposed on specific sectors when the US and UK agreed to negotiate new rates on metals.
Tariff levels remain uncertain, but “will probably remain elevated for the foreseeable future,” Goldman Sachs Group Inc analysts wrote in a note on May 14.
The bank forecast that the effective US tariff rate would rise by 13 percentage points this year, to the highest level since the 1930s.
It could all be for naught, with Goldman saying “higher bilateral tariffs are unlikely to drive a substantial increase in domestic production,” a stated goal of Trump.
Talks are advancing with other partners including India, Japan, Vietnam and Israel. Some short-term relief could be possible, but the threat of fresh trade feuds is widespread across several countries.
Trump’s penchant for out-of-nowhere threats, even on countries with which the US has trade agreements, sows doubt in the longevity of any deal he strikes, Noland said.
“It’s really quite extraordinary that we had free-trade agreements with some of these countries — South Korea, Australia — and they’re just getting hit with tariffs,” Noland said. “His willingness to tear up previous agreements and ignore them has to be highly concerning for other countries.”
Ryanair, Transavia, Volotea and other low-cost airlines are feeling the financial pain from high jet fuel prices as a result of the Middle East war and are cutting flights. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has taken a huge chunk of oil supplies off the market, sending the price of jet fuel soaring and triggering fears of shortages that could force airlines to cancel flights. Airlines are not waiting for a lack of supplies to react. “Travel alert: Airlines are cutting thousands of flights right now,” Travel Therapy host Karen Schaler said in an Instagram reel this past weekend.
MANAGING RISKS: Taiwan has secured LNG sufficient to cover 95 percent of electricity demand for next month, UBS said, describing the government’s approach as proactive UBS Group AG has raised its forecast for Taiwan’s economic growth this year to 8 percent, up from 6.9 percent previously, and said expansion could reach as high as 8.6 percent if external energy shocks are avoided. The upgrade reflects a stronger-than-expected first-quarter performance and sustained momentum in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven exports, which UBS said are providing a firm foundation for growth despite geopolitical and energy risks. Taiwan’s GDP expanded 13.69 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, the fastest growth since the second quarter of 1987, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Thursday. On a seasonally
The Fair Trade Commission’s (FTC) ongoing review of Grab Holdings Ltd’s US$600 million acquisition of Foodpanda Taiwan’s operations, announced on March 23, has taken on fresh urgency as industry experts warn that the transaction could embed significant Chinese cybersecurity vulnerabilities into Taiwan’s digital infrastructure through Grab’s deep ties to autonomous-driving firm WeRide (文遠知行). Less than 16 months after the FTC blocked Uber Eats’ direct attempt to acquire Foodpanda Taiwan — citing potential combined market shares of 80 to 90 percent — the emergence of Grab as the buyer has prompted questions about whether the same competitive harm is simply being rerouted
The list of Asian stocks that benefit from business partnership with Nvidia Corp is getting longer, as the region further integrates into the artificial intelligence (AI) chip giant’s business ecosystem. Just in the past week, South Korea’s LG Electronics Inc, Taiwan’s Nanya Technology Corp (南亞科技), as well as China’s Huizhou Desay SV Automotive Co (德賽西威) and Pateo Connect Technology Shanghai Corp (博泰車聯) have become the latest to rally on news of tie-ups, supply-chain participation or product collaboration with the US chip designer. Asian suppliers account for about 90 percent of Nvidia’s production costs, up from about 65 percent last year, data compiled
RSS