Some of Japan’s most notable companies are feeling somewhat listless about being listed.
That might be the reason for the US$5 billion take-private offer for Taisho Pharmaceutical Co, the largest management buyout in Japanese history, announced last week.
With the founding Uehara family in control of a majority of shares, most expect the proposal to succeed even in the face of grumblings from minority shareholders, bringing to an end six decades as a public firm.
Photo: AP
Taisho might be the biggest, but is far from alone in choosing this path. Buyouts by management and controlling parties have surged this year in Japan, with the total value now set to pass ¥1 trillion (US$6.8 billion). Cram-school operator Benesse Holdings Inc and karaoke provider Shidax Corp are among firms also choosing to abandon public markets.
Expect this trend to continue: For many businesses, being public is no longer worth the hassle. For decades, a listing in Japan was easy street. Extensive cross-holdings ensured a compliant shareholder base; even if the domestic market was stagnant, the rise of China provided growth opportunities next door; and most of all, no one really expected stocks to deliver much of a return.
All that is changing. Now, everywhere management looks, there is a new annoyance. Activist investors are emboldened by recent successes and launching campaigns to bend boards to their will. The Tokyo Stock Exchange is increasingly breathing down executives’ necks, looking to nag them into compliance with the goal of boosting valuations. Who needs the hassle?
That might sum up the response of Tsuruha Holdings Inc. Despite victory against Oasis Management in the activist investor’s attempt to place directors on its board, the drugstore operator is reported to be talking to private-equity firms for a potential US$4 billion deal to take itself off the market. (Tsuruha says going private is nothing more than one option to boost shareholder value.)
The Tokyo Stock Exchange’s pressure campaign to enhance corporate returns and reduce the vast number of firms that trade below book value has been a key catalyst in the rally of Japanese stocks to new three-decade highs. A widely publicized revamp of markets last year was dismissed as a cosmetic exercise, but the bourse is now tightening the screws; next year, it plans to launch a “name and shame” list of firms that are not meeting its value goals.
Meanwhile, shareholder bases are being diversified with a gradual unwinding of cross-shareholdings. Toyota Motor Corp’s reported sale of a large chunk of its Denso Corp stake is the most high-profile example.
Combined with speculation that the Bank of Japan is nearing the end of its seven-year experiment with negative rates, and it encourages management to eye the exit.
Including other types of take-private deals, along with mergers and aquisitions and a reduction in “parent-child” listings, where the parent company and its subsidiary are both public, the number of listed companies in Tokyo is set to fall.
That is a good thing — the country has far too many listed that do not need to be.
The Prime segment of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, supposed to highlight the country’s best firms, has 1,655 constituents. That proliferation forces tracker funds to buy and sell highly illiquid stocks. About two-thirds of the country’s 4,000 or so listed firms have zero analyst coverage — heaven perhaps for value investors, but not for everyone. These little understood, albeit sometimes greatly undervalued companies drag down the broader indexes, leaving investors with the impression that Japanese stocks have little upside.
Compounding the problem is the fact that Japanese start-ups still often list too early, forcing them to focus too soon on profitability instead of growth. That is one reason the country has failed to produce a decacorn — a privately held company with a valuation that exceeds US$10 billion.
For many firms, there is little advantage to remaining public: Low rates make debt a more attractive option than dilutive share sales, while a once-lacking private equity sector has become increasingly sophisticated in the past decade, aiding businesses that need to be broken up and sold off.
When it comes to management buyouts, minority shareholders are frequently upset with the lack of a more transparent sales process — or a bidding war that could drive up valuations. Absent a well-coordinated activist campaign, these holders often have little choice but to accept what they are offered. The 55 percent premium from Taisho’s founding family might seem generous, but if a person was unfortunate enough to build their stake in 2018, they would need another 60 percent on top of that to break even.
However, that is partly explained by a particularly unique Japanese way of thinking about management’s responsibility to all stakeholders. Boards need to consider workers, suppliers and customers in their deliberations — invested parties would suffer if the firm was wound up and money returned to shareholders, as the business books would advise.
Consider the case of Culture Convenience Club Co, the operator of Japan’s equivalent of Blockbuster Video. Seeing the writing on the wall for that industry, it went private in 2011 in a ¥69.6 billion deal. It has since flourished as a unlisted firm, successfully pivoting to a line of upscale bookstores as demand for DVDs fell off. Blockbuster, of course, went under.
As pressure on boards intensifies, Tokyo is only likely to see more of them pursue this option.
The most-speculated-about of all potential deals is a long-rumored management buyout of SoftBank Group Corp by founder Masayoshi Son, who frequently complains that his company is undervalued by public markets.
Such a deal, if it ever materialized, would redefine how, and where, major firms see their future.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and South and North Korea. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief.
AI SPLURGE: The four major US tech companies have lost more than US$950 billion in value since releasing earnings and outlooks, while equipment makers were gaining Four of the biggest US technology companies together have forecast capital expenditures that would reach about US$650 billion this year — a flood of cash earmarked for new data centers and all the gear within them. The spending planned by Alphabet Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Meta Platforms Inc and Microsoft Corp, all in pursuit of dominance in the still-nascent market for artificial intelligence (AI) tools, is a boom without a parallel this century. Each of the companies’ estimates for this year is expected either near or surpass their budgets for the past three years combined. They would set a high-watermark for capital spending
China’s top chipmaker has warned that breakaway spending on artificial intelligence (AI) chips is bringing forward years of future demand, raising the risk that some data centers could sit idle. “Companies would love to build 10 years’ worth of data center capacity within one or two years,” Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯) cochief executive officer Zhao Haijun (趙海軍) said yesterday on a call with analysts. “As for what exactly these data centers will do, that hasn’t been fully thought through.” Moody’s Ratings projects that AI-related infrastructure investment would exceed US$3 trillion over the next five years, as developers pour eye-watering sums
Bank of America Corp nearly doubled its forecast for the nation’s economic growth this year, adding to a slew of upgrades even after a rip-roaring last year propelled by demand for artificial intelligence (AI). The firm lifted its projection to 8 percent from 4.5 percent on “relentless global demand” for the hardware that Taiwanese companies make, according to a note dated yesterday by analysts including Xiaoqing Pi (皮曉青). Taiwan’s GDP expanded 8.63 percent last year, the fastest pace since 2010. The increase “reflects our sustained optimism over Taiwan’s technology driven expansion and is reinforced by several recent developments,” including a more stable currency,
COLLABORATION: Taiwan and the US could jointly find solutions to weaknesses in supply chain resilience for critical materials, focusing on mining and initial refinement Taiwan is likely to purchase rare earths from the US in the future, and is also in talks with Australia and Canada to strengthen global rare earth supply chain security, Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said yesterday. Taiwan and the US last month concluded the sixth Economic Prosperity Partnership Dialogue, during which both sides signed a joint statement endorsing the principles of the Pax Silica Declaration, pledging to deepen cooperation in areas including critical minerals. At the time, Kung said the two sides would establish working groups to advance cooperation in areas including artificial intelligence, digital infrastructure, critical materials and