China delivered the latest salvo in an escalating semiconductor war with the US, announcing that Micron Technology Inc products have failed to pass a cybersecurity review in the country.
Operators of key infrastructure in China should not buy the company’s goods, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) said in a statement on Sunday, adding that it found “relatively serious” cybersecurity risks in Micron products sold in China.
The components caused “significant security risks to our critical information infrastructure supply chain,” which would affect national security, it said.
Photo: REUTERS
The results come more than a month after China announced an investigation on imports from the US’ largest memorychip maker.
The tech sector has become a key battlefield over national security between the two largest economies, with Washington having blacklisted Chinese tech firms, cut off the flow of sophisticated processors and banned its citizens from providing help to the Chinese chip industry.
Beijing’s conclusion had “no basis in fact,” and Washington would continue to limit industry disruptions with its allies, the US Department of Commerce said in a statement.
“No one should understand this decision by CAC as anything but retaliation for the US’s export controls on semiconductors,” said Holden Triplett, founder of Trenchcoat Advisors and a former FBI counterintelligence official in Beijing.
“No foreign business operating in China should be deceived by this subterfuge. These are political actions pure and simple, and any business could be the next one to be made an example of,” Triplett said.
The move brings fresh uncertainty to other US chipmakers that sell to China, the world’s biggest market for semiconductors.
Companies such as Qualcomm Inc, Broadcom Inc and Intel Corp deliver billions of chips to the country, which use the components in electronic products shipped all over the world.
The agency said that while the country welcomes products and services provided by companies of all countries as long as they comply with its laws and regulations, the investigation into Micron products is a “necessary measure” to safeguard national security.
It did not give detail on what the security risks were or identify which Micron products have been barred.
Micron, which had previously said it stood by the security of its products and commitments to customers, said in a statement on Sunday that it is evaluating the conclusion of the review.
The company is assessing its next steps, it said, adding that it looks forward “to continuing to engage in discussions with Chinese authorities.”
The agency’s move would likely have little effect on Micron, as the ban applies to “critical information infrastructure (CII),” Jefferies Group LLC analysts, including Edison Lee (李裕生), said in a research report, referring to operations such as data centers and cloud computing services with security risks.
Most of Micron’s memory chips sold in China are used in consumer electronics, such as smartphones and notebook computers, they said.
“We believe this ban is narrowly focused, as it applies to only CII operators,” they wrote. “Therefore, the ultimate impact on Micron will be quite limited.”
In the meantime, the Idaho-based chipmaker has been tightening ties with Japan. It is poised to get about ￥200 billion (US$1.5 billion) in financial incentives from the Japanese government to help it make next-generation memory chips in the country, Bloomberg reported.
Memory chips were already a flashpoint for US-China tensions. In December last year, Washington blacklisted Yangtze Memory Technologies Co (YMTC, 長江存儲), a state-backed flash memory chipmaker in Wuhan, China, effectively capping the country’s capabilities in advanced 3D Nand-style chips.
YMTC had been in talks to supply the components to Apple Inc for iPhone models before that development.
The majority of Micron’s products are made to industry standards, meaning the chips can easily be swapped out with those of rival manufacturers, such as Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc.
Those South Korean chipmakers have plants in China.
Memory chips are not usually considered a cybersecurity risk, because they do not require any specific software or run code. They are mostly basic grids of transistors used for storing data and have not typically been a vector of attack for hackers.
Micron derived nearly 11 percent of its revenue from China in its last fiscal year. While that is relatively low compared with other major tech firms, much of the world’s electronics production goes through Chinese factories in some way, and China’s move has the potential to harm Micron’s customer relationships.
Buyers in China could decide to play it safe after Beijing’s warning and move away from all products made by the US firm. That could divert business to Micron’s larger rivals, Samsung and Hynix.
With an approval rating of just two percent, Peruvian President Dina Boluarte might be the world’s most unpopular leader, according to pollsters. Protests greeted her rise to power 29 months ago, and have marked her entire term — joined by assorted scandals, investigations, controversies and a surge in gang violence. The 63-year-old is the target of a dozen probes, including for her alleged failure to declare gifts of luxury jewels and watches, a scandal inevitably dubbed “Rolexgate.” She is also under the microscope for a two-week undeclared absence for nose surgery — which she insists was medical, not cosmetic — and is
CAUTIOUS RECOVERY: While the manufacturing sector returned to growth amid the US-China trade truce, firms remain wary as uncertainty clouds the outlook, the CIER said The local manufacturing sector returned to expansion last month, as the official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) rose 2.1 points to 51.0, driven by a temporary easing in US-China trade tensions, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The PMI gauges the health of the manufacturing industry, with readings above 50 indicating expansion and those below 50 signaling contraction. “Firms are not as pessimistic as they were in April, but they remain far from optimistic,” CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said at a news conference. The full impact of US tariff decisions is unlikely to become clear until later this month
GROWING CONCERN: Some senior Trump administration officials opposed the UAE expansion over fears that another TSMC project could jeopardize its US investment Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is evaluating building an advanced production facility in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and has discussed the possibility with officials in US President Donald Trump’s administration, people familiar with the matter said, in a potentially major bet on the Middle East that would only come to fruition with Washington’s approval. The company has had multiple meetings in the past few months with US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and officials from MGX, an influential investment vehicle overseen by the UAE president’s brother, the people said. The conversations are a continuation of talks that
CHIP DUTIES: TSMC said it voiced its concerns to Washington about tariffs, telling the US commerce department that it wants ‘fair treatment’ to protect its competitiveness Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reiterated robust business prospects for this year as strong artificial intelligence (AI) chip demand from Nvidia Corp and other customers would absorb the impacts of US tariffs. “The impact of tariffs would be indirect, as the custom tax is the importers’ responsibility, not the exporters,” TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said at the chipmaker’s annual shareholders’ meeting in Hsinchu City. TSMC’s business could be affected if people become reluctant to buy electronics due to inflated prices, Wei said. In addition, the chipmaker has voiced its concern to the US Department of Commerce
RSS