Driverless vehicles, refrigerators that talk to toasters, breathtaking immersive reality, mind-blowing gaming experiences — 5G was going to enable it all, and telecoms were going to make a packet.
However, the reality is not so neat. The network that promised to be “not just another G” in Ericsson AB’s advertising has left many customers wondering what they are paying for.
Nonetheless, 5G was once again the central plank of the phone industry’s annual get-together, the MWC in Barcelona, Spain.
Photo: AFP
The event’s organizers proclaimed that 5G was “unlocking untapped value for all players across the entire ecosystem” and “redefining how the world connects.”
The hype came with a dose of reality from Orange SA chief executive officer Christel Heydemann.
Network operators were in peril, she told the MWC, because “massive network investments of almost 600 billion euros [US$640 billion] in Europe in the past decade happened to be hard to monetize.”
“And consumers expect to pay always less and get more,” she added.
Networks are not the only ones who might be rueing their big bet.
Ericsson, which supplies the equipment for 5G networks, has just laid off 8,500 people after profits slumped.
“5G has disappointed pretty much everybody — service providers and consumers, and it has failed to excite businesses,” Omdia research director Dario Talmesio said.
Talmesio said 5G was never really a consumer proposition, it was always more appropriate for businesses and industrial uses.
However, telecoms were unlikely to be seduced into investing billions only to improve connectivity in factories and ports, or help develop high-tech medical services.
Instead, they wrapped 5G in the kind of marketing that paints everything — even small improvements — as world-changing innovations.
Yet even now the benefits of 5G remain largely unclear to average smartphone users.
Thousands of US consumers told a survey last year that they were excited about the prospect of 5G, but when pressed, they had little idea what the benefits would be.
Most listed services that were already available with 4G, the survey of 10,000 US consumers by Israeli software company ironSource Ltd found.
This summarizes two of the main problems with 5G — 4G is good enough for most people, and 5G jargon is often impenetrable.
Terms like “low latency,” “network slicing,” “zero rating” and “massive IoT” are unlikely to get the pulse racing.
Despite its mass layoffs, Ericsson gave a huge floorspace at the MWC to 5G innovations, and insisted there would be no compromise on research and development.
“It is a platform for innovation. If you don’t do it, you don’t know what you miss out on,” Ericsson vice president Fredrik Jejdling said.
Frederique Liaigre, who runs Verizon Communications Inc’s business operation in France and other European countries, shares Jejdling’s enthusiasm, saying there was “no limit” to 5G’s potential.
Verizon was among the first to roll out 5G to customers in the US, and Liaigre concedes the business side is just getting started.
However, she regards her projects — such as providing a private 5G network to the port of Southampton in Britain to improve its security and supply chain management — as every bit as sexy as driverless vehicles or talking toasters.
“It’s really amazing the transformational capabilities of this technology,” she said.
Whether regular consumers will ever be so starry-eyed about 5G is up for debate.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) secured a record 70.2 percent share of the global foundry business in the second quarter, up from 67.6 percent the previous quarter, and continued widening its lead over second-placed Samsung Electronics Co, TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said on Monday. TSMC posted US$30.24 billion in sales in the April-to-June period, up 18.5 percent from the previous quarter, driven by major smartphone customers entering their ramp-up cycle and robust demand for artificial intelligence chips, laptops and PCs, which boosted wafer shipments and average selling prices, TrendForce said in a report. Samsung’s sales also grew in the second quarter, up
LIMITED IMPACT: Investor confidence was likely sustained by its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as only less advanced chips are made in Nanjing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) saw its stock price close steady yesterday in a sign that the loss of the validated end user (VEU) status for its Nanjing, China, fab should have a mild impact on the world’s biggest contract chipmaker financially and technologically. Media reports about the waiver loss sent TSMC down 1.29 percent during the early trading session yesterday, but the stock soon regained strength and ended at NT$1,160, unchanged from Tuesday. Investors’ confidence in TSMC was likely built on its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as Chinese customers contributed about 9 percent to TSMC’s revenue last
LOOPHOLES: The move is to end a break that was aiding foreign producers without any similar benefit for US manufacturers, the US Department of Commerce said US President Donald Trump’s administration would make it harder for Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc to ship critical equipment to their chipmaking operations in China, dealing a potential blow to the companies’ production in the world’s largest semiconductor market. The US Department of Commerce in a notice published on Friday said that it was revoking waivers for Samsung and SK Hynix to use US technologies in their Chinese operations. The companies had been operating in China under regulations that allow them to import chipmaking equipment without applying for a new license each time. The move would revise what is known
UNCERTAINTY: A final ruling against the president’s tariffs would upend his trade deals and force the government to content with billions of dollars in refunds The legal fight over US President Donald Trump’s global tariffs is deepening after a federal appeals court ruled the levies were issued illegally under an emergency law, extending the chaos in global trade. A 7-4 decision by a panel of judges on Friday was a major setback for Trump, even as it gives both sides something to boast about. The majority upheld a May ruling by the Court of International Trade that the tariffs were illegal. However, the judges left the levies intact while the case proceeds, as Trump had requested, and suggested that any injunction could potentially be narrowed to apply