That the WTO was able to come to any kind of deal at its 12th ministerial meeting last week was something of a miracle. The organization has been dead for years as a location for trade governance — and even longer as a place for successful negotiations.
Reports of the WTO’s continued existence are greatly exaggerated. Until the two most influential trading powers in the world — the US and China — commit to reform, the organization will continue to decline into irrelevance.
It is true that the deals struck last week mark two major steps forward for the WTO. While an agreement to limit subsidies for commercial fishing might have ended up much more modest in scope than originally envisaged, it injects the question of environmental sustainability into global trade policy for the first time.
Photo: Reuters
Most developing countries have long preferred to address environmental issues separately through the UN, correctly viewing them as a possible source of non-tariff barriers against emerging-economy exporters.
The second sign of progress was China’s tacit acceptance that it cannot always and perpetually claim the special benefits granted to developing economies at the WTO. The vaccine intellectual property (IP) waiver that countries agreed upon effectively excluded large exporters — in this case, China — from benefiting.
Although China accepted the restriction voluntarily, it sets an important precedent. The big question at the WTO for most developing countries is this: How can they preserve their own special rights while ensuring that China, which has already benefited more than its fair share from the WTO, does not?
Under current rules, this can only happen with Chinese acquiescence and this is the first time we have seen signs that China accepts its dominance of global goods trade means it must surrender some special protections. For the WTO to reclaim relevance — and the faith of the developing world — it would need to codify China’s new status.
However, that will not be enough. The other stumbling block to truly reviving the WTO is the US, which under US President Joe Biden has retained the previous administration’s obstructive approach to global trade.
The Biden administration’s backing of a vaccine IP waiver was hardly a concession. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the bigger obstacle to getting shots in the world’s arms was hoarding by the US and others, alongside supply chain disruptions through misuse of legislation such as the US’ Defense Production Act.
More critically, the US still has not repaired the damage it has done by vetoing nominees to the WTO’s appellate body. Until it does, the WTO would not be able to fulfill its central duty to resolve international trade disputes.
Western trade officials and analysts like to focus their ire at countries such as India, portrayed as obstructionist for wanting to maintain its oversized foodgrain stocks. Yet it is absurd to act like that is a giant worry in 2022, when the real issue is India’s unwillingness to export wheat at a time of rising prices, not the possibility that it might dump subsidized stocks on world markets.
India and other developing countries are being far more cooperative on trade than the US or China. India diluted its opposition to mixing environment and trade by allowing the fishing subsidies agreement to go through.
Its objections to the original text — which effectively made no distinctions between enormous subsidies paid to industrial fishing fleets and the tiny amount (US$15 a year per person) that India gives its largely underproductive fishing communities — were entirely reasonable.
The developed world is not going to be able to force any more cooperation from India or any other emerging economy than it saw at the latest ministerial meeting. It is time for others to take on the responsibility for reanimating the WTO.
China has benefited far more from the WTO than any other trading nation; it should step up and take responsibility for keeping the organization afloat by redefining its role.
The US, concerned that it is being exploited by other countries’ trade policies, must renew its commitment to WTO arbitration if the global trading order is to survive. It is not Indian or developing-world intransigence that is keeping the WTO close to death. It is the entitlement of China and the US.
Mihir Sharma is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. A senior fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, he is author of Restart: The Last Chance for the Indian Economy.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
DIVIDED VIEWS: Although the Fed agreed on holding rates steady, some officials see no rate cuts for this year, while 10 policymakers foresee two or more cuts There are a lot of unknowns about the outlook for the economy and interest rates, but US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell signaled at least one thing seems certain: Higher prices are coming. Fed policymakers voted unanimously to hold interest rates steady at a range of 4.25 percent to 4.50 percent for a fourth straight meeting on Wednesday, as they await clarity on whether tariffs would leave a one-time or more lasting mark on inflation. Powell said it is still unclear how much of the bill would fall on the shoulders of consumers, but he expects to learn more about tariffs
NOT JUSTIFIED: The bank’s governor said there would only be a rate cut if inflation falls below 1.5% and economic conditions deteriorate, which have not been detected The central bank yesterday kept its key interest rates unchanged for a fifth consecutive quarter, aligning with market expectations, while slightly lowering its inflation outlook amid signs of cooling price pressures. The move came after the US Federal Reserve held rates steady overnight, despite pressure from US President Donald Trump to cut borrowing costs. Central bank board members unanimously voted to maintain the discount rate at 2 percent, the secured loan rate at 2.375 percent and the overnight lending rate at 4.25 percent. “We consider the policy decision appropriate, although it suggests tightening leaning after factoring in slackening inflation and stable GDP growth,”
Greek tourism student Katerina quit within a month of starting work at a five-star hotel in Halkidiki, one of the country’s top destinations, because she said conditions were so dire. Beyond the bad pay, the 22-year-old said that her working and living conditions were “miserable and unacceptable.” Millions holiday in Greece every year, but its vital tourism industry is finding it harder and harder to recruit Greeks to look after them. “I was asked to work in any department of the hotel where there was a need, from service to cleaning,” said Katerina, a tourism and marketing student, who would
i Gasoline and diesel prices at fuel stations are this week to rise NT$0.1 per liter, as tensions in the Middle East pushed crude oil prices higher last week, CPC Corp, Taiwan (台灣中油) and Formosa Petrochemical Corp (台塑石化) said yesterday. International crude oil prices last week rose for the third consecutive week due to an escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, as the market is concerned that the situation in the Middle East might affect crude oil supply, CPC and Formosa said in separate statements. Front-month Brent crude oil futures — the international oil benchmark — rose 3.75 percent to settle at US$77.01
RSS