Visit a mid-sized store in an Indian city, and you would wonder if it exists to make any money. It might just as well be there to process transactions for half-a-dozen payment apps: PhonePe, Paytm, Google Pay, BharatPe, Amazon Pay and MobiKwik. Add up the merchants who have downloaded the digital services and the figure quickly reaches 80 million.
One-third of India’s 60 million-plus small businesses are using an average of four different platforms, said Raman Khanduja, chief executive officer of Mintoak, a Mumbai-based fintech.
“The neighborhood shopkeepers’ bandwidth is getting sucked into accepting money,” he says. “When do they run their business?”
There are several juggling acts going on, apart from the millions of owners of small businesses reconciling their accounts across the many services that have sprung up as an alternative to cash and plastic.
The payment apps do not make any money out of this activity because they all run on a shared public utility. What they get is data that they can analyze to predict the creditworthiness of the small shops.
It is the banks that ultimately issue loans to these “thin-file” customers, but fintech controls the flow of information — and gets remunerated by the lenders for finding creditworthy merchants.
Why have the banks let fintech get between them and all these potential clients?
Historically, depository institutions in emerging markets such as India did not see much business in democratizing cashless payments. Card readers were costly pieces of hardware and could only be deployed at shops that were well-established. These point-of-sale devices were also dumb: Even when the lenders got data about a store that was swiping a lot of cards issued by them, to advance money to a retailer based on that knowledge required multiple sales calls. It was not worth the trouble then, and makes even less sense now that India’s digital revolution has put plastic in the shade.
Credit and debit cards get swiped in two out of 10 transactions — usually for higher-value purchases and at bigger retailers.
Banks also fell behind in embracing payments on smartphones.
They do not have a tech DNA and the weight of their legacy infrastructure made their own online products clunky.
Fintech, which was far nimbler and more willing to shower generous cash-backs at early adopters, jumped on the opportunity created by India’s six-year-old Unified Payments Interface. Using this highly popular, open-source protocol, mobile apps in India move funds in real time — using phone numbers for person-to-person transfers and QR codes to settle shopping bills.
Nearly 2 billion such merchant transactions got done in February. The Indian government mandates that all Unified Payments Interface transactions be free of charge.
You would think that the apps, looking for ways to make money from payments, would attack the banks’ deposit-taking franchise, then. They are, actually. BharatPe part-owns a bank and is thus in a position to lure retailers to switch their current accounts. Similarly, Alphabet Inc’s Google Pay, the second most popular consumer wallet in India after Walmart Inc-owned PhonePe, is using its sway to promote fixed deposits.
WHAT’S THE POINT?
If lenders lose control of demand and time deposits, what is even the point of having a banking license?
Lending in a digital world is proving to be equally problematic. Banks are not intuitively geared to handle the unique requirements of small businesses. Suppose the salesperson for Unilever PLC’s local unit shows up at a store and says: “Since I have to meet my quarterly target, you can have another 5 percent discount if you pay upfront.”
Traditional lenders’ internal processes are too slow to clear an immediate loan like that. What is needed are pre-approved credit limits based on the borrower’s digital cash flows and innovative products such as buy-now, pay-later — but for retailers.
This is what banks have been missing out on.
Now they want to reclaim the lost ground, but can they?
They would have to come in as consolidators, leveraging the trust advantage they still have over fintech, which is hobbled by its own ubiquity. Because there are already so many apps on an average shopkeeper’s phone, each service obtains only a fragment of actual sales.
“Nobody is getting enough data to offer meaningful financial services,” Khanduja says.
That is why the former Visa Inc executive, together with a couple of his colleagues, came up with the idea of Mintoak, a white-label merchant-payment platform for banks that can accept all digital payments, as well as cash and cards.
It produces a single report, leaving retailers free to run their business.
Mintoak, which works with HDFC Bank Ltd and State Bank of India, two of India’s largest lenders, earns a subscription fee and gets a cut on products that banks sell on the platform.
HDFC Bank owns 5.2 percent of the start-up.
India’s success in digital finance has inspired many emerging markets to design payments along similar lines, giving Mintoak a foothold in the Middle East and the prospect of its first client in Africa.
“We want to reconnect banks with SMEs [small and medium-sized enterprises],” Khanduja says.
Payments are not the only way to tap small businesses. A vast chunk of the working capital that retailers need is embedded in the inventory. This credit used to reach them informally via distributors of brands, but it is increasingly being provided by e-commerce platforms such as venture capital-backed Udaan and billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s JioMart app for neighborhood stores.
UK-based Standard Chartered PLC has made an attempt to get into India’s business-to-business e-commerce with the hope of replicating the model in Kenya and other emerging markets.
However, most other banks would rather stick to what they know.
Luckily for them, none of the existing merchant-payment apps still has the revenue heft of a Block Inc — formerly Square Inc — in the US.
Before a dominant player emerges in the fragmented market, India’s banks need to find their way back to the cash counter.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services.
SHARES DOWN: The top 10 companies all decreased in market value last year, due to COVID-19, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, rising interest rates and global inflation Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) retained the top spot among the largest companies in the Asian supply chain in terms of market capitalization, Digitimes Research said. Citing its Asia Supply Chain Market Cap 100 rankings for last year, the research firm last week said TSMC’s market cap was US$378.45 billion, the highest among Asian suppliers, although it dropped by nearly US$200 billion during the year. The 34.3 percent fall in TSMC’s market cap was the largest decline of any company in the survey last year, but was typical of how many top-ranking companies fared. The top 10 in Digitimes’ rankings all saw
Sex worker Nina relies on an apartment in the Turkish city of Istanbul as a relatively safe space to meet clients, but the 29-year-old is worried about making enough to cover the rent after the landlord doubled the price. As a surge in inflation fuels a housing crisis in Turkey, LGBTQ+ sex workers like Nina say landlords are forcing them to accept huge rent hikes for fear of being evicted. Nina, who uses the pronouns they and them, worries about how they will pay the increased monthly rent of 8,000 Turkish lira (US$425.11) on top of rising bills. “There are gas, electricity, water,
Singapore is seeing an influx of ultra-wealthy families from China looking to protect their wealth from a government that increasingly views them with suspicion. The Chinese Communist Party’s recent crackdowns on tech billionaires and tax-shy celebrities, as well as three years of “zero COVID” policies, have led many rich Chinese to look for a safe haven. Nervous over the fate of their fortunes, some of the country’s mega-rich have since booked tickets to Singapore, insiders said. The key Asian financial hub ticks all the boxes for relocating tycoons. Singapore has been ruled by one party for the past six decades, and labor strikes and
Samsung Electronics Co has begun making its fold and flip smartphones as well as its latest Galaxy S23 flagship in India, renewing its focus on a key growth market where Chinese devices have eaten into its sales. The South Korean giant’s Indian unit previously imported some of its premium flip and fold devices into the world’s second-biggest smartphone market, but it is now assembling its entire phone portfolio locally, said Raju Pullan, the head of Samsung’s Indian mobile business. “That also builds on our strong commitment to growing the India market,” Pullan said yesterday, declining to comment on whether the locally assembled