There is nothing older generations enjoy more than complaining about the young. Their childhoods are too coddled and full of non-dangerous toys, then they get to school where they are not beaten with sticks and therefore do not build character, then they go to university where they bully statues and either have too much or not enough sex.
Now, as millennials have aged into their uncool middle-manager era, and Gen Z enter the workforce, they have inspired a number of books and articles and speeches about how young people these days do not know the value of a hard day’s work.
As many columnists, business book authors and upper managers would often have it, the younger set are simply terrible workers. They ask for too much, they do too little, they do not respect hierarchies, they do not want to pay their dues, they say “like” too much, they have tattoos on their arms, they are always looking at their phones and they quit their jobs instead of miserably sticking it out.
Photo: AP
A friend was once called a “snowflake” by her own uncle when she decided to quit a job just a few weeks in, because the boss was horrible and abusive. He was also drunk at work much of the time.
Why would leaving such a job draw such an insult, suggesting she should have toughed it out in a terrible situation? She was, to his mind, entitled and too sensitive.
However, it is not actually true that young people work less hard than their elders. Even if it were, why should we not aspire to a future with less work?
Last year, a New York Times headline declared that “The 37-year-olds are afraid of the 23-year-olds who work for them.”
It gestured to a division between anxious, conscientious millennials, many of whom had entered the workplace in the shadow of the 2008 crash, and their Gen Z counterparts, who feel comfortable “delegating to their boss.”
The Harvard Business Review has similarly written about the “work martydom” of millennials, citing US studies that find young people feel more shame about taking time off for holidays and are more likely to forfeit unused vacation days.
The author Malcolm Harris described millennials not as overly rebellious, but rather as “servile, anxious [and] afraid.”
In a precarious economy marked by historic inequality, the importance of getting and maintaining a good job is more acute than ever. Those who entered the workforce after the double whammy of the recession and the invention of the iPhone have never really been able to not be at work.
Nevertheless, young people are critiqued for their attempts to set boundaries at work. One young woman in the New York Times piece about Gen Z workers shocked her bosses by asking if she could leave work after finishing her tasks for the day, rather than sticking around in the name of the traditional 9am to 5pm workday.
Maybe she was on to something.
For the millions who have quit their jobs in the “great resignation,” the COVID-19 pandemic and a tight labor market have made once radical propositions — such as not sticking out a miserable job — feel more possible. Why put up with abuse, discrimination and poor pay when you could just go get another job?
While the pandemic has opened up such possibilities, it also laid bare the extreme divides between those workers who could work from home and those who had to show up and risk their lives. It showed how many businesses were willing to put their employees at risk in the name of profits, and how many privileged people were unwilling to sacrifice their creature comforts for another person’s safety.
However, at both ends of this divided economy of work, there is a newly invigorated labor movement — even in the generally union-unfriendly US — and young people are playing a central role.
A 2018 Pew Research survey found that US adults under 30 are the only group in which a larger share hold a favorable view of labor unions than feel the same way about corporations.
The United Auto Workers union wrote in 2019 about the momentum of unionization in unexpected places: at nonprofits, coffee shops and digital media outfits.
Meanwhile, workers at places such as Amazon.com Inc fulfillment centers are also seeking to form unions for the first time.
Yet wherever you find them, workers who demand better conditions meet with similar-sounding scrutiny.
They are told that they are asking for too much, and that they should be grateful, that a company is like a family and they are better off without a union, which would just get in between the company and the employees.
This is what I was told in my previous digital media job when we attempted, and failed, to gain union recognition.
This is also exactly what Amazon warehouse workers were told when they attempted to form a union in Alabama.
In my own experience, I saw the ways in which problems at work could be pinned on employees’ lack of character, fortitude and work ethic, rather than structural faults of the company.
We brought up concerns about pay gaps along gender and racial lines, lack of transparency in raises and promotions and lack of support for mental health.
In response, we were given subscriptions to an app to sort out our mental health, but were expected to do it on our own time.
If management can successfully dismiss employees’ demands as those of spoiled, narcissistic young people — of snowflakes — then they can save themselves the trouble and the cost of creating a fair workplace.
The problem of modern work is not that young people lack character, their only crime is a disinclination to make themselves miserable in the name of making the rich richer.
Is that so unreasonable?
CAUTIOUS RECOVERY: While the manufacturing sector returned to growth amid the US-China trade truce, firms remain wary as uncertainty clouds the outlook, the CIER said The local manufacturing sector returned to expansion last month, as the official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) rose 2.1 points to 51.0, driven by a temporary easing in US-China trade tensions, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The PMI gauges the health of the manufacturing industry, with readings above 50 indicating expansion and those below 50 signaling contraction. “Firms are not as pessimistic as they were in April, but they remain far from optimistic,” CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said at a news conference. The full impact of US tariff decisions is unlikely to become clear until later this month
With an approval rating of just two percent, Peruvian President Dina Boluarte might be the world’s most unpopular leader, according to pollsters. Protests greeted her rise to power 29 months ago, and have marked her entire term — joined by assorted scandals, investigations, controversies and a surge in gang violence. The 63-year-old is the target of a dozen probes, including for her alleged failure to declare gifts of luxury jewels and watches, a scandal inevitably dubbed “Rolexgate.” She is also under the microscope for a two-week undeclared absence for nose surgery — which she insists was medical, not cosmetic — and is
GROWING CONCERN: Some senior Trump administration officials opposed the UAE expansion over fears that another TSMC project could jeopardize its US investment Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is evaluating building an advanced production facility in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and has discussed the possibility with officials in US President Donald Trump’s administration, people familiar with the matter said, in a potentially major bet on the Middle East that would only come to fruition with Washington’s approval. The company has had multiple meetings in the past few months with US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and officials from MGX, an influential investment vehicle overseen by the UAE president’s brother, the people said. The conversations are a continuation of talks that
CHIP DUTIES: TSMC said it voiced its concerns to Washington about tariffs, telling the US commerce department that it wants ‘fair treatment’ to protect its competitiveness Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday reiterated robust business prospects for this year as strong artificial intelligence (AI) chip demand from Nvidia Corp and other customers would absorb the impacts of US tariffs. “The impact of tariffs would be indirect, as the custom tax is the importers’ responsibility, not the exporters,” TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said at the chipmaker’s annual shareholders’ meeting in Hsinchu City. TSMC’s business could be affected if people become reluctant to buy electronics due to inflated prices, Wei said. In addition, the chipmaker has voiced its concern to the US Department of Commerce