Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (阿里巴巴) has warned investors that years-long government tax breaks for the Internet industry would start to dwindle, adding billions of US dollars in costs for China’s largest corporations as Beijing extends its campaign to rein in the sector.
China’s No.1 e-commerce company told some investors during post-earnings calls this week that the government stopped treating some of its businesses as so-called Key Software Enterprises (KSE) — a designation that conferred a preferential 10 percent tax rate, people familiar with the matter said.
The Tmall (天貓) operator forecasts an effective tax rate of 20 percent for the September quarter, up from just 8 percent a year ago, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private conversations.
Photo: Bloomberg
However, Alibaba said that most Internet companies would likely no longer enjoy the 10 percent rate, they added.
The move reflects Beijing’s tightening regulatory approach toward its largest tech companies from Alibaba to Tencent Holdings Ltd (騰訊) and Meituan (美團), which have come under fire for using their troves of data to enrich investors at the expenses of users.
On Thursday, the state-backed newspaper Securities Times said in an op-ed that China should scrap tax breaks to gaming companies, because now they are big enough to thrive on their own.
“Because the preferential tax rates related to KSE are subject to annual review by the relevant tax authorities in China, there is always risk that companies that apply would not be granted the tax benefit,” Citigroup analyst Alicia Yap wrote in a research note yesterday. “The argument basis sounds reasonable given a tightening regulatory environment and recent anti-trust investigation and fines on the Internet sector.”
China’s effort to free up more tax revenue reflects a global trend. A tax deal struck between the world’s richest countries this year brought global governments a step closer toward clawing back some power from technology giants that have used century-old regimes to build up wealth eclipsing the economies of most nations.
The Chinese government has over the years handed out a wide range of tax incentives and financial aids to its now giant Internet sector. While the standard corporate income tax rate is 25 percent, those who qualify as high-tech enterprises enjoy a 15 percent rate and an even-more generous 10 percent rate is awarded to those deemed to operate essential software.
The removal of such incentives demonstrates Beijing’s willingness to go after private enterprises to address social inequities and rein in powerful interests. Its campaign against big tech is now entering its 10th month, a roller-coaster ordeal that is prompting nervous investors to ponder the longer-term ramification of a crackdown that quickly spread from Jack Ma’s twin giants of Ant Group Co (螞蟻集團) and Alibaba to others like Tencent and gig-economy leaders Meituan and Didi Global Inc (滴滴).
The loss of the preferential tax status at its core marketplaces like Taobao (淘寶) and Tmall could mean Alibaba would miss out on a tax benefit of about 11 billion yuan (US$1.7 billion) for this fiscal year, Bocom International Holdings Co analyst Connie Gu estimated.
For the September quarter last year, Alibaba recognized tax credits of about 6.1 billion yuan after tax authorities renewed the KSE status for some subsidiaries, it said in its earnings statement at the time.
That tax benefit meant Alibaba paid an 18 percent effective tax rate for fiscal 2021, during which it swallowed a record US$2.8 billion antitrust penalty.
The company told investors its effective tax rate for fiscal 2022 could rise to 23 percent to 25 percent, the people said, adding that some businesses will continue to enjoy the 15 percent rate for high-tech enterprises.
Poland is betting on a flood of investments and technology transfers from Taiwanese companies to reengineer its US$1 trillion economy. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said yesterday that Poland will no longer be “just an assembly hub” as it pursues further investments from the likes of Foxconn Technology Group (富士康). The firm, whose full name is Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), last month agreed to build electric vehicles (EVs) in the European Union nation and now could be a partner in a semiconductor venture, he said. The government’s aim is to boost manufacturing and the country’s high-tech chops in an era
Taiwan remained the sixth-largest net creditor nation in the world last year, despite a fall of more than 10 percent in its net international investment position (NIIP) over the year, the central bank said yesterday. The NIIP is the difference between a country’s external financial assets and its external financial liabilities. Taiwan’s external financial assets hit US$3.27 trillion at the end of last year, up US$275.75 billion or 9.2 percent from a year earlier, the central bank said in its annual NIIP report. The growth largely reflected an increase in holdings of overseas marketable securities by residents in Taiwan, as well as a
RESTRICTION BREACH: ASML said that it denies ‘unfounded rumors regarding non-compliance with export controls concerning China,’ and enforces controls strictly US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in a series of recent meetings outlined concerns to Dutch chip-equipment giant ASML Holding NV’s senior leaders that one of its top-of-the-line machines might have made its way into China, in violation of US-led export restrictions. In the meetings, Lutnick expressed concern to ASML executives over the company’s extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines, people familiar with the talks said. EUV systems are used by firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) to manufacture processors for the likes of Nvidia Corp and Apple Inc. ASML has never been allowed to ship them to China because of curbs
BAD FAITH LITIGATION? The two companies, owned by a California-based private equity firm, could be seeking licensing fees or a settlement payout with the suit Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) Director-General Liao Cheng-wei (廖承威) said yesterday he suspected that two firms suing contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) for patent infringement are “patent trolls.” A patent troll refers to a company that buys patents not for manufacturing products, but to sue other companies for compensation, accusing them of using its patents. Patent trolls, formally called Non-Practicing Entities or Patent Assertion Entities, were responsible for more than 50 percent of lawsuits in the US last year, costing targeted businesses tens of billions of US dollars a year, according to the US-based LegalCharity Web site. Asked whether
RSS