Sun, Nov 29, 2020 page16

• China’s ‘shadow trade war’ threatens Australia

  The consequences of Chinese curbs on Australian products are more political than economical, as Beijing makes an example of Canberra for speaking up

  • By Andrew Beatty / AFP, SYDNEY
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Biting new Chinese trade tariffs have stoked fears that Australia’s virus-weakened economy is being targeted for political retribution and the two countries might be sliding into a “shadow trade war.”

  Since Canberra pointedly demanded an investigation into the origins and spread of COVID-19, the number of Australian businesses being squeezed in China has exploded.

  Crates of Australian rock lobsters have been left to rot at a Chinese airport and mountains of coal have been stuck in Chinese ports.

  

  A bottle of Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is displayed at the Royal Star Wine showroom in Sydney on Tuesday last week. WARNING: Excessive consumption of alcohol can damage your health.

  Photo: Bloomberg

  On Friday, Beijing turned the screw again, hitting Australian wine exports with punitive tariffs of up to 212 percent, essentially closing off a US$1 billion market.

  In total, 13 sectors have been targeted, according to a running tally from Jeffrey Wilson, a trade expert with the Perth USAsia Centre think tank.

  The list so far includes barley, beef, coal, copper, cotton, lobsters, sugar, timber, tourism, universities, wine, wheat and wool.

  Wilson estimated the total value of Australian goods at risk at about US$40 billion.

  It is an eye-watering number that represents 12 percent of all Australia’s exports, in a country experiencing its first recession in 30 years.

  Beyond the fear, fury and headline-grabbing restrictions, trade experts said the overall economic effect for Australia has so far been more modest.

  “The number of industries that have been sanctioned is large, but the direct economic impact to the economy as a whole in Australia is going to be significantly smaller,” Wilson said.

  He said that the actual economic impact might be US$2 billion to US$4 billion and perhaps less if affected firms look for other export markets.

  Curbs on Australian beef have affected only four meat processing plants, three of which are not Australian-owned.

  China’s suggestion that its tourists and students boycott Australia poses only a limited threat while there is a virtual ban on travel to during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  “The action on coal is something that comes up this time every year, because China has this soft quota on coal imports,” said Stephen Kirchner, a trade and investment expert at Sydney University’s United States Studies Centre. “It’s a calendar-year quota, so you start to bump up against the quota round about this time.”

  In the two hardest-hit sectors — barley and wine — where an Australian export market could be wiped out entirely, the “retaliation” might have happened even if Canberra and Beijing were best of friends.

  Scott Waldron of the University of Queensland has studied Chinese agricultural tariffs extensively and believes the sanctions are as much about China’s security goals, shaping its own economy and protecting local jobs.

  Beijing has mulled restricting Australian barley imports since 2018 at the latest, amid worries that China — which produces only about 20 percent of the barley it needs — is overly dependent on imports.

  “The wine case is very similar,” Waldron said. “China’s had a really active industry policy for wine for more than a decade” and an industry body that is increasingly keen to ringfence its home market from imports.

  Waldron pointed to the precedent in Beijing’s use of domestic subsidies and import quotas to reduce dependence on US corn, from a vulnerable 90 percent imported to about 9 percent today.

  “There are domestic trade and industry policy reasons why they are doing these things,” he said.

  While that might hurt individual Australian companies, the higher cost for Australia might be political — being made an example of by its largest trade partner.

  “This is really about sending a message to other countries,” Wilson said. “‘Keep your mouth shut or we’ll do to you what we’re doing to Australia.’”

  Officially, China said the disputes are technical and unrelated.

  However, through leaks and state media commentary, Beijing has hinted the trade problems are a result of what the state-run Global Times called the “deteriorating China-Australia relationship”.

  “They will never draw that nexus explicitly,” Kirchner said. “But they do enough to draw it implicitly.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Hsieh and Hung win badminton doubles title at BWF Super 300 Macau Open

  • 2

    Three former employees of TSMC detained

  • 3

    Crew safe after Peru incident: Evergreen

  • 4

    Teenager Victoria Mboko upsets Coco Gauff

  • 5

    Mascot of Taiwan program in Osaka proves popular