Biting new Chinese trade tariffs have stoked fears that Australia’s virus-weakened economy is being targeted for political retribution and the two countries might be sliding into a “shadow trade war.”
Since Canberra pointedly demanded an investigation into the origins and spread of COVID-19, the number of Australian businesses being squeezed in China has exploded.
Crates of Australian rock lobsters have been left to rot at a Chinese airport and mountains of coal have been stuck in Chinese ports.
Photo: Bloomberg
On Friday, Beijing turned the screw again, hitting Australian wine exports with punitive tariffs of up to 212 percent, essentially closing off a US$1 billion market.
In total, 13 sectors have been targeted, according to a running tally from Jeffrey Wilson, a trade expert with the Perth USAsia Centre think tank.
The list so far includes barley, beef, coal, copper, cotton, lobsters, sugar, timber, tourism, universities, wine, wheat and wool.
Wilson estimated the total value of Australian goods at risk at about US$40 billion.
It is an eye-watering number that represents 12 percent of all Australia’s exports, in a country experiencing its first recession in 30 years.
Beyond the fear, fury and headline-grabbing restrictions, trade experts said the overall economic effect for Australia has so far been more modest.
“The number of industries that have been sanctioned is large, but the direct economic impact to the economy as a whole in Australia is going to be significantly smaller,” Wilson said.
He said that the actual economic impact might be US$2 billion to US$4 billion and perhaps less if affected firms look for other export markets.
Curbs on Australian beef have affected only four meat processing plants, three of which are not Australian-owned.
China’s suggestion that its tourists and students boycott Australia poses only a limited threat while there is a virtual ban on travel to during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The action on coal is something that comes up this time every year, because China has this soft quota on coal imports,” said Stephen Kirchner, a trade and investment expert at Sydney University’s United States Studies Centre. “It’s a calendar-year quota, so you start to bump up against the quota round about this time.”
In the two hardest-hit sectors — barley and wine — where an Australian export market could be wiped out entirely, the “retaliation” might have happened even if Canberra and Beijing were best of friends.
Scott Waldron of the University of Queensland has studied Chinese agricultural tariffs extensively and believes the sanctions are as much about China’s security goals, shaping its own economy and protecting local jobs.
Beijing has mulled restricting Australian barley imports since 2018 at the latest, amid worries that China — which produces only about 20 percent of the barley it needs — is overly dependent on imports.
“The wine case is very similar,” Waldron said. “China’s had a really active industry policy for wine for more than a decade” and an industry body that is increasingly keen to ringfence its home market from imports.
Waldron pointed to the precedent in Beijing’s use of domestic subsidies and import quotas to reduce dependence on US corn, from a vulnerable 90 percent imported to about 9 percent today.
“There are domestic trade and industry policy reasons why they are doing these things,” he said.
While that might hurt individual Australian companies, the higher cost for Australia might be political — being made an example of by its largest trade partner.
“This is really about sending a message to other countries,” Wilson said. “‘Keep your mouth shut or we’ll do to you what we’re doing to Australia.’”
Officially, China said the disputes are technical and unrelated.
However, through leaks and state media commentary, Beijing has hinted the trade problems are a result of what the state-run Global Times called the “deteriorating China-Australia relationship”.
“They will never draw that nexus explicitly,” Kirchner said. “But they do enough to draw it implicitly.”
Among the rows of vibrators, rubber torsos and leather harnesses at a Chinese sex toys exhibition in Shanghai this weekend, the beginnings of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven shift in the industry quietly pulsed. China manufactures about 70 percent of the world’s sex toys, most of it the “hardware” on display at the fair — whether that be technicolor tentacled dildos or hyper-realistic personalized silicone dolls. Yet smart toys have been rising in popularity for some time. Many major European and US brands already offer tech-enhanced products that can enable long-distance love, monitor well-being and even bring people one step closer to
Malaysia’s leader yesterday announced plans to build a massive semiconductor design park, aiming to boost the Southeast Asian nation’s role in the global chip industry. A prominent player in the semiconductor industry for decades, Malaysia accounts for an estimated 13 percent of global back-end manufacturing, according to German tech giant Bosch. Now it wants to go beyond production and emerge as a chip design powerhouse too, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said. “I am pleased to announce the largest IC (integrated circuit) Design Park in Southeast Asia, that will house world-class anchor tenants and collaborate with global companies such as Arm [Holdings PLC],”
Sales in the retail, and food and beverage sectors last month continued to rise, increasing 0.7 percent and 13.6 percent respectively from a year earlier, setting record highs for the month of March, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said yesterday. Sales in the wholesale sector also grew last month by 4.6 annually, mainly due to the business opportunities for emerging applications related to artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing technologies, the ministry said in a report. The ministry forecast that retail, and food and beverage sales this month would retain their growth momentum as the former would benefit from Tomb Sweeping Day
Thousands of parents in Singapore are furious after a Cordlife Group Ltd (康盛人生集團), a major operator of cord blood banks in Asia, irreparably damaged their children’s samples through improper handling, with some now pursuing legal action. The ongoing case, one of the worst to hit the largely untested industry, has renewed concerns over companies marketing themselves to anxious parents with mostly unproven assurances. This has implications across the region, given Cordlife’s operations in Hong Kong, Macau, Indonesia, the Philippines and India. The parents paid for years to have their infants’ cord blood stored, with the understanding that the stem cells they contained