On a busy day, contract employees in India monitoring nudity and pornography on Facebook and Instagram will each view 2,000 posts in an eight-hour shift, or almost four per minute.
They are part of a 1,600-member team at Genpact Ltd, an outsourcing firm with offices in the southern Indian city of Hyderabad that is contracted to review Facebook content.
Seven content reviewers at Genpact said in interviews late last year and early this year that their work was underpaid, stressful and sometimes traumatic.
The reviewers, all in their 20s, declined to be identified for fear of losing their jobs or breaching nondisclosure agreements. Three of the seven have left Genpact in the past few months.
“I have seen women employees breaking down on the floor, reliving the trauma of watching suicides real-time,” one former employee said, adding that he had seen this happen at least three times.
Reuters was unable to independently verify the incidents or determine how often they might have occurred.
Genpact declined comment.
The working conditions described by the employees offer a window into the moderator operations at Facebook Inc and the challenges faced by the company as it seeks to police what its 2 billion users post.
Their accounts contrast in several respects with the image presented by three Facebook executives in interviews and statements of a carefully selected, skilled workforce that is paid well and has the tools to handle a difficult job.
Facebook vice president of operations Ellen Silver acknowledged that content moderation “at this size is uncharted territory.”
“We care deeply about getting this right,” she said in January. “This includes the training reviewers receive, our hiring practices, the wellness resources that we provide to each and every person reviewing content, and our overall engagement with partners.”
While rejecting the Hyderabad employees’ assertions about low pay, Facebook has said that it had begun drafting a code of conduct for outsourcing partners, but declined to give details.
It has also said that it would be introducing an annual compliance audit of its vendor policies this year to review the work at contractor facilities.
The company is organizing a first-ever summit next month to bring together its outsourcing vendors from around the world, with the aim of sharing best practices and bringing more consistency to how moderators are treated.
These efforts were announced in a blogpost on Monday by Facebook vice president of global operations Justin Osofsky.
Facebook works with at least five outsourcing vendors in at least eight countries on content review, a Reuters tally showed.
About 15,000 people, a mix of contractors and employees at more than 20 content review sites worldwide, were working on content review at Facebook as of December last year, Silver said.
More than a dozen moderators in other parts of the world have talked of similar traumatic experiences.
A former Facebook contract employee, Selena Scola, filed a lawsuit in California in September last year, alleging that content moderators who face mental trauma after reviewing distressing images on the platform are not being properly protected by the social networking company.
Facebook in a court filing has denied all of Scola’s allegations and called for a dismissal, contending that Scola has insufficient grounds to sue.
Some examples of traumatic experiences among Facebook content moderators in the US were described this week by technology news Web site The Verge.
The Genpact unit in Hyderabad reviews posts in Indian languages, Arabic, English and some Afghan and Asian tribal dialects, Facebook said.
On one team, employees spend their days reviewing nudity and explicit pornography.
Meanwhile, the “counterterrorism” team watches videos that include beheadings, car bombings and electric shock torture sessions, the employees said.
Those on the “self-harm” unit regularly watch live videos of suicide attempts — and do not always succeed in alerting authorities in time, two of the employees said, adding that they had no experience with suicide or trauma.
Facebook said that its policies called for moderators to alert a “specially trained team” to review situations where there was “potential imminent risk or harm.”
The moderators who spoke to reporters said that in the instances they knew of, the trained team was called in when there was a possibility of a suicide, but the reviewers continued to monitor the feed even after the team had been alerted.
Job postings and salary pay slips seen by reporters showed that annual compensation at Genpact for an entry-level Facebook Arabic-language content reviewer was 100,000 Indian rupees (US$1,409) annually, or just more than US$6 per day.
Facebook contended that benefits made the real pay much higher.
The workers said that they did receive transportation to and from work, a common noncash benefit in India.
Moderators in Hyderabad employed by another information technology outsourcing firm, Accenture PLC, monitor Arabic content on YouTube on behalf of Google for a minimum of 350,000 rupees annually, according to two of its workers and pay slips seen by reporters.
Accenture declined to comment, citing client confidentiality.
Facebook disputed the pay analysis, saying that Genpact is required to pay more than industry averages.
The outsourcer, while declining to comment on its work for Facebook, said in a statement that its wages are “significantly higher than the standard in the industry or the minimum wage set by law.”
The Genpact moderators in Hyderabad said that Facebook sets performance targets, which are reassessed periodically, that are called “average review time” or “average handling time.”
“We have to meet an accuracy rate of 98 percent on massive targets,” one of the moderators told reporters. “It is just not easy when you are consistently bombarded with stuff that is mostly mind-numbing.”
More than 20,000 employees at Apple Inc supplier Foxconn Technology Group’s (富士康) huge Chinese plant, mostly new hires not yet working on production lines, have left, a Foxconn source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The departures from the world’s largest iPhone factory dealt a fresh blow to the Taiwanese company, which has been grappling with strict COVID-19 restrictions that have fueled worker discontent and disrupted production ahead of Christmas and January’s Lunar New Year holiday. Concerns are mounting over Apple’s ability to deliver products for the busy holiday period as the worker unrest lingers at the Zhengzhou plant, which produces the
’INHERENT VULNERABILITIES’: The country has been working with the US to build its own lithium and rare earth mines in a bid to curb China’s dominance in the market Australia is vowing more assertive scrutiny of foreign investments in key commodities tied to electric vehicles and clean energy, in a potential warning to China which dominates the market. Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers has asked the country’s Treasury to work with the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board and other stakeholders to undertake a review of foreign investment in sectors such as lithium and rare earths, he told a conference in Sydney yesterday. “We’ll need to be more assertive about encouraging investment that clearly aligns with our national interest in the longer term,” Chalmers said. Although Chalmers did not directly identify China investment as
FACTORY TUMULT: The departure of new workers impact production less than the quarantines imposed on existing employees, a worker at China’s ‘iPhone city’ said Turmoil at Apple Inc’s key manufacturing hub in Zhengzhou is likely to result in a production shortfall of almost 6 million iPhone Pro units this year, a person familiar with assembly operations said. The situation remains fluid at the plant and the estimate of lost production could change, the person said, asking not to be named discussing private information. Much depends on how quickly Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), the Taiwanese company that operates the facility, can get people back to assembly lines after violent protests against COVID-19 restrictions. If lockdowns continue in the weeks ahead, production could be set further
HOLIDAY SEASON OMEN: Low-cost brands and high-end retailers had the most foot traffic, leaving mid-range stores struggling on what used to be their biggest sales day US retailers discounted heavily on Black Friday to clear out bloated inventories, but customers responded with only modest traffic, leaving profitability in doubt for many chains. Brick-and-mortar retailers, which were hit hard by COVID-19 closures and shoppers seeking to avoid the virus, saw in-store traffic on Friday tick up 2.9 percent from last year’s shopping event, data compiled by Sensormatic Solutions showed. US consumers are still spending, but they are growing more cautious after contending this year with the highest inflation rates in four decades. They are also keeping a sharper lookout for deals, and retailers — many of them still heavy