On a busy day, contract employees in India monitoring nudity and pornography on Facebook and Instagram will each view 2,000 posts in an eight-hour shift, or almost four per minute.
They are part of a 1,600-member team at Genpact Ltd, an outsourcing firm with offices in the southern Indian city of Hyderabad that is contracted to review Facebook content.
Seven content reviewers at Genpact said in interviews late last year and early this year that their work was underpaid, stressful and sometimes traumatic.
The reviewers, all in their 20s, declined to be identified for fear of losing their jobs or breaching nondisclosure agreements. Three of the seven have left Genpact in the past few months.
“I have seen women employees breaking down on the floor, reliving the trauma of watching suicides real-time,” one former employee said, adding that he had seen this happen at least three times.
Reuters was unable to independently verify the incidents or determine how often they might have occurred.
Genpact declined comment.
The working conditions described by the employees offer a window into the moderator operations at Facebook Inc and the challenges faced by the company as it seeks to police what its 2 billion users post.
Their accounts contrast in several respects with the image presented by three Facebook executives in interviews and statements of a carefully selected, skilled workforce that is paid well and has the tools to handle a difficult job.
Facebook vice president of operations Ellen Silver acknowledged that content moderation “at this size is uncharted territory.”
“We care deeply about getting this right,” she said in January. “This includes the training reviewers receive, our hiring practices, the wellness resources that we provide to each and every person reviewing content, and our overall engagement with partners.”
While rejecting the Hyderabad employees’ assertions about low pay, Facebook has said that it had begun drafting a code of conduct for outsourcing partners, but declined to give details.
It has also said that it would be introducing an annual compliance audit of its vendor policies this year to review the work at contractor facilities.
The company is organizing a first-ever summit next month to bring together its outsourcing vendors from around the world, with the aim of sharing best practices and bringing more consistency to how moderators are treated.
These efforts were announced in a blogpost on Monday by Facebook vice president of global operations Justin Osofsky.
Facebook works with at least five outsourcing vendors in at least eight countries on content review, a Reuters tally showed.
About 15,000 people, a mix of contractors and employees at more than 20 content review sites worldwide, were working on content review at Facebook as of December last year, Silver said.
More than a dozen moderators in other parts of the world have talked of similar traumatic experiences.
A former Facebook contract employee, Selena Scola, filed a lawsuit in California in September last year, alleging that content moderators who face mental trauma after reviewing distressing images on the platform are not being properly protected by the social networking company.
Facebook in a court filing has denied all of Scola’s allegations and called for a dismissal, contending that Scola has insufficient grounds to sue.
Some examples of traumatic experiences among Facebook content moderators in the US were described this week by technology news Web site The Verge.
The Genpact unit in Hyderabad reviews posts in Indian languages, Arabic, English and some Afghan and Asian tribal dialects, Facebook said.
On one team, employees spend their days reviewing nudity and explicit pornography.
Meanwhile, the “counterterrorism” team watches videos that include beheadings, car bombings and electric shock torture sessions, the employees said.
Those on the “self-harm” unit regularly watch live videos of suicide attempts — and do not always succeed in alerting authorities in time, two of the employees said, adding that they had no experience with suicide or trauma.
Facebook said that its policies called for moderators to alert a “specially trained team” to review situations where there was “potential imminent risk or harm.”
The moderators who spoke to reporters said that in the instances they knew of, the trained team was called in when there was a possibility of a suicide, but the reviewers continued to monitor the feed even after the team had been alerted.
Job postings and salary pay slips seen by reporters showed that annual compensation at Genpact for an entry-level Facebook Arabic-language content reviewer was 100,000 Indian rupees (US$1,409) annually, or just more than US$6 per day.
Facebook contended that benefits made the real pay much higher.
The workers said that they did receive transportation to and from work, a common noncash benefit in India.
Moderators in Hyderabad employed by another information technology outsourcing firm, Accenture PLC, monitor Arabic content on YouTube on behalf of Google for a minimum of 350,000 rupees annually, according to two of its workers and pay slips seen by reporters.
Accenture declined to comment, citing client confidentiality.
Facebook disputed the pay analysis, saying that Genpact is required to pay more than industry averages.
The outsourcer, while declining to comment on its work for Facebook, said in a statement that its wages are “significantly higher than the standard in the industry or the minimum wage set by law.”
The Genpact moderators in Hyderabad said that Facebook sets performance targets, which are reassessed periodically, that are called “average review time” or “average handling time.”
“We have to meet an accuracy rate of 98 percent on massive targets,” one of the moderators told reporters. “It is just not easy when you are consistently bombarded with stuff that is mostly mind-numbing.”
PATENTS: MediaTek Inc said it would not comment on ongoing legal cases, but does not expect the legal action by Huawei to affect its business operations Smartphone integrated chips designer MediaTek Inc (聯發科) on Friday said that a lawsuit filed by Chinese smartphone brand Huawei Technologies Co (華為) over alleged patent infringements would have little impact on its operations. In an announcement posted on the Taiwan Stock Exchange, MediaTek said that it would not comment on an ongoing legal case. However, the company said that Huawei’s legal action would have little impact on its operations. MediaTek’s statement came after China-based PRIP Research said on Thursday that Huawei filed a lawsuit with a Chinese district court claiming that MediaTek infringed on its patents. The infringement mentioned in the lawsuit likely involved
Taipei is today suspending work, classes and its US$2.4 trillion stock market as Typhoon Gaemi approaches Taiwan with strong winds and heavy rain. The nation is not conducting securities, currency or fixed income trading, statements from its stock and currency exchanges said. Authorities had yesterday issued a warning that the storm could affect people on land and canceled some ship crossings and domestic flights. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) expects its local chipmaking fabs to maintain normal production, the company said in an e-mailed statement. The main chipmaker for Apple Inc and Nvidia Corp said it has activated routine typhoon alert
GROWTH: TSMC increased its projected revenue growth for this year to more than 25 percent, citing stronger-than-expected demand for AI devices and smartphones The Taiwan Institute of Economic Research (TIER, 台灣經濟研究院) yesterday raised its forecast for Taiwan’s GDP growth this year from 3.29 percent to 3.85 percent, as exports and private investment recovered faster than it predicted three months ago. The Taipei-based think tank also expects that Taiwan would see a 8.19 percent increase in exports this year, better than the 7.55 percent it projected in April, as US technology giants spent more money on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and development. “There will be more AI servers going forward, but it remains to be seen if the momentum would extend to personal computers, smartphones and
Catastrophic computer outages caused by a software update from one company have once again exposed the dangers of global technological dependence on a handful of players, experts said on Friday. A flawed update sent out by the little-known security firm CrowdStrike Holdings Inc brought airlines, TV stations and myriad other aspects of daily life to a standstill. The outages affected companies or individuals that use CrowdStrike on the Microsoft Inc’s Windows platform. When they applied the update, the incompatible software crashed computers into a frozen state known as the “blue screen of death.” “Today CrowdStrike has become a household name, but not in