Taipei Times: Foreign companies have been complaining about barriers to and a lack of transparency in bids for government procurement contracts in their white papers for years. What is the commission's role in this area?
Hwang Tzong-leh (
PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES
Before the Government Procurement Act (
But we still look after issues that are not included in the government procurement regulations and involve fair-trade stipulations, such as unfair competition between the bid winners and competitors or subcontractors.
TT: Take the liquid natural gas (LNG) supply contract for Taipower's Tatan power plant in Taoyuan County. There have been queries about bidder qualifications made by the government at the time.
Hwang: Basically, the managing agency in this case is the Ministry of Economic Affairs and I think they have their own ways or procedures for making requirements. The commission respects the managing agency's authority, with the precondition that there is no violation of the Fair Trade Law (
I am not clear if the government agency intended to rule out foreign bidders in this case. But this was not such a violation of fair trade rules. If there exist illegal actions such as bid-rigging, which infringes the fair trade regulations, we will then step in.
TT: Then does the Fair Trade Law extend protection to foreign investors in Taiwan?
Hwang: Foreign companies are undoubtedly under the protection of the Fair Trade Law. We treat them equally without discrimination in this respect. They have the same rights and, of course, bear the same obligations as their local peers in complying with the regulations.
Take Esso Petroleum Taiwan Inc (
We then undertook to investigate whether the local suppliers had unduly reduced prices to hinder newcomers from entering the market. But after an investigation, we found that the scale of the price cuts by the two local refiners did not exceed legal limitations. [Editor's note: Esso Petroleum withdrew from Taiwan last year because of increasing losses and the small-scale of the local market.]
TT: Taiwan's two major oil refiners almost always adjust their wholesale oil prices at the same time, with the same markup or reduction. Would this qualify as collusion under the Fair Trade Law?
Hwang: Oil prices are an issue that most people are concerned about, as well as being the focus of media and legislative attention. The most critical concern is whether there exists a "concerted action" between the two oil suppliers to jointly raise prices.
The two companies have raised oil prices 17 times between 2002 and last month. We have also probed the price hikes twice over the same period. The result of our investigations suggested that there was no clear evidence, no form of obvious agreement or tacit understanding, in the joint price hikes. However, given the timing and scale of the previous price hikes, we did warn the companies against acting as an illegal cartel.
We will keep our eyes on any improper price changes by the monopolistic Chinese Petroleum as well as any collusion in price hikes by two major suppliers if there is any price adjustment in the future.
TT: Besides oil, prices of steel and necessities of life such as flour, sugar and sticky rice have been rising since the beginning of the year, resulting in alleged hoarding. Have you found an evidence of illegitimate stockpiling?
Hwang: We cannot rule out the possibility that businessmen plan to make more money by exploiting natural price hikes. The question is whether they make undue profits, far more than they deserve.
On the necessities of life, we focus our investigation on any hoarding, artificial manipulation of prices or joint markup by wholesalers or distribution networks. But we also need to be careful not to force down market prices while launching an investigation.
The price of sticky rice is a good example. Price and supply have become stable since we stepped in earlier this year. Considering that an oversupply could backfire on farmers, who are usually among the disadvantaged and victims of unfair trade, we had to keep a fine balance between an all-out investigation and substantial benefits for farmers.
Moral persuasion could be our first choice and punishment reserved as the last resort. But, as these cases are in course of investigation and have not been submitted to the commissioners for a final decision, I am not allowed to disclose the details and it is too early to gauge the results.
TT: The EU imposed a huge fine of 497 million euros (US$613 million) on Microsoft Corp for exploiting monopoly power in late March. Has this inspired the commission to resume its investigation into the US software giant after reaching administrative reconciliation last year?
Hwang: The EU and Taiwan are two different entities and the two parties' focus is different as well.
Unlike European countries, there are no Taiwanese companies suffering from unfair competition because of Microsoft's monopoly of the market. Therefore, we put much of our stress on the company's improper pricing.
The investigation into Microsoft was the commission's largest case ever, with most investment of manpower and effort. This case also earned us most front-page coverage.
Considering that a long drawn out investigation and possible appeals by Microsoft might not have been beneficial to consumers, we thought administrative reconciliation would be an ideal and timely method that would serve the best interest of all the parties.
TT: Do you think the administrative reconciliation ruling will work? Will you resume an investigation?
Hwang: We think the reconciliation agreement successfully forced the company to cut product prices by more than 20 percent and to share the source code of part of its products with the government and private sector clients.
We would probably not resume our investigation unless the company fails to comply with the agreement or other fair trade regulations, but certainly we will keep watching Microsoft's implementation of the terms in the agreement as long as it remains valid, which is until 2008.
TT: What are difficulties facing the commission in handling cases so far?
Hwang: We have been suffering from manpower shortages in handling a variety of unfair trade cases at the same time with around 200 staffers, especially in dealing with such significant, high profile cases as Microsoft's.
We are aware that it is a global trend to undertake government restructuring. However, fair trade cases actually increase as a country advances. Take Japan for example. Its fair trade authority has added more manpower whereas other agencies are reducing their staff numbers.
With multilevel marketing as our major focus in the next three years, we do hope for an increase in personnel and funds in order to set up a division exclusively responsible for this area.
TT: Taiwan became member of the Competition Committee under the Organization of Cooperation and Development (OECD) in 2002. What does this mean to Taiwan? What kind of role does the commission play and what is its achievement in the OECD?
Hwang: This was indeed a breakthrough for Taiwan and an opportunity for us to be one of the architects of international competition standards.
By sharing our policy-making process and implementation experience during the annual meetings and helping provide funds for the OECD to hold global or Asian forums, we are building closer connections with the international community.
Given our reputation in this area, we are helping Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam by offering assistance in the enactment and enforcement of laws. Thailand, for example, also sent two of its officials here to observe and study how Taiwan carries out its fair trade regulations. The OECD also asked for our comments on China's competition bill which is currently being formulated.
TT: What are your plans for enhancing international cooperation?
Hwang: We are scheduling a visit to the EU in September to explore this likelihood. The US, Canada and Japan are also our targets for enhancing future trans-national collaboration. We may start from a single case and then move gradually to formal bilateral cooperation relations.
We expect to expand our trilateral agreement with Australia and New Zealand [signed in 2002] to a regional competition framework by including the US and Canada in the future. But that will take quite some time.
‘SWASTICAR’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s close association with Donald Trump has prompted opponents to brand him a ‘Nazi’ and resulted in a dramatic drop in sales Demonstrators descended on Tesla Inc dealerships across the US, and in Europe and Canada on Saturday to protest company chief Elon Musk, who has amassed extraordinary power as a top adviser to US President Donald Trump. Waving signs with messages such as “Musk is stealing our money” and “Reclaim our country,” the protests largely took place peacefully following fiery episodes of vandalism on Tesla vehicles, dealerships and other facilities in recent weeks that US officials have denounced as terrorism. Hundreds rallied on Saturday outside the Tesla dealership in Manhattan. Some blasted Musk, the world’s richest man, while others demanded the shuttering of his
ADVERSARIES: The new list includes 11 entities in China and one in Taiwan, which is a local branch of Chinese cloud computing firm Inspur Group The US added dozens of entities to a trade blacklist on Tuesday, the US Department of Commerce said, in part to disrupt Beijing’s artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing capabilities. The action affects 80 entities from countries including China, the United Arab Emirates and Iran, with the commerce department citing their “activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy.” Those added to the “entity list” are restricted from obtaining US items and technologies without government authorization. “We will not allow adversaries to exploit American technology to bolster their own militaries and threaten American lives,” US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said. The entities
Taiwan’s official purchasing managers’ index (PMI) last month rose 0.2 percentage points to 54.2, in a second consecutive month of expansion, thanks to front-loading demand intended to avoid potential US tariff hikes, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. While short-term demand appeared robust, uncertainties rose due to US President Donald Trump’s unpredictable trade policy, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) told a news conference in Taipei. Taiwan’s economy this year would be characterized by high-level fluctuations and the volatility would be wilder than most expect, Lien said Demand for electronics, particularly semiconductors, continues to benefit from US technology giants’ effort
Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲) yesterday told lawmakers that she “would not speculate,” but a “response plan” has been prepared in case Taiwan is targeted by US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, which are to be announced on Wednesday next week. The Trump administration, including US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, has said that much of the proposed reciprocal tariffs would focus on the 15 countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US. Bessent has referred to those countries as the “dirty 15,” but has not named them. Last year, Taiwan’s US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US