As a truck driver hauling crude from private wells sprouting up all over this arid countryside, Gao had a bird's-eye view of the oil boom that was sweeping this county in the 1990s. After years of hesitation, he did what tens of thousands of other folks were doing: collected his savings and contributions from every friend and relative he could, and drilled a well.
The total investment was US$84,000, a princely sum in northern Shaanxi Province, a hardscrabble moonscape of dusty, yellow-earth hills at the edge of the Gobi Desert. But it seemed worth it when the black crude began to flow -- until the day in 2003 when the government seized Gao's well and thousands of other private wells, paying a fraction of their value.
What followed has been called one of the most important legal battles ever fought in modern China, as investors like Gao -- he would not identify himself further -- banded together in a class action to challenge the seizures, and to push the government as never before to respect its own rules, broadly redefined in 2003, giving private property legal status equal to that of the state.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
China first allowed its citizens to sue the government in 1990. But this case is special. It is by common estimate the largest suit ever brought against the government, has drawn major domestic media attention and involves oil, which China now avidly seeks around the globe.
Many of the investors have been detained; the authorities have invoked laws against illegal assembly and disturbing the public order. Lawyers have been banned from talking to the press and the plaintiffs' lead counsel, Zhu Jiuhu (
For those in China who urge a strong, transparent justice system, the prospectors' demand for better compensation or restitution of their wells goes to the heart of the question of what sort of society China is to become: one of full property rights and equal protection before the law, or one of arbitrary decisions imposed by fiat and without appeal.
"If common people have to accept whatever unpredictable changes the government makes, then our litigation code may as well be abolished, because that would mean the public is not allowed to sue the government," said one person who is close to the case and who withheld his name to avoid arrest.
"Why don't we just abolish the profession of law altogether?" he said.
Li Heping, who represents the plaintiffs' lawyer, said the judicial system itself was at stake.
"Lawyers believe that Mr. Zhu has always acted within the law," Li said. "He never imagined that what he did could be regarded as breaking the law. If he is prosecuted, China's legal system will mourn."
Zhu's wife said he was formally arrested on June 22, after weeks of detention in Jingbian, during which the authorities denied holding him.
Northern Shaanxi's oil boom was made possible by sweeping changes in 1994 by the oil ministry and the China National Petroleum Corp (
But a few months after Gao struck oil, Beijing rescinded private prospecting rights. The plaintiffs say they were never told.
"Local governments actually encouraged investors to drill more oil wells between January and November 2000, and signed lots of long-term investment contracts," wrote one, Feng Bingxian (馮秉先), who is in hiding and answered a reporter's questions through a computer messaging service.
He argued his case before a legal seminar at Beijing's Great Hall of the People last year.
"In the year 2000 alone, over 2,000 wells were drilled," Feng wrote, "which is about a third of the total number of wells in the area."
In 2003, when the provincial government seized the private wells, it offered a total of US$242 million. Many investors said that would cover only about a third of their outlays, and accused local officials of profiteering and conflicts of interest.
Beijing has so far said nothing publicly about the dispute.
But in May, the mayor of one oil-rich town in northern Shaanxi told reporters that allowing the private investments had been "a beautiful mistake."
Asked what this meant, Liu Xuming, another city official, said: "At first our government was too poor to produce oil, and that's why private investment was sought. But that decision is not in the same spirit as central and provincial government policy now."
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
REGIONAL STABILITY: Taipei thanked the Biden administration for authorizing its 16th sale of military goods and services to uphold Taiwan’s defense and safety The US Department of State has approved the sale of US$228 million of military goods and services to Taiwan, the US Department of Defense said on Monday. The state department “made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale” to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US for “return, repair and reshipment of spare parts and related equipment,” the defense department’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release. Taiwan had requested the purchase of items and services which include the “return, repair and reshipment of classified and unclassified spare parts for aircraft and related equipment; US Government
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from