When Eliot Spitzer became New York's attorney-general six years ago, few expected much of him or from the office he won control of only after a Florida-style recount and expenditure of a good deal of his father's money.
Nowadays, nobody is in doubt what the 45-year-old prosecutor stands for. With swagger and arrogance, he has single-handedly taken the good fight to Wall Street -- and won. Almost every week he starts another high-profile fight with yet another industry; where federal regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) slumber, Spitzer crusades.
PHOTO: AP
His targets have included everyone from securities analysts and investment bankers to the US$7.5 trillion mutual fund industry, polluting power plants and supermarket chains that underpaid delivery workers. Earlier this year, he tangled with former New York Stock Exchange chief Richard Grasso over his US$200 million "golden parachute" and in June took aim at GlaxoSmithKline, saying it withheld safety data on its anti-depressant for children.
In September he clashed with Marsh & McLennan, the US' largest insurance firm, threatened to investigate the music industry for the decades-old practice of payola and won a pay rise for the toilet attendants at fancy restaurants.
Like many New York prosecutors before him (including former mayor Rudy Giuliani), he had made a name for himself prosecuting Mafia dons. But by the early 1990s, Mafiosi were comparatively soft targets -- good for crime-fighting publicity, but more of a nuisance than a worthy adversary for a young man whose jaw, the New York Times wrote, "actually juts."
But Spitzer's technique is not to put the cuffs on executives, but to threaten their firms with financial ruin. His forebears, such as Giuliani, liked to try cases; Spitzer likes to settle. Indeed, such is his reputation that the announcement of a Spitzer investigation is an excuse to sell and an invitation for shareholder law-suits and proxy campaigns.
During last year's mutual fund scandal he said he was not shy of imposing the "death penalty" -- bringing charges even if it meant driving them out of business.
"Where there's recidivism, whether it's a robbery or a street crime, there will be no second chance," Spitzer said. "That may mean the death penalty for them. In my view that's the only option we are now left with."
As a result, firms almost invariably agree to punishment, remedy, and structural change rather than suffer the consequences. In the case of the recent insurance fraud investigation, the stocks of the biggest players implicated, Marsh & McLen-nan and AIG, have lost a combined US$38 billion in market capitalization since the investigation was announced on Oct. 14.
Indeed, it's come to the point that firms would rather settle than be probed, let alone prosecuted. Marsh & McLennan is a case in point. When Spitzer asked the firm about its practice of receiving "contingent commissions" from insurance companies, Marsh apparently denied the practice (Spitzer called the fees "kickbacks") and, according to the attorney-general, "fed us the same foolishness they've been feeding the public over the years."
According to Spitzer, roughly US$800 million of the US$1.5 billion in net income Marsh earned last year came from those commissions.
Alleged wrongdoing is one thing, but stonewalling Spitzer is another. He vowed he would not negotiate with the existing management and last week forced the resignation of Marsh chief executive officer Jeffrey Greenberg, son of Hank Green-berg, the legendary boss of insurance giant American International Group (AIG).
Along with a rumored US$500 million settlement (Spitzer's office says it will be far higher), Spitzer has effectively replaced Greenberg with one of his own -- Michael Cherkasky, head of Kroll, Marsh's corporate security and investigations unit, and formerly Spitzer's boss at the Manhattan district attorney's office.
Though few will say it for fear of becoming a target, there is growing criticism that Spitzer is using his power to prosecute corporate malfeasance to further his political ambitions. If true, he would not be the first. From Theodore Roosevelt, who served as New York City police commissioner, to Giuliani, who used his crime- fighting credentials to win the New York City mayoral race, and presidential contender Senator John Kerry, being a prosecutor is a way up the ladder.
For all the attention he enjoys (he was Time's Crusader of the Year in 2002, and was among New York magazine's "50 Sexiest New Yor-kers") there is broader criticism that he abuses his prosecutorial tools. And he has clearly rubbed up people with powerful friends in Washington the wrong way.
Last year, he won a ruling that forced the Bush administration to reverse its rollback of pollution regulations that applied to big utilities.
The White House has urged Spitzer to be more supportive of US industry, saying his efforts are counterproductive. But Spitzer says he took on the issue for the same reasons he took on Wall Street -- because government wasn't doing it.
"They've tried to handcuff us," he said.
But it looks as if one man is ready to fight back -- Grasso. Spitzer wants Grasso to return US$140 million in compensation he received when he left the stock exchange; Grasso, accuses Spitzer of getting involved for personal gain, saying it's "clear that Mr Spitzer is running for governor in 2006 and running hard."
Spitzer is unrepentant.
"I like it when people push back. It's what I would do," he said.
But the Grasso compensation dispute speaks to a larger issue -- that of executive compensation and the question of how much a CEO is worth. In other words, Spitzer is taking on the incestuous, clubby world of compensation committees that reward themselves and each other and keep driving chief executive pay higher.
"The nature of CEO compensation is something that deserves additional scrutiny," he has said. "One of the things that will emerge from the Grasso investigation is the failure of compensation committees to fulfil their obligations."
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
REGIONAL STABILITY: Taipei thanked the Biden administration for authorizing its 16th sale of military goods and services to uphold Taiwan’s defense and safety The US Department of State has approved the sale of US$228 million of military goods and services to Taiwan, the US Department of Defense said on Monday. The state department “made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale” to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US for “return, repair and reshipment of spare parts and related equipment,” the defense department’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release. Taiwan had requested the purchase of items and services which include the “return, repair and reshipment of classified and unclassified spare parts for aircraft and related equipment; US Government
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from