A US federal judge ruled on Thursday that Oracle, the US' second-largest software company, could proceed with its hostile bid for PeopleSoft, handing the Justice Department a rare defeat in a legal challenge to a corporate merger.
The Justice Department sought to block Oracle's US$7.7 billion offer for PeopleSoft on the grounds that combining the two companies would reduce competition in the market for software that large corporations use to manage their finances and employee records.
But Judge Vaughn Walker of the US District Court in San Francisco rejected the government's definition of the market as too narrow, noting that the software business is particularly dynamic, with a host of current and emerging competitors in that area, including Microsoft.
Antitrust experts and industry analysts said the court decision, which can be appealed, could open the way for more mergers in the software industry if big companies like Oracle, IBM and Microsoft feel less constrained by the prospect of antitrust challenges. The European Commission is continuing to investigate the proposed merger.
"Oracle may be the biggest beneficiary of this ruling, but it makes acquisitions to consolidate the industry easier for others as well," said Charles Di Bona, a software analyst for Sanford Bernstein & Co.
Microsoft, the world's biggest software company, played a prominent role in the trial even though it was not a party to the case. Fear of Microsoft's market power was part of Oracle's motivation in seeking a merger.
In the six-week trial this summer, Oracle insisted that buying PeopleSoft was essential to its strategy of expanding to cope with increasing competition from Microsoft.
On the eve of the trial, Microsoft was forced to disclose that it had talked with SAP, the big German business software maker, about acquiring that company. And during the trial, witnesses for Oracle pointed repeatedly to Microsoft's ambitions and aggressive spending in the business software market.
Asked to comment on Thursday, Andrew Gavil, a law professor at Howard University, said, "The entry of another formidable competitor makes it harder to argue that it is a stable market where entry is difficult and the acquisition would really hurt competition."
The Justice Department, however, argued that the merger of Oracle, the second-largest company in the business software arena, and PeopleSoft, the third-largest, would create a "duopoly" that would harm consumers.
"The merger would end fierce head-to-head competition that has brought customers lower prices and better products," said Claude Scott, the government's lead lawyer, in closing arguments on July 20.
But Walker did not find that argument sufficiently convincing. "Plaintiffs have not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the merger of Oracle and PeopleSoft is likely to substantially lessen competition in a relevant product and geographic market," he wrote in a 164-page ruling.
Walker found that the market for business software was a global one, and not limited to the US. And he also noted that several other companies, including Microsoft and Lawson Software, were competing in the field.
PeopleSoft executives would not comment on the decision directly, saying only that its directors would review the implications of the ruling. The news caused PeopleSoft's shares to jump 15 percent to US$20.57 in after-hours trading, after closing at US$17.95.
The unusual corporate takeover battle began in June last year, when Oracle made the first of four hostile offers for PeopleSoft, a maker of financial and human resources software. At the time, Oracle's famously outspoken chief executive and founder, Lawrence Ellison, said candidly that he had scant interest in PeopleSoft's technology or products. Oracle, he said, was mainly interested in acquiring PeopleSoft's corporate customers and switching them to Oracle's competing software.
Oracle's move, Ellison asserted, was merely one step in the inevitable consolidation in the software industry that was necessary because of slower long-term growth for the technology sector.
This elicited outrage from PeopleSoft, which is based in Pleasanton, California, and accusations that Ellison was merely trying to destroy a competitor by driving away PeopleSoft's customers with a lengthy takeover battle. The PeopleSoft board has rejected all four offers, including the last offer of US$21 for each PeopleSoft share.
The Justice Department said it was reviewing the ruling and had not yet decided whether to appeal.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from