A US federal judge ruled on Thursday that Oracle, the US' second-largest software company, could proceed with its hostile bid for PeopleSoft, handing the Justice Department a rare defeat in a legal challenge to a corporate merger.
The Justice Department sought to block Oracle's US$7.7 billion offer for PeopleSoft on the grounds that combining the two companies would reduce competition in the market for software that large corporations use to manage their finances and employee records.
But Judge Vaughn Walker of the US District Court in San Francisco rejected the government's definition of the market as too narrow, noting that the software business is particularly dynamic, with a host of current and emerging competitors in that area, including Microsoft.
Antitrust experts and industry analysts said the court decision, which can be appealed, could open the way for more mergers in the software industry if big companies like Oracle, IBM and Microsoft feel less constrained by the prospect of antitrust challenges. The European Commission is continuing to investigate the proposed merger.
"Oracle may be the biggest beneficiary of this ruling, but it makes acquisitions to consolidate the industry easier for others as well," said Charles Di Bona, a software analyst for Sanford Bernstein & Co.
Microsoft, the world's biggest software company, played a prominent role in the trial even though it was not a party to the case. Fear of Microsoft's market power was part of Oracle's motivation in seeking a merger.
In the six-week trial this summer, Oracle insisted that buying PeopleSoft was essential to its strategy of expanding to cope with increasing competition from Microsoft.
On the eve of the trial, Microsoft was forced to disclose that it had talked with SAP, the big German business software maker, about acquiring that company. And during the trial, witnesses for Oracle pointed repeatedly to Microsoft's ambitions and aggressive spending in the business software market.
Asked to comment on Thursday, Andrew Gavil, a law professor at Howard University, said, "The entry of another formidable competitor makes it harder to argue that it is a stable market where entry is difficult and the acquisition would really hurt competition."
The Justice Department, however, argued that the merger of Oracle, the second-largest company in the business software arena, and PeopleSoft, the third-largest, would create a "duopoly" that would harm consumers.
"The merger would end fierce head-to-head competition that has brought customers lower prices and better products," said Claude Scott, the government's lead lawyer, in closing arguments on July 20.
But Walker did not find that argument sufficiently convincing. "Plaintiffs have not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the merger of Oracle and PeopleSoft is likely to substantially lessen competition in a relevant product and geographic market," he wrote in a 164-page ruling.
Walker found that the market for business software was a global one, and not limited to the US. And he also noted that several other companies, including Microsoft and Lawson Software, were competing in the field.
PeopleSoft executives would not comment on the decision directly, saying only that its directors would review the implications of the ruling. The news caused PeopleSoft's shares to jump 15 percent to US$20.57 in after-hours trading, after closing at US$17.95.
The unusual corporate takeover battle began in June last year, when Oracle made the first of four hostile offers for PeopleSoft, a maker of financial and human resources software. At the time, Oracle's famously outspoken chief executive and founder, Lawrence Ellison, said candidly that he had scant interest in PeopleSoft's technology or products. Oracle, he said, was mainly interested in acquiring PeopleSoft's corporate customers and switching them to Oracle's competing software.
Oracle's move, Ellison asserted, was merely one step in the inevitable consolidation in the software industry that was necessary because of slower long-term growth for the technology sector.
This elicited outrage from PeopleSoft, which is based in Pleasanton, California, and accusations that Ellison was merely trying to destroy a competitor by driving away PeopleSoft's customers with a lengthy takeover battle. The PeopleSoft board has rejected all four offers, including the last offer of US$21 for each PeopleSoft share.
The Justice Department said it was reviewing the ruling and had not yet decided whether to appeal.
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2