A plan to boost taxes on US citizens living abroad while slashing other taxes is drawing an angry response from businesses as well as organizations representing US expatriates.
The bill drafted by the Senate Finance Committee, which seeks to cut some US$350 billion overall over a 10-year period, would recoup some of that by eliminating a longstanding tax exemption for Americans living overseas.
The Senate bill still must be reconciled with legislation passed by the House of Representatives.
To offset some of the tax cuts, the Senate plan includes proposals to raise revenues by eliminating tax breaks to some US firms that move offshore, and -- in a more controversial move -- ending the US$80,000 annual income exclusion for US citizens abroad, known as the Section 911 exclusion.
Without that exclusion, most Americans abroad would be taxed twice, because the US, unlike most other countries, taxes its citizens living anywhere in the world.
David Hamod, a Washington consultant and executive director of the Section 911 Coalition, which represents US firms, chambers of commerce and schools operating overseas, said the Senate panel made a huge mistake.
"The committee was looking for a quick fix, but I don't think they fully understood the magnitude of what they were doing," Hamod said, arguing that the exemption for US workers abroad got muddled in with the question of offshore tax shelters.
"There was some confusion about offshore companies and overseas Americans, but the two are almost diametrically opposed. ... Sending Americans abroad creates jobs and promotes American exports."
But Senator Charles Grassley, who crafted the bill, said it was no mistake.
"Part of tax relief is tax fairness," he said. "I have to ask whether it's fair for taxpayers to underwrite the cost of sending employees overseas ... an American soldier who spends a year in Kabul has to pay his full US tax obligation, but an American working for a private company in Bermuda pays no taxes."
Opponents contend that companies and employees would face double taxation under the proposal.
"The tax exclusion for overseas income should be expanded, not scrapped," said Thomas Donohue, president of the US Chamber of Commerce.
"These workers play a vital role in promoting our national interests, and their presence helps support US exports and creates US-based jobs."
Official estimates put the number of US private citizens abroad at around four million, but Hamod said the figure is closer to 10 million, because the official number includes only those who have registered with US embassies.
Congressional experts say that ending the tax exclusion would bring in some US$35 billion over 10 years.
US business groups with overseas links and others have started an intense lobbying campaign to maintain the exclusion, arguing that the Senate bill would make it much harder and more costly to send Americans to overseas posts.
"The United States is one of the few nations to tax its citizens when they live and work in other nations -- the misguided practice of `worldwide' taxation," said Daniel Mitchell, a researcher at the conservative Heritage Foundation.
Eliminating the exclusion, said Mitchell, "hurts US companies trying to compete in global markets and reduces American exports. It also is a form of double taxation, since US citizens employed in other nations are subject to all applicable taxes in those nations."
Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle said his party would fight to strip out that provision in the bill.
"There are tens of thousands of people who work abroad and work with an understanding that they're helping America's economy because of our globalized economic interdependence," he said.
"We need people abroad to take those jobs, to continue to grow this economy as much as we can ... This is a huge tax increase on working families all over the world at the very time when we need them, perhaps, even more than ever."
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2