Microsoft Corp's settlement of the US government's antitrust suit won't restore competition or prevent the world's largest software maker from continuing to bully competitors, Massachusetts and West Virginia said in court papers.
The attorneys general of the two states appealed a trial judge's refusal to impose tougher remedies than Microsoft agreed to in the settlement negotiated after an appeals court held the company illegally protected its Windows monopoly for personal computer operating software.
Massachusetts and West Virginia told the same appeals court that US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly failed to carry out her mandate when she approved the settlement and rejected proposals to put more restrictions on Microsoft's business practices.
"The flaws in the remedy adopted by the district court are profound," the two states said.
"It does not fulfill even the most basic mission of stopping all the practices" found illegal, and it won't "restore competition and deny Microsoft the fruits of its illegal conduct," Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas Reilly and West Virginia Attorney General Darrell McGraw said in their appeal brief.
The full US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is scheduled to hear arguments Nov. 4.
The settlement, which was initially rejected by half the 18 states that joined the Justice Department in the case, requires Microsoft to give computer makers freedom to promote rival software that compete with its Windows Media Player or the Internet Explorer Web browser.
Massachusetts and West Virginia argued that Kollar-Kotelly defied the appeals court's June 2001 order to prevent Microsoft from continuing to "commingle" browser and operating software code to protect its illegal monopoly.
The states urged the court to direct Kollar-Kotelly to order "a remedy that will ensure that Microsoft's unlawful conduct is met with more than a request that the company not repeat its transgressions."
The judge held 32 days of hearings last year on the proposals by nine states, led by California, Iowa and Connecticut. All the states except West Virginia and Massachusetts dropped their fight against Microsoft after she approved the settlement in November.
Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said Kollar-Kotelly's rulings "represent a fair resolution of this case" and noted that "only two" states are still pressing the case.
Kollar-Kotelly rejected the nine states' proposals to force Microsoft to make a "modular" version of Windows from which computer makers could easily remove the Internet Explorer browser.
She also refused to force Microsoft to make broad disclosures of computer code that competitors need to write programs that run on Windows, which powers 95 percent of the world's PCs.
A settlement provision allowing computer makers to hide access to Internet Explorer without removing any code won Kollar-Kotelly's approval "even though no evidence established that such remedy would address the unlawful conduct identified by this court and substantial evidence established that it would not," the states said.
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2