One can't precisely applaud the court judgment in Bangkok on Friday by which Thaksin Shinawatra was acquitted of corruption charges relating to his conduct while serving in a previous government. Even the Thai prime minister admitted to the events in question, if not his responsibility for them.
But I may as well sigh my sighs of relief straight away. It is a hard call: Whatever the verdict handed down by Thailand's Constitutional Court, neither outcome would have arrived without its costs. On balance, however, Thailand is better off with this highly popular and clearly capable leader in office rather than on the sidelines shouting onto the field like a frustrated football coach.
PHOTO: REUTERS
It is little surprise that the Stock Exchange of Thailand Index popped more than 2 percent in the brief interval between the judges' ruling and the end of trading, closing up over 4 percent on the day; turnover advanced to 10.7 billion baht (US$236 million), a better than 60 percent increase on the year's daily average.
While the rally reflected the sudden end to months of mounting tension over Thaksin's fate, it also suggested something larger: Top to bottom in Thailand, there seems to be a widespread assumption that what we're now calling "Thaksinomics" offers enough vision and direction to be worth trying.
"Today the clouds of uncertainty have left Thailand," Thaksin said after the ruling was announced, "which makes the country hopeful and determined to leap forward." That's about it, in my view. Thaksin's political survival comes with problems, but hope and determination are what Thais need just now, and the tycoon-turned-populist-politician, elected in January by an immense majority, is in a position to inspire both.
Opposition politicians, reformists and democratic activists were volubly critical of the 8-to-7 ruling by a panel of the nation's highest judges. And they have a strong case. Thaksin acknowledged that his chauffeur, security guards and maids all held rather considerable stock portfolios while he served as Cabinet minister in the 1990s. Hard to see how the judiciary found its way to deciding, as Thaksin claimed, that this was not deliberate.
Given the amount of political pressure the judges faced in the days before their ruling, there's no arguing the point: Thailand's advance toward democratic institutions and the rule of law is essential, and this is a setback for both the National Counter-Corruption Commission and the reform constitution of 1997 under which it was set up.
But is there any arguing that Thaksin's removal from office, which would have followed a guilty finding, would have been even more damaging for Thailand? I don't think so. A less-than-forthright judicial decision must be regretted, but bad court verdicts don't generally sink democracies -- not the way coups or the absence of leadership do.
Americans, to take an obvious example, now have a president who sits in office by way of another bad court verdict. They are surviving it, if not altogether happily.
It is cold comfort, but those critical of Thaksin's acquittal are now left to measure Thai democracy's progress by the number and volume of their own voices.
Thaksin's conduct represents an undesirable aspect of Thailand's past, and Thais are to be commended for repudiating it.
At the same time, ditching assets in odd places has long been something like business as usual in Thailand; it is certainly not a practice that distinguishes Thaksin from many of his peers in the business and political communities.
Equally, Thais discouraged by last week's court verdict ought to balance their perspective by recognizing that their present leader has stepped forward with an idea of the future that takes Thailand far beyond any advanced by any of his predecessors.
Yes, many of his proposals have prompted controversy. They are too populist, many argue. The Thai Asset Management Corp, unveiled in late-June to manage the nation's lingering bad loans, has been justly criticized in its initial phase for benefiting state-owned banks far more than those in the private sector equally in need of relief.
But let's look beyond the short-term tactical kinks to the long-term strategic vision. At the core of Thaksin's thinking is a fundamental shift away from the East Asian export model we're all familiar with. The intent is to encourage small and medium size enterprises -- SMEs, a set of letters we'll be using a lot more often in Asia over coming years.
These companies are the replacement engines of Thaksin's "alternative development model," as Daniel Lian, economist with investment bank Morgan Stanley Dean Witter in Singapore, calls it in a just-issued report. By using Thailand's "locally embedded skills" more thoughtfully, Lian argues, SMEs can keep the nation in the global game while leveraging it beyond the dead end of its present status as a low-wage export platform.
"Asia needs to either dismantle or reinvent the export model," Lian writes. "Thaksin's new economic paradigm could be an alternative to it." Understanding Mr Thaksin's New Development Model, as Lian titles the results of his research, is the most interesting take now available on one of the most interesting efforts in the region to break a pattern that, as Lian writes, "has outlived its usefulness."
Oddly for a piece of market analysis, it has as much to say to street-level activists in Bangkok as it does to foreign investors trying to comprehend a complex nation in transition.
Thaksin will now serve with a taint. It's unfortunate, but I doubt it will impair his long-term effectiveness as a leader -- which is something that can only now be proven.
"Forget the past, start the future," the prime minister urged after the court ruling was announced. I hope Thais reject that bit of euphoria-driven advice. How about, "Learn from the past and advance beyond it?"
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from