One can't precisely applaud the court judgment in Bangkok on Friday by which Thaksin Shinawatra was acquitted of corruption charges relating to his conduct while serving in a previous government. Even the Thai prime minister admitted to the events in question, if not his responsibility for them.
But I may as well sigh my sighs of relief straight away. It is a hard call: Whatever the verdict handed down by Thailand's Constitutional Court, neither outcome would have arrived without its costs. On balance, however, Thailand is better off with this highly popular and clearly capable leader in office rather than on the sidelines shouting onto the field like a frustrated football coach.
PHOTO: REUTERS
It is little surprise that the Stock Exchange of Thailand Index popped more than 2 percent in the brief interval between the judges' ruling and the end of trading, closing up over 4 percent on the day; turnover advanced to 10.7 billion baht (US$236 million), a better than 60 percent increase on the year's daily average.
While the rally reflected the sudden end to months of mounting tension over Thaksin's fate, it also suggested something larger: Top to bottom in Thailand, there seems to be a widespread assumption that what we're now calling "Thaksinomics" offers enough vision and direction to be worth trying.
"Today the clouds of uncertainty have left Thailand," Thaksin said after the ruling was announced, "which makes the country hopeful and determined to leap forward." That's about it, in my view. Thaksin's political survival comes with problems, but hope and determination are what Thais need just now, and the tycoon-turned-populist-politician, elected in January by an immense majority, is in a position to inspire both.
Opposition politicians, reformists and democratic activists were volubly critical of the 8-to-7 ruling by a panel of the nation's highest judges. And they have a strong case. Thaksin acknowledged that his chauffeur, security guards and maids all held rather considerable stock portfolios while he served as Cabinet minister in the 1990s. Hard to see how the judiciary found its way to deciding, as Thaksin claimed, that this was not deliberate.
Given the amount of political pressure the judges faced in the days before their ruling, there's no arguing the point: Thailand's advance toward democratic institutions and the rule of law is essential, and this is a setback for both the National Counter-Corruption Commission and the reform constitution of 1997 under which it was set up.
But is there any arguing that Thaksin's removal from office, which would have followed a guilty finding, would have been even more damaging for Thailand? I don't think so. A less-than-forthright judicial decision must be regretted, but bad court verdicts don't generally sink democracies -- not the way coups or the absence of leadership do.
Americans, to take an obvious example, now have a president who sits in office by way of another bad court verdict. They are surviving it, if not altogether happily.
It is cold comfort, but those critical of Thaksin's acquittal are now left to measure Thai democracy's progress by the number and volume of their own voices.
Thaksin's conduct represents an undesirable aspect of Thailand's past, and Thais are to be commended for repudiating it.
At the same time, ditching assets in odd places has long been something like business as usual in Thailand; it is certainly not a practice that distinguishes Thaksin from many of his peers in the business and political communities.
Equally, Thais discouraged by last week's court verdict ought to balance their perspective by recognizing that their present leader has stepped forward with an idea of the future that takes Thailand far beyond any advanced by any of his predecessors.
Yes, many of his proposals have prompted controversy. They are too populist, many argue. The Thai Asset Management Corp, unveiled in late-June to manage the nation's lingering bad loans, has been justly criticized in its initial phase for benefiting state-owned banks far more than those in the private sector equally in need of relief.
But let's look beyond the short-term tactical kinks to the long-term strategic vision. At the core of Thaksin's thinking is a fundamental shift away from the East Asian export model we're all familiar with. The intent is to encourage small and medium size enterprises -- SMEs, a set of letters we'll be using a lot more often in Asia over coming years.
These companies are the replacement engines of Thaksin's "alternative development model," as Daniel Lian, economist with investment bank Morgan Stanley Dean Witter in Singapore, calls it in a just-issued report. By using Thailand's "locally embedded skills" more thoughtfully, Lian argues, SMEs can keep the nation in the global game while leveraging it beyond the dead end of its present status as a low-wage export platform.
"Asia needs to either dismantle or reinvent the export model," Lian writes. "Thaksin's new economic paradigm could be an alternative to it." Understanding Mr Thaksin's New Development Model, as Lian titles the results of his research, is the most interesting take now available on one of the most interesting efforts in the region to break a pattern that, as Lian writes, "has outlived its usefulness."
Oddly for a piece of market analysis, it has as much to say to street-level activists in Bangkok as it does to foreign investors trying to comprehend a complex nation in transition.
Thaksin will now serve with a taint. It's unfortunate, but I doubt it will impair his long-term effectiveness as a leader -- which is something that can only now be proven.
"Forget the past, start the future," the prime minister urged after the court ruling was announced. I hope Thais reject that bit of euphoria-driven advice. How about, "Learn from the past and advance beyond it?"
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2