The British pound slipped again to a 15-year low against the dollar on Friday, after a landslide electoral victory by the Labor Party amplified talk that Prime Minister Tony Blair may speed the replacement of the pound with the euro.
Many investors said the decision on whether Britain will join the 12-nation euro currency union will essentially be political. When William Hague resigned Friday after leading his Conservative Party to disastrous defeat on an anti-euro platform, it reinforced the perception that the outcome had lowered the political hurdles for Blair.
"Hague's departure certainly demonstrates that the `no' campaign has taken a heavy blow," said Graham Bishop, an independent economic consultant.
The election outcome was not a surprise, and speculators had begun pushing the pound down sharply two days before the balloting. But Hague's resignation set their hammers falling in earnest, and the pound was driven down to US$1.3775, lower than at any time since February 1986. It closed in New York at US$1.3806. Over all, in this election week, the pound lost 2.8 percent of its value against the dollar, and 2.7 percent against the euro in New York trading.
"I think it's got a bit overexcited, this whole euro story," said Michael Lewis, senior economist at Deutsche Bank, who said he nonetheless believed the pound could sink lower. Some big banks have lowered forecasts for sterling over the next few months, and one, WestLB in Germany, foresees US$1.34 to the pound this summer.
But economists said that there is little chance of a quick move to adopt the euro.
Before the election, Blair said he expected to decide within two years whether to take the most pivotal step, calling a referendum on adopting the euro. Gordon Brown, the finance minister, said Thursday that the process could take even longer, with two years spent just to assess whether membership in the euro zone would meet the five economic tests Britain has set for entry.
Public debate would follow the assessment, and only after that would a referendum be scheduled. Bishop, the consultant, said that at the soonest Blair might begin making a public case for adopting the euro in September.
Whatever the timing, analysts said, Blair leads a nation whose attitudes about the euro range from ambiguous to downright hostile. "The real obstacle lies not in the economic tests, but in whether the government can get the assent of the people in a referendum," said Ian Stewart, chief British economist at Merrill Lynch. He said he doubted a referendum could be held before 2003.
Hague sought to paint Thursday's election as a vote for or against British euro membership, saying repeatedly that the ballot was "the last chance to save the pound." His party's resounding defeat suggested that the rallying call did not resonate with voters.
On the other hand, opinion surveys since the euro was introduced in Continental Europe in January 1999 have consistently found that two-thirds of Britons oppose entry, though the same proportion said they think it is inevitable.
Beyond politics, complex economic and technical issues underscore the differences between Britain's possible dalliance with the euro and the Continent's marriage to it. The core euro-zone countries, especially France and Germany, had their economies and currencies marching in step for years before January 1999, while Britain has kept its own somewhat asynchronous economic rhythms and fell rather calamitously out of the exchange-rate coordination system in 1992.
Qualification for joining the euro depended on straightforward statistical criteria, but Britain's self-readiness tests are much woolier. ``I have to say that the government's tests are so broadly drawn that a lot will depend on the eye of the beholder,'' said Stewart at Merrill Lynch. And it was not clear whether Brown's Treasury or Blair's government as a whole would do the beholding.
The tests pose five questions:
-- Are the British and Continental European economies capable of "sustainable convergence?"
-- Can the euro cope flexibly with economic upheaval?
How would British membership affect investment?
-- What would the disappearance of the pound mean for the City, Britain's Wall Street?
-- Would euro membership increase British employment?
Beyond those issues, Brown wants to be assured that the European Central Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, whose policies and pronouncements on monetary policy have so far tended to confuse investors, can operate as openly and effectively as the Bank of England, whose autonomy in interest-rate policy was enshrined when Blair first took office in 1997.
Some of the economic gaps between Britain and the rest of Europe are closing. Benchmark interest rates set in Frankfurt and London are now just 0.75 of a percentage point apart, down from 4 points in 1999. Long-term rates are close together as well, and Britain's inflation is the lowest in Western Europe.
But there remains the thorny matter of negotiating the exchange rate at which Britain would join. Many investors expect the pound to be devalued sharply before entry.
The EU accounts for half of Britain's foreign trade, so the fates of the pound and euro are already linked. Bloomberg calculated this week that the two moved up or down in step against the dollar 92 percent of the time this year.
But "the current market rate would lock Britain in forever at an uncompetitive rate," said Michael Klawitter, a strategist at WestLB. When the pound is high, British exports cost too much to sell well overseas, while domestic producers are undercut by cheap imports.
British exporters want a substantial devaluation. "Ten percent off is a good starting point," said Bishop, the consultant.
"But then the question is: how to manage the rate downwards without provoking a serious sterling crisis?"
A rapid movement could ignite inflation, he said, provoking interest-rate increases from the Bank of England and widening the rate gap with Europe, just when it should be narrowing.
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2