Mon, Feb 18, 2019 - Page 4 News List

FEATURE: Special rural land rights for men roil Hong Kong


William Liu, a 22-year-old democracy activist, poses in the courtyard of Liu Man She Tong, an 18th-century ancestral hall belonging to his clan in Hong Kong’s New Territories on Jan. 10.

Photo: AFP

Sitting in the spacious courtyard of an 18th-century ancestral hall belonging to his clan, William Liu defiantly rejects a lucrative birthright that his special status as one of Hong Kong’s male indigenous villagers affords him.

Liu hails from the New Territories, which were leased by Britain from China in 1898. Under a colonial-era policy that remains in place, any male who can trace his lineage back to that period has the right to build a three-story house on his land without paying a land fee.

In a territory with the world’s least affordable property market, that exclusively male right is a major windfall, but it is being challenged in the courts as discriminatory to women and unfair to millions of Hong Kongers unable to get on the property ladder.

Liu is a villager who agrees with the case against the building rights.

“It’s an unfair policy and I will not use it,” the 22-year-old said.

Liu, a democracy activist, is opposed both to the discriminatory nature of the policy and the way the territory’s connected housing developers have still been able to use it to build properties.

“The small house policy has turned into something that is just being abused by a small handful of people working with developers to make money,” he said.

Liber Research Community, a land concern group, estimates that at least one out of four indigenous houses in the New Territories have been built illegally, with developers making secret deals with villagers to use their land rights.

Authorities largely turn a blind eye to the practice.

The so-called “ding rights” — named after the Cantonese word for male offspring — were enacted in 1972 by the British as an interim measure to improve living standards for farmers. It continued after the 1997 handover to China.

With the crammed territory facing an acute housing shortage, the New Territories’ vast land banks are being eyed for their development potential and calls are mounting for the government to overhaul the policy.

However, ding rights have been vociferously defended by the powerful Heung Yee Kuk, an advisory body that has dominated rural affairs for decades and delivers reliably pro-Beijing votes in the complex system that elects Hong Kong’s chief executive.

In a bid to alleviate its acute housing shortage, Hong Kong’s government has proposed spending about US$63 billion on building artificial islands that could accommodate a new city around a fifth the size of Manhattan.

The proposal has sparked protests over both the enormous cost and the potential environmental damage.

Chan Kim-ching (陳劍青), the founder of the Liber research group, said the government should overhaul how land is allocated in the New Territories and make it more accessible to everyone.

“That could improve the environment, cancel out some of the unequal situation and solve our housing demand at the same time,” he said.

A government spokesperson and Heung Yee Kuk chair Kenneth Lau both declined to comment on the policy, citing the ongoing legal challenge.

Indigenous villagers, who along with ding rights also enjoy other special benefits including some exclusive burial rights, are often seen as an unfairly privileged group, but they argue the policy does not mean they are guaranteed a house immediately, even if they own their land.

Indigenous local Selena Yung says she experienced discrimination as a woman in the villages, but she supports the house policy, noting it benefited her two sons — whose applications were approved after waiting for more than a decade.

This story has been viewed 2655 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top