A US land-swap plan to redraw the borders of Kosovo backed by the US is facing a growing chorus of criticism inside the republic, in the wider region and internationally.
Kosovar President Hashim Thaci and his Serbian counterpart Aleksandar Vui have suggested that an exchange of territory could be part of a deal that would pave the way for a final settlement between Belgrade and Pristina.
Kosovo broke from Serbia in 1999 and declared its independence in 2008, which Belgrade has never recognized.
Vui and Thaci have met regularly under the auspices of EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini to hammer out a deal that could put Kosovo on the path to a seat in the UN and improve EU accession prospects for both countries.
While neither Vui nor Thaci has made the detail of their plans public, both acknowledged at a discussion forum in Austria last weekend that border changes were under consideration.
A swap would probably involve exchanging territory in southern Serbia, predominantly populated by ethnic Albanians, for part of northern Kosovo with a largely ethnic-Serbian population.
The US administration recently gave a boost to the plans when White House National Security Adviser John Bolton said that Washington would not stand in the way if Belgrade and Pristina reached a deal, reversing a long-held US policy that further border changes in the Balkans are undesirable.
According to two sources familiar with the thinking of the administration of US President Donald Trump, the new policy is “no red lines, but no blank checks,” meaning that the US is willing to look at any solution, including border changes, but will not necessarily endorse it in the end.
Some EU officials have hinted that the union might also be willing to back a deal that involves border changes.
Vui will face opposition from many at home who would see a deal as admission that Kosovo is lost forever.
There is also strong criticism inside Kosovo, notably from Kosovar Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj, who on Friday said the discussions was a “disastrous ideas.”
“The public discussion on the redesign of borders & exchange of territories is an invitation for new tragedies in the Balkans,” Haradinaj tweeted.
Many regional and international observers have noted the potential for knock-on effects in the region, where some borders remain fragile and open to nationalist challenges.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has come out strongly against the idea and three former high representatives to Bosnia have written an open letter to Mogherini, urging her not to back any plans involving land swaps.
“We can in short, think of no policy more likely to lead us back to division and conflict in the Balkans than the one which some are apparently now supporting,” Carl Bildt, Paddy Ashdown and Christian Schwarz-Schilling wrote in the letter.
Milorad Dodik, president of the Serb-dominated autonomous Republika Srpska (RS) and a candidate for the national presidency in October elections, has regularly called for RS independence.
“I think the EU likes this plan because it’s ‘simple,’” said Lejla Rami-Mesihovi, executive director of Foreign Policy Initiative BH, a Sarajevo-based think tank that has been working on the issue. “But what logic will the international community have against an RS referendum? Is now really the time to give up on multiethnic states in Europe?”
An adviser to Dodik said that the concerns were exaggerated.
“President Dodik is one of the most experienced politicians in the region and he will do nothing, knowing how important it is for Serbia to close the story with Pristina,” said Ana Trisic-Babic, a former Bosnian deputy minister of foreign affairs.
However, there are fears that simply by putting the issue back on the table, it will give fuel to those who wish to reopen questions that had appeared to be long resolved.
In Macedonia, which has a large ethnic Albanian minority and was the scene of interethnic clashes in 2001, politicians are wary of any deal involving land swaps.
“These ideas have been floating around throughout the Balkan wars, and this country has always been very firm in supporting political solutions to political problems that do not require ethnic borders,” Macedonian Minister of Defense Radmila Sekerinska said. “We need to remind ourselves that the biggest atrocities were committed with that aim, or with that excuse, in mind.”
Another key question is whether Russia can be brought onside for any deal. Vui is due to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin twice in the coming months and so far Moscow has given little indication of whether it is ready to drop its long-held opposition to Kosovar independence.
Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that it is down to Belgrade and Pristina to agree a deal.
However, “the deal has to reflect the interests of the Serb people” if Russia is to back it, she said.
She declined to clarify how Russia would assess those interests.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is to visit Russia next month for a summit of the BRICS bloc of developing economies, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said on Thursday, a move that comes as Moscow and Beijing seek to counter the West’s global influence. Xi’s visit to Russia would be his second since the Kremlin sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022. China claims to take a neutral position in the conflict, but it has backed the Kremlin’s contentions that Russia’s action was provoked by the West, and it continues to supply key components needed by Moscow for
Japan scrambled fighter jets after Russian aircraft flew around the archipelago for the first time in five years, Tokyo said yesterday. From Thursday morning to afternoon, the Russian Tu-142 aircraft flew from the sea between Japan and South Korea toward the southern Okinawa region, the Japanese Ministry of Defense said in a statement. They then traveled north over the Pacific Ocean and finished their journey off the northern island of Hokkaido, it added. The planes did not enter Japanese airspace, but flew over an area subject to a territorial dispute between Japan and Russia, a ministry official said. “In response, we mobilized Air Self-Defense
CRITICISM: ‘One has to choose the lesser of two evils,’ Pope Francis said, as he criticized Trump’s anti-immigrant policies and Harris’ pro-choice position Pope Francis on Friday accused both former US president Donald Trump and US Vice President Kamala Harris of being “against life” as he returned to Rome from a 12-day tour of the Asia-Pacific region. The 87-year-old pontiff’s comments on the US presidential hopefuls came as he defied health concerns to connect with believers from the jungle of Papua New Guinea to the skyscrapers of Singapore. It was Francis’ longest trip in duration and distance since becoming head of the world’s nearly 1.4 billion Roman Catholics more than 11 years ago. Despite the marathon visit, he held a long and spirited
China would train thousands of foreign law enforcement officers to see the world order “develop in a more fair, reasonable and efficient direction,” its minister for public security has said. “We will [also] send police consultants to countries in need to conduct training to help them quickly and effectively improve their law enforcement capabilities,” Chinese Minister of Public Security Wang Xiaohong (王小洪) told an annual global security forum. Wang made the announcement in the eastern city of Lianyungang on Monday in front of law enforcement representatives from 122 countries, regions and international organizations such as Interpol. The forum is part of ongoing