Thu, Apr 19, 2018 - Page 7 News List

Regulators ordered checks of engine type that blew up


US National Transportation Safety Board investigators examine the damaged engine of a Southwest Airlines airplane in Philadelphia on Tuesday.

Photo: Reuters / National Transportation Safety Board

European regulators earlier this month began requiring an inspection by early next year of the type of engine that blew apart on a fatal Southwest Airlines flight on Tuesday and a source said US regulators were near a similar rule.

The actions by regulators show that there has been some concern, albeit nonurgent, about the engine, a workhorse of the global civil aviation fleet that has logged more than 350 million hours of safe travel, but was also being examined after a 2016 accident.

Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 made an emergency landing in Philadelphia on Tuesday after an engine ripped apart midair, shattering a window on the Boeing 737 and nearly sucking a passenger through.

One of 144 passengers died.

The CFM56 engine was produced by CFM International, a joint venture of General Electric and France’s Safran Aircraft Engines, and is one of the most common engines, paired with the world’s most-sold plane, the Boeing 737.

Boeing and CFM said they would help with the US National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) investigation into the incident.

Southwest Airlines said it is speeding up inspections of all related engines out of extra caution, which it expects to complete within 30 days.

Minimal flight disruptions might result, it said.

An early review of the failed engine found apparent metal fatigue where a fan blade had broken off, NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt told reporters.

“We are very concerned” about metal fatigue, Sumwalt said. “There needs to be proper inspection mechanisms in place to check for this before there’s a catastrophic event.”

In August 2016, a Southwest Airlines flight made a safe emergency landing in Pensacola, Florida, after a fan blade separated from the same type of engine and debris ripped a hole above the left wing.

The 2016 incident prompted the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to propose ultrasonic inspections of similar fan blades and their replacement should they fail the test.

The NTSB would review whether the engines involved in Tuesday’s incident might have been subject to the directive, which has not yet been finalized, Sumwalt said.

The FAA had “determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design,” it said in a proposal last year.

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) last month issued an airworthiness directive requiring a one-time ultrasonic inspection of each affected fan blade on models of CFM56 engines within nine months of April 2.

CFM had sent a service bulletin recommending inspections, leading regulators to make the directive, it said.

The directive was issued after the failure of a fan blade on a CFM56 engine, which led to the uncontained release of debris, EASA said.

It did not name the airline involved or the incident, but the service bulletin it referenced was the same as in the FAA proposal.

“This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to fan blade failure, possibly resulting in uncontained forward release of debris, with consequent damage to the engine and the aeroplane,” EASA said.

Southwest Airline’s voluntary, accelerated checks are to be ultrasonic.

American Airlines, United Airlines and Delta Air Lines did not immediately comment if they too would speed up such checks.

The FAA proposal estimated 220 engines on US registered airplanes would be affected and that checks would require two hours of labor per inspection.

This story has been viewed 1706 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top