For well-off people such as Philippine House of Representatives Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez, getting out of a bad marriage is pricey, but feasible — but for the nation’s poorest and most vulnerable citizens, it is nearly impossible.
That is because the heavily Catholic Philippines and the Vatican are the last two places on Earth where divorce is outlawed.
For the nation’s 100 million people, the only exit from a union gone wrong is an embarrassing — and labyrinthine — process that often amounts to a luxury.
However, lawmakers, including Alvarez, have launched a new legislative effort to legalize divorce, which activists believe could transform the lives of impoverished women trapped in toxic marriages.
The bill has been propelled forward by Alvarez, an ally of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.
Alvarez said in an interview that ending his first marriage cost him 1 million pesos (US$19,230 at the current exchange rate), which is more than triple what an average family in the Philippines makes in a year.
Like thousands of others, he did it through a civil procedure called annulment, whereby a judge declares a marriage invalid, generally because the spouses have a “psychological incapacity.”
It requires applicants to undergo a mental exam, testify in court and sometimes even claim that they or their spouse entered the union with a disorder, such as narcissism.
The process can take anywhere from one to 10 years to wind through the creakingly slow and overburdened Philippine court system, costing at least US$4,800.
Since 1999, lawmakers have regularly filed a bill to legalize divorce, only to see it languish in committee limbo — until now.
For the first time ever, House lawmakers are poised to approve the bill after backing it in preliminary votes.
It would then head to the Philippine Senate, where it faces opposition from conservative members.
However, the bill enjoys rare bipartisan support, which Alvarez said was a sign of the urgency of addressing broken marriages.
“It’s a badge of stupidity, because we are the only nation that does not see the problem,” the 60-year-old told reporters.
The legislation would allow divorce and exempt poor people from legal fees, listing domestic violence, attempts to engage a spouse in prostitution and irreconcilable differences among the grounds for splitting up.
Not surprisingly, the country’s powerful Catholic Church, which counts about 80 percent of the population as followers, has fiercely opposed the bill.
“It is not according to the scriptures, to the will of God and it does not help,” Manila Bishop Broderick Pabillo told reporters.
The church fought a pitched, but ultimately unsuccessful, battle in 2012 to halt a law to provide free contraceptives to poor couples and teach sex education in schools.
It has also backed an existing ban on abortion and gay marriage.
Surveys have shown that a majority of people in the country have supported legalizing divorce since 2014.
At the same time, the number filing for annulments has grown steadily over the past decade, last year hitting more than 10,000, government statistics showed.
“Filipinos have become more open. They’ve been exposed to norms from other countries,” University of the Philippines political science assistant professor Jean Franco said.
However, with Catholic clergy lobbying and protesting against the bill, its final passage is uncertain.
The country’s outspoken leader Duterte, whose own marriage was annulled, has yet to wade into the debate.
Although he spoke in favor of upholding the ban during his 23 years as mayor of southern Davao City, he is mercurial on social issues.
A long-time critic of the church, Duterte voiced support for gay marriage in 2015, only to backtrack after securing the presidency in 2016, before endorsing it yet again in December last year.
He also has plenty on his plate, with international war crimes prosecutors launching a preliminary probe into his deadly war on drugs, which has also aroused the ire of the church.
Campaigners have said the bill could offer a lifeline to women trapped in violent marriages.
“Divorce is a woman’s issue, especially for poor women who are being abused, because it could provide them an out legally,” Democratic Socialist Women of the Philippines national chairwoman Elizabeth Angsioco told reporters.
For women like Melody Alan, who said she has endured 14 years of abuse from an unfaithful, alcoholic husband, the ban cannot be overturned soon enough.
“He strangled me, pushed me against a wall. I was crying and screaming. I couldn’t breathe,” said Alan, secretary-general of the Divorce Advocates of the Philippines.
The 44-year-old said her husband agreed to accept an annulment if she paid for it — something she could in “no way” afford while raising four kids.
In 2010, she separated from her husband, who now has two children with another woman, but they remain legally married.
“I will file for divorce to get freedom [to say] that this is who I am now,” Alan said. “I can start anew.”
Le Tuan Binh keeps his Moroccan soldier father’s tombstone at his village home north of Hanoi, a treasured reminder of a man whose community in Vietnam has been largely forgotten. Mzid Ben Ali, or “Mohammed” as Binh calls him, was one of tens of thousands of North Africans who served in the French army as it battled to maintain its colonial rule of Indochina. He fought for France against the Viet Minh independence movement in the 1950s, before leaving the military — as either a defector or a captive — and making a life for himself in Vietnam. “It’s very emotional for me,”
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed his pledge to replace India’s religion-based marriage and inheritance laws with a uniform civil code if he returns to office for a third term, a move that some minority groups have opposed. In an interview with the Times of India listing his agenda, Modi said his government would push for making the code a reality. “It is clear that separate laws for communities are detrimental to the health of society,” he said in the interview published yesterday. “We cannot be a nation where one community is progressing with the support of the Constitution while the other
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Central Committee is to gather in July for a key meeting known as a plenum, the third since the body of elite decisionmakers was elected in 2022, focusing on reforms amid “challenges” at home and complexities broad. Plenums are important events on China’s political calendar that require the attendance of all of the Central Committee, comprising 205 members and 171 alternate members with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the helm. The Central Committee typically holds seven plenums between party congresses, which are held once every five years. The current central committee members were elected at the
CODIFYING DISCRIMINATION: Transgender people would be sentenced to three years in prison, while same-sex relations could land a person in jail for more than a decade Iraq’s parliament on Saturday passed a bill criminalizing same-sex relations, which would receive a sentence of up to 15 years in prison, in a move rights groups condemned as an “attack on human rights.” Transgender people would be sentenced to three years’ jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 of 329 lawmakers. A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people engaging in same-sex relations to 10 to 15 years in prison, according to the