Former US secretary of defense and CIA director Robert Gates is backing lawmakers’ proposal to form a special court to review US President Barack Obama’s deadly drone strikes against Americans linked to al-Qaeda.
Gates, who led the Pentagon for former US president George W. Bush and Obama, said Obama’s use of the unmanned and lethal drones follows tight rules, but he shares lawmakers’ wariness over using drones to target al-Qaeda operatives and allies from the sky.
“I think that the rules and the practices that the Obama administration has followed are quite stringent and are not being abused. But who is to say about a future president?” Gates said in an interview broadcast on Sunday.
The use of remote-controlled drones — Obama’s weapon of choice to strike al-Qaeda with lethal missiles in places such as Pakistan and Yemen — earned headlines last week as lawmakers contemplated just how much leeway a US president should have in going after the nation’s enemies, including its own citizens.
“We are in a different kind of war. We’re not sending troops. We’re not sending manned bombers. We’re dealing with the enemy where we find them to keep America safe. We have to strike a new constitutional balance with the challenges we face today,” Democratic Senator Dick Durbin said. “The policy is really unfolding. Most of this has not been disclosed.”
The nomination of John Brennan, Obama’s counterterrorism adviser who oversaw many of the drone strikes from his office in the West Wing basement, kick-started the discussion.
During a hearing on Thursday last week, Brennan defended drone strikes only as a “last resort,” but he said he had no qualms about going after Anwar al-Awlaki in September 2011.
A drone strike in Yemen killed al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, both US citizens. A drone strike two weeks later killed al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, a Denver native.
Those strikes came after US intelligence concluded that the elder al-Awlaki was senior operational leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula plotting attacks on the US, including the failed Christmas Day bombing of an airplane as it landed in Detroit in 2009.
“I think it’s very unseemly that a politician gets to decide the death of an American citizen,” Republican Senator Rand Paul said. “They should answer about the 16-year-old boy, al-Awlaki’s son who was killed not as collateral damage, but in a separate strike.”
Many lawmakers suggested uneasiness about the unfettered program.
“It just makes me uncomfortable that the president — whoever it is — is the prosecutor, the judge, the jury and the executioner, all rolled into one,” said Senator Angus King, an independent.
The potential model that some lawmakers are considering for overseeing such drone attacks is a secret court of federal judges that now reviews requests for government surveillance in espionage and terrorism cases. In those proceedings, 11 federal judges review wiretap applications that enable the FBI and other agencies to gather evidence to build cases. Suspects have no lawyers present, as they would in other US courts, and the proceedings are secret.
Some Republicans were wary of such an oversight proposal.
The Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said his members review all drone strikes on a monthly basis, both from the CIA and Pentagon.